Literature DB >> 26309774

Does the transapical approach impair early recovery of systolic strain following transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Tomo Ando1, Anthony A Holmes2, Cynthia C Taub3, Joseph J DeRose4, David P Slovut5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) the trans-apical approach (TA) is associated with apical myocardial injury but it is unknown if this injury impacts myocardial function. This study was performed to assess the impact of TA on apical longitudinal strain (ALS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) after TAVR.
METHODS: 44 consecutive patients (age 81 ± 7 years, 48% male) underwent TAVR via trans-femoral (TF) (n=27) or TA (n=17) approach. Speckle-tracking analysis of left ventricular longitudinal strain was performed on images from peri-procedure transesophageal echocardiograms immediately before and after valve implantation. The primary endpoint was a GLS improvement of at least 25% post-TAVR.
RESULTS: GLS improved significantly above baseline after valve implantation in both TF (p<0.001) and TA (p=0.027) groups. The absolute magnitudes of ALS and GLS improvement were similar between TF and TA patients (ALS: p=0.282; GLS: p=0.248). Peak ALS and GLS achieved post-TAVR were similar between TF and TA patients (ALS: p=0.933; GLS: p=0.365). 47% of patients achieved a GLS improvement of >25%; 16 of which improved their GLS to <-15%. The severity of pre-TAVR GLS impairment was a strong independent predictor of GLS improvement (OR=1.61, p=0.003). A pre-TAVR GLS ≥-13.7% was 82% sensitive and 82% specific for TAVR to confer a GLS improvement >25%.
CONCLUSION: Equal improvement in myocardial strain was observed in the TF and TA patients. Pre-TAVR GLS impairment was an independent predictor of post-TAVR GLS recovery, highlighting how it is the patient's baseline GLS dysfunction, not the method of approach, that dictates post-TAVR functional recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; aortic stenosis; speckle tracking analysis; strain

Year:  2015        PMID: 26309774      PMCID: PMC4539097     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 2160-200X


  27 in total

1.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations.

Authors:  Michael H Picard; David Adams; S Michelle Bierig; John M Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Linda D Gillam; Andrew M Keller; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Marti McCulloch; Patricia A Pellikka; Priscilla J Peters; Raymond F Stainback; G Monet Strachan; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Recovery of left ventricular and left atrial mechanics in various entities of aortic stenosis 12 months after TAVI.

Authors:  Sebastian Spethmann; Gerd Baldenhofer; Henryk Dreger; Katharina Stüer; Wasiem Sanad; Davit Saghabalyan; Eda Müller; Verena Stangl; Gert Baumann; Karl Stangl; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk.

Authors:  David S Bach; Derrick Siao; Steven E Girard; Claire Duvernoy; Benjamin D McCallister; Sarah K Gualano
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-27

4.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Hasan Jilaihawi; Samir Kapadia; Augusto D Pichard; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; John G Webb; Howard C Herrmann; Joseph E Bavaria; Susheel Kodali; David L Brown; Bruce Bowers; Todd M Dewey; Lars G Svensson; Murat Tuzcu; Jeffrey W Moses; Matthew R Williams; Robert J Siegel; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Stuart Pocock; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic value of myocardial injury following uncomplicated transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau; Marcos Gutiérrez; Rodrigo Bagur; Robert De Larochellière; Daniel Doyle; Mélanie Côté; Jacques Villeneuve; Olivier F Bertrand; Eric Larose; Juan Manazzoni; Philippe Pibarot; Eric Dumont
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings.

Authors:  R B Devereux; D R Alonso; E M Lutas; G J Gottlieb; E Campo; I Sachs; N Reichek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Prevalence and effect of myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Israel M Barbash; Danny Dvir; Itsik Ben-Dor; Salem Badr; Petros Okubagzi; Rebecca Torguson; Paul J Corso; Zhenyi Xue; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Longitudinal left ventricular 2D strain is superior to ejection fraction in predicting myocardial recovery and symptomatic improvement after aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Aleksander Kempny; Gerhard-Paul Diller; Gerrit Kaleschke; Stefan Orwat; Angela Funke; Robert Radke; Renate Schmidt; Gregor Kerckhoff; Farshad Ghezelbash; Andreas Rukosujew; Holger Reinecke; Hans H Scheld; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Segmental and global longitudinal strain and strain rate based on echocardiography of 1266 healthy individuals: the HUNT study in Norway.

Authors:  Havard Dalen; Anders Thorstensen; Svein A Aase; Charlotte B Ingul; Hans Torp; Lars J Vatten; Asbjorn Stoylen
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-11-28

10.  Left ventricular global systolic longitudinal deformation and prognosis 1 year after femoral and apical transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Brian Bridal Løgstrup; Henning R Andersen; Leif Thuesen; Evald H Christiansen; Kim Terp; Kaj-Erik Klaaborg; Steen H Poulsen
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in aortic impedance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on exploratory outcome.

Authors:  Yukari Kobayashi; Juyong B Kim; Kegan J Moneghetti; Yuhei Kobayashi; Ran Zhang; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Ingela Schnittger; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.