Literature DB >> 25575938

Prognosis of glioblastoma with faint MGMT methylation-specific PCR product.

Chih-Yi Hsu1, Hsiang-Ling Ho, Shih-Chieh Lin, Yi-Chun Chang-Chien, Ming-Hsiung Chen, Sanford Ping-Chuan Hsu, Yu-Shu Yen, Wan-You Guo, Donald Ming-Tak Ho.   

Abstract

Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) for the promoter methylation status of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltranferase (MGMT) gene theoretically provides a positive or negative result. However, the faint MSP product is difficult to interpret. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of faint MSP product in glioblastoma (GBM). Critical concentrations of methylated control DNA, i.e., 100, 1, 0.5 and 0 % were run parallel with 116 newly diagnosed GBMs in order to standardize the interpretation and to distinguish positive (+), equivocal (±), and negative (-; unmethylated) results. Cases with the faint MSP product and its intensity between those of 1 and 0.5 % DNA controls were considered equivocal (±). MGMT methylation quantifications were also determined by quantitative real-time MSP (qMSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ), and protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. There were significant correlations between MSP and all the aforementioned studies. The concordance rates between the MSP+ and qMSP+ cases, as well as the MSP- and qMSP- cases were 100 %, and the MSP± cases comprised 76.5 % of qMSP+ cases and 23.5 % of qMSP- cases. PSQ study showed that heterogeneous methylation was more frequently encountered in the MSP± cases. Multivariate analyses disclosed that although the overall survival of the MSP± cases was indistinct from that of the MSP+ cases, its progression free survival was significantly worse and was indistinct from that of the MSP- cases. In conclusion, GBMs with faint MGMT MSP products should be distinguished from MSP+ cases as their behaviors were different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575938     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1701-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  37 in total

1.  Mutagenic potential of temozolomide in bone marrow cells in vivo.

Authors:  Hartmut Geiger; David Schleimer; Kalpana J Nattamai; Stefanie R Dannenmann; Stella M Davies; Brian D Weiss
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Determination of the methylation status of MGMT in different regions within glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Mark G Hamilton; Gloria Roldán; Anthony Magliocco; John B McIntyre; Ian Parney; Jacob C Easaw
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents.

Authors:  M Esteller; J Garcia-Foncillas; E Andion; S N Goodman; O F Hidalgo; V Vanaclocha; S B Baylin; J G Herman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Inhibition of histone deacetylation potentiates the evolution of acquired temozolomide resistance linked to MGMT upregulation in glioblastoma xenografts.

Authors:  Gaspar J Kitange; Ann C Mladek; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Jenny L Pokorny; Ling Cen; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; Gwen A Lomberk; Shiv K Gupta; Raul A Urrutia; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  O(6) -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and low MGMT-encoded protein expression as prognostic markers in glioblastoma patients treated with biodegradable carmustine wafer implants after initial surgery followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.

Authors:  Emmanuèle Lechapt-Zalcman; Guénaëlle Levallet; Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué; Anne Vital; Marie-Danièle Diebold; Philippe Menei; Philippe Colin; Philippe Peruzzy; Evelyne Emery; Myriam Bernaudin; Françoise Chapon; Jean-Sébastien Guillamo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A methylation-specific and SYBR-green-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction technique for O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten Hattermann; H Maximilian Mehdorn; Rolf Mentlein; Susann Schultka; Janka Held-Feindt
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Optimization of quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis using pyrosequencing and combined bisulfite restriction analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Mikeska; Christoph Bock; Osman El-Maarri; Anika Hübner; Denise Ehrentraut; Johannes Schramm; Jörg Felsberg; Philip Kahl; Reinhard Büttner; Torsten Pietsch; Andreas Waha
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Validation of real-time methylation-specific PCR to determine O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene promoter methylation in glioma.

Authors:  Ilse Vlassenbroeck; Stéphane Califice; Annie-Claire Diserens; Eugenia Migliavacca; Josef Straub; Ivano Di Stefano; Fabrice Moreau; Marie-France Hamou; Isabelle Renard; Mauro Delorenzi; Bruno Flamion; James DiGuiseppi; Katja Bierau; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Correlation of MGMT promoter methylation status with gene and protein expression levels in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Miyuki Uno; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Anamaria Aranha Camargo; Ricardo Pereira Moura; Paulo Henrique de Aguiar; Hector Navarro Cabrera; Marcos Begnami; Sérgio Rosemberg; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  14 in total

1.  Weak MGMT gene promoter methylation confers a clinically significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Pinson; G Hallaert; J Van der Meulen; F Dedeurwaerdere; D Vanhauwaert; C Van den Broecke; J Van Dorpe; D Van Roost; J P Kalala; T Boterberg
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  MGMT testing allows for personalised therapy in the temozolomide era.

Authors:  A Dullea; L Marignol
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-30

3.  Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Guoqiang Yuan; Liang Niu; Yinian Zhang; Xiaoqing Wang; Kejun Ma; Hang Yin; Junqiang Dai; Wangning Zhou; Yawen Pan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  MGMT Gene Promoter Methylation Status - Assessment of Two Pyrosequencing Kits and Three Methylation-specific PCR Methods for their Predictive Capacity in Glioblastomas.

Authors:  Lene E Johannessen; Petter Brandal; Tor Åge Myklebust; Sverre Heim; Francesca Micci; Ioannis Panagopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

5.  MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges.

Authors:  Alireza Mansouri; Laureen D Hachem; Sheila Mansouri; Farshad Nassiri; Normand J Laperriere; Daniel Xia; Neal I Lindeman; Patrick Y Wen; Arnab Chakravarti; Minesh P Mehta; Monika E Hegi; Roger Stupp; Kenneth D Aldape; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide.

Authors:  Alexandra McAleenan; Claire Kelly; Francesca Spiga; Ashleigh Kernohan; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Sarah Dawson; Lena Schmidt; Tomos Robinson; Sebastian Brandner; Claire L Faulkner; Christopher Wragg; Sarah Jefferies; Amy Howell; Luke Vale; Julian P T Higgins; Kathreena M Kurian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 7.  Clinical Neuropathology practice guide 5-2015: MGMT methylation pyrosequencing in glioblastoma: unresolved issues and open questions.

Authors:  Michal Bienkowski; Anna S Berghoff; Christine Marosi; Adelheid Wöhrer; Harald Heinzl; Johannes A Hainfellner; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.368

Review 8.  Aberrant Methylation of RASSF1A Closely Associated with HNSCC, a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rui-Wei Meng; Yun-Cheng Li; Xiong Chen; Yang-Xin Huang; Hao Shi; Dan-Dan Du; Xun Niu; Cheng Lu; Mei-Xia Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  MGMT promoter methylation determined by HRM in comparison to MSP and pyrosequencing for predicting high-grade glioma response.

Authors:  Olivier J Switzeny; Markus Christmann; Mirjam Renovanz; Alf Giese; Clemens Sommer; Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.551

10.  The MGMT promoter single-nucleotide polymorphism rs1625649 had prognostic impact on patients with MGMT methylated glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chih-Yi Hsu; Hsiang-Ling Ho; Shih-Chieh Lin; Tiffany Dai-Hwa Ho; Donald Ming-Tak Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.