Literature DB >> 32675157

The impact of the national clinical outcome review programmes in England: a review of the evidence.

Pauline Heslop1, Elena Baker-Glenn2, Peter Fleming3, Marian Knight4, Marisa Mason5, Pauline Turnbull6, Clare Wade7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence about the effectiveness of the national clinical outcome review programmes in England.
METHODS: We undertook a scoping review of the published literature for evidence of the impact of any of the current programmes or their predecessors, and asked programme leads to share examples of the impact of their work. Data were thematically analysed.
FINDINGS: Evidence about impact related to clinicians' awareness and practice, structural aspects of healthcare, processes of care and patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The national clinical outcome review programmes appear to have had significant impact, but none are funded to assess the outcome and impact of the recommendations they make or to deliver a programme of change. There is no structured and systematic way in which the findings and recommendations of each programme are taken forward, nor in which the findings from across programmes are collated and considered. © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome review programmes; effectiveness; impact; mortality review programmes; service improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32675157      PMCID: PMC7385773          DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  17 in total

1.  Developing effective child death review: a study of 'early starter' child death overview panels in England.

Authors:  Peter Sidebotham; John Fox; Jan Horwath; Catherine Powell
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Learning from defects to enhance morbidity and mortality conferences.

Authors:  Sean M Berenholtz; Theresa L Hartsell; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Anonymous group peer review in surgery morbidity and mortality conference.

Authors:  Leila C Bender; Mary E Klingensmith; Bradley D Freeman; William C Chapman; William Claiborne Dunagan; Jonathan E Gottlieb; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The Case for a National Maternal Mortality Review Committee.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; Michael A Belfort
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Validation of local review for the identification of contributory factors and potentially avoidable perinatal deaths.

Authors:  Vicki L Masson; Cynthia M Farquhar; Lynn C Sadler
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  A View From the UK: The UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity.

Authors:  Marian Knight; Derek Tuffnell
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Informing best practice for conducting morbidity and mortality reviews: a literature review.

Authors:  Corey W Joseph; Marie L Garrubba; Angela M Melder
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Assessment of the contribution of morbidity and mortality conferences to quality and safety improvement: a survey of participants' perceptions.

Authors:  André Lecoanet; Gwenaëlle Vidal-Trecan; Frédéric Prate; Jean-François Quaranta; Elodie Sellier; Alizé Guyomard; Arnaud Seigneurin; Patrice François
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies.

Authors:  Helen Smith; Charles Ameh; Natalie Roos; Matthews Mathai; Nynke van den Broek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Reducing acute kidney injury incidence and progression in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  Lynne Sykes; Smeeta Sinha; Janet Hegarty; Emma Flanagan; Liam Doyle; Chedia Hoolickin; Lewis Edwards; Paul Ferris; Elizabeth Lamerton; Dimitrios Poulikakos; Darren Green; Robert Nipah
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.