Literature DB >> 28516344

Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients.

Guoqiang Yuan1, Liang Niu2, Yinian Zhang2, Xiaoqing Wang1, Kejun Ma3, Hang Yin2, Junqiang Dai2, Wangning Zhou4, Yawen Pan5,6.   

Abstract

Resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy poses a significant challenge in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Hypermethylation in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is thought to play a critical role in this resistance. Pyrosequencing (PSQ) has been shown to be accurate and robust for MGMT promoter methylation testing. The unresolved issue is the determination of a cut-off value for dichotomization of quantitative MGMT PSQ results into "MGMT methylated" and "MGMT unmethylated" patient subgroups as a basis for further treatment decisions. In this study, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify an optimal cutoff of MGMT promoter methylation by testing mean percentage of methylation of 4 CpG islands (76-79) within MGMT exon 1. The area under the ROC (AUC) as well as the best cutoff to classify the methylation were calculated. Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was chosen as a diagnostic parameter for defining an optimal cut-off. Meanwhile, we also analyzed whether mean percentage of methylation at the investigated CpG islands could be regarded as a marker for evaluating prognostication. ROC analysis showed that the optimal threshold was 12.5% (sensitivity: 60.87%; specificity: 76%) in response to the largest LR+ 2.54. 12.5% was established to distinguish MGMT promoter methylation, which was confirmed using validation set. According to the cutoff value, the MGMT promoter methylation was found in 58.3% of GBM. Mean methylation level of the investigated CpG sites strong correlated with overall survival (OS), which means GBM patients with a high level of methylation survived longer than those with low level of methylation(log-rank test, P = 0.017). In conclusion, ROC curve analysis enables the best cutoff for discriminating MGMT promoter methylation status. LR+ can be used as a key factor that evaluates cutoff. The promoter methylation level of MGMT by PSQ in GBM patients had prognostic value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cutoff; Glioblastoma; MGMT; Promoter methylation; Pyrosequencing; Receiver operating characteristic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28516344     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2433-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  34 in total

1.  Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Christopher M Florkowski
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2008-08

2.  Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Annika Malmström; Bjørn Henning Grønberg; Christine Marosi; Roger Stupp; Didier Frappaz; Henrik Schultz; Ufuk Abacioglu; Björn Tavelin; Benoit Lhermitte; Monika E Hegi; Johan Rosell; Roger Henriksson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine?

Authors:  Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Guido Reifenberger; Alba A Brandes; Martin J van den Bent; Wolfgang Wick; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tateishi; Haruhiko Yoshida; Yutaka Matsuyama; Norio Mine; Yuji Kondo; Masao Omata
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 6.047

6.  Prognosis of glioblastoma with faint MGMT methylation-specific PCR product.

Authors:  Chih-Yi Hsu; Hsiang-Ling Ho; Shih-Chieh Lin; Yi-Chun Chang-Chien; Ming-Hsiung Chen; Sanford Ping-Chuan Hsu; Yu-Shu Yen; Wan-You Guo; Donald Ming-Tak Ho
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Correlation of O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation with clinical outcomes in glioblastoma and clinical strategies to modulate MGMT activity.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Lili Liu; James G Herman; Roger Stupp; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Minesh P Mehta; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  DAPK1, MGMT and RARB promoter methylation as biomarkers for high-grade cervical lesions.

Authors:  Yin Sun; Shu Li; Keng Shen; Shuang Ye; Dongyan Cao; Jiaxin Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  Correlation of MGMT promoter methylation status with gene and protein expression levels in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Miyuki Uno; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Anamaria Aranha Camargo; Ricardo Pereira Moura; Paulo Henrique de Aguiar; Hector Navarro Cabrera; Marcos Begnami; Sérgio Rosemberg; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Clinical Neuropathology practice guide 5-2015: MGMT methylation pyrosequencing in glioblastoma: unresolved issues and open questions.

Authors:  Michal Bienkowski; Anna S Berghoff; Christine Marosi; Adelheid Wöhrer; Harald Heinzl; Johannes A Hainfellner; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.368

View more
  15 in total

1.  Combinations of four or more CpGs methylation present equivalent predictive value for MGMT expression and temozolomide therapeutic prognosis in gliomas.

Authors:  Rui-Chao Chai; Ke-Nan Zhang; Yu-Qing Liu; Fan Wu; Zheng Zhao; Kuan-Yu Wang; Tao Jiang; Yong-Zhi Wang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  Low MGMT digital expression is associated with a better outcome of IDH1 wildtype glioblastomas treated with temozolomide.

Authors:  Isabella Gomes; Daniel Antunes Moreno; Mariana Bisarro Dos Reis; Luciane Sussuchi da Silva; Letícia Ferro Leal; Gisele Melo Gonçalves; Caio Augusto Pereira; Marco Antônio Oliveira; Marcus de Medeiros Matsushita; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Biochanin A Sensitizes Glioblastoma to Temozolomide by Inhibiting Autophagy.

Authors:  Qiang Dong; Degui Wang; Lanlan Li; Jie Wang; Qiao Li; Lei Duan; Hang Yin; Xiaoqing Wang; Yang Liu; Guoqiang Yuan; Yawen Pan
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Clinical, histopathological, and molecular features of IDH-wildtype indolent diffuse glioma: comparison with typical glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hayato Suzuki; Takahiro Ono; Souichi Koyota; Masataka Takahashi; Tamotsu Sugai; Hiroshi Nanjo; Hiroaki Shimizu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Quantitative Analysis of the MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastomas in Light of the 2021 WHO Classification.

Authors:  Levin Häni; Monika Kopcic; Mattia Branca; Alessa Schütz; Michael Murek; Nicole Söll; Erik Vassella; Andreas Raabe; Ekkehard Hewer; Philippe Schucht
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.

Authors:  Daniel J Brat; Kenneth Aldape; Julia A Bridge; Peter Canoll; Howard Colman; Meera R Hameed; Brent T Harris; Eyas M Hattab; Jason T Huse; Robert B Jenkins; Dolores H Lopez-Terrada; William C McDonald; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lesley H Souter; Carol Colasacco; Nicole E Thomas; Michelle Hawks Yount; Martin J van den Bent; Arie Perry
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.686

7.  Posttreatment Effect of MGMT Methylation Level on Glioblastoma Survival.

Authors:  Rikke H Dahlrot; Pia Larsen; Henning B Boldt; Melissa S Kreutzfeldt; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jacob B Hjelmborg; Bjarne Winther Kristensen
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  MGMT Gene Promoter Methylation Status - Assessment of Two Pyrosequencing Kits and Three Methylation-specific PCR Methods for their Predictive Capacity in Glioblastomas.

Authors:  Lene E Johannessen; Petter Brandal; Tor Åge Myklebust; Sverre Heim; Francesca Micci; Ioannis Panagopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

9.  Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide.

Authors:  Alexandra McAleenan; Claire Kelly; Francesca Spiga; Ashleigh Kernohan; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Sarah Dawson; Lena Schmidt; Tomos Robinson; Sebastian Brandner; Claire L Faulkner; Christopher Wragg; Sarah Jefferies; Amy Howell; Luke Vale; Julian P T Higgins; Kathreena M Kurian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-12

10.  Problematic smartphone use, nature connectedness, and anxiety.

Authors:  Miles Richardson; Zaheer Hussain; Mark D Griffiths
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.