Literature DB >> 18852864

Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests.

Christopher M Florkowski1.   

Abstract

* Diagnostic accuracy studies address how well a test identifies the target condition of interest. * Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs) are all different ways of expressing test performance. * Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compare sensitivity versus specificity across a range of values for the ability to predict a dichotomous outcome. Area under the ROC curve is another measure of test performance. * All of these parameters are not intrinsic to the test and are determined by the clinical context in which the test is employed. * High sensitivity corresponds to high negative predictive value and is the ideal property of a "rule-out" test. * High specificity corresponds to high positive predictive value and is the ideal property of a "rule-in" test. * LRs leverage pre-test into post-test probabilities of a condition of interest and there is some evidence that they are more intelligible to users.

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852864      PMCID: PMC2556590     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  8 in total

1.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Measuring brain natriuretic peptide in suspected left ventricular systolic dysfunction in general practice: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M J Landray; R Lehman; I Arnold
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

3.  Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.

Authors:  Johann Steurer; Joachim E Fischer; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael Koller; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

Review 4.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-17

5.  Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure.

Authors:  Alan S Maisel; Padma Krishnaswamy; Richard M Nowak; James McCord; Judd E Hollander; Philippe Duc; Torbjørn Omland; Alan B Storrow; William T Abraham; Alan H B Wu; Paul Clopton; Philippe G Steg; Arne Westheim; Catherine Wold Knudsen; Alberto Perez; Radmila Kazanegra; Howard C Herrmann; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Brain natriuretic peptide and n-terminal brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of heart failure in patients with acute shortness of breath.

Authors:  John G Lainchbury; Elizabeth Campbell; Christopher M Frampton; Timothy G Yandle; M Gary Nicholls; A Mark Richards
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

Review 8.  Circulating natriuretic peptide levels in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Alan Maisel
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.930

  8 in total
  136 in total

1.  Identification of Novel Allosteric Modulators of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 Acting at Site Distinct from 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine Binding.

Authors:  Mariusz Butkiewicz; Alice L Rodriguez; Shane E Rainey; Joshua Wieting; Vincent B Luscombe; Shaun R Stauffer; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn; Jens Meiler
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Rectal gas volume: Defining cut-offs for screening for evacuation disorders in patients with constipation.

Authors:  S-Y Park; D Khemani; A Acosta; D Eckert; M Camilleri
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Clinical evaluation of near-infrared light transillumination in approximal dentin caries detection.

Authors:  Gokhan Ozkan; Kadriye Gorkem Ulu Guzel
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Determining a Short Form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) Czech Version: Validity in Mild Cognitive Impairment Parkinson's Disease and Cross-Cultural Comparison.

Authors:  Ondrej Bezdicek; Markéta Červenková; Tyler M Moore; Hana Stepankova Georgi; Zdenek Sulc; David A Wolk; Daniel A Weintraub; Paul J Moberg; Robert Jech; Miloslav Kopecek; David R Roalf
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2018-06-21

5.  A risk model for the prediction of skin tears in aged care residents: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robyn Rayner; Keryln Carville; Gavin Leslie; Satvinder S Dhaliwal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A bioinformatics approach to identify patients with symptomatic peanut allergy using peptide microarray immunoassay.

Authors:  Jing Lin; Francesca M Bruni; Zhiyan Fu; Jennifer Maloney; Ludmilla Bardina; Attilio L Boner; Gustavo Gimenez; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Heparan sulfate differences in rheumatoid arthritis versus healthy sera.

Authors:  Jenny K Sabol; Wei Wei; Marcos López-Hoyos; Youjin Seo; Armann Andaya; Julie A Leary
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 11.583

8.  Optimization of decision support tool using medication regimens to assess rehospitalization risks.

Authors:  C H Olson; M Dierich; T Adam; B L Westra
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Differences between the fourth and fifth Korotkoff phases among children and adolescents.

Authors:  David S Freedman; Jennifer L Foltz; Gerald S Berenson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Guoqiang Yuan; Liang Niu; Yinian Zhang; Xiaoqing Wang; Kejun Ma; Hang Yin; Junqiang Dai; Wangning Zhou; Yawen Pan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.