Tomo Ando1, Anthony A Holmes2, Cynthia C Taub3, Joseph J DeRose4, David P Slovut5. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, 10003, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY 10467, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY 10467, USA. 4. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY 10467, USA. 5. Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY 10467, USA ; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) the trans-apical approach (TA) is associated with apical myocardial injury but it is unknown if this injury impacts myocardial function. This study was performed to assess the impact of TA on apical longitudinal strain (ALS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) after TAVR. METHODS: 44 consecutive patients (age 81 ± 7 years, 48% male) underwent TAVR via trans-femoral (TF) (n=27) or TA (n=17) approach. Speckle-tracking analysis of left ventricular longitudinal strain was performed on images from peri-procedure transesophageal echocardiograms immediately before and after valve implantation. The primary endpoint was a GLS improvement of at least 25% post-TAVR. RESULTS: GLS improved significantly above baseline after valve implantation in both TF (p<0.001) and TA (p=0.027) groups. The absolute magnitudes of ALS and GLS improvement were similar between TF and TA patients (ALS: p=0.282; GLS: p=0.248). Peak ALS and GLS achieved post-TAVR were similar between TF and TA patients (ALS: p=0.933; GLS: p=0.365). 47% of patients achieved a GLS improvement of >25%; 16 of which improved their GLS to <-15%. The severity of pre-TAVR GLS impairment was a strong independent predictor of GLS improvement (OR=1.61, p=0.003). A pre-TAVR GLS ≥-13.7% was 82% sensitive and 82% specific for TAVR to confer a GLS improvement >25%. CONCLUSION: Equal improvement in myocardial strain was observed in the TF and TA patients. Pre-TAVR GLS impairment was an independent predictor of post-TAVR GLS recovery, highlighting how it is the patient's baseline GLS dysfunction, not the method of approach, that dictates post-TAVR functional recovery.
BACKGROUND: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) the trans-apical approach (TA) is associated with apical myocardial injury but it is unknown if this injury impacts myocardial function. This study was performed to assess the impact of TA on apical longitudinal strain (ALS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) after TAVR. METHODS: 44 consecutive patients (age 81 ± 7 years, 48% male) underwent TAVR via trans-femoral (TF) (n=27) or TA (n=17) approach. Speckle-tracking analysis of left ventricular longitudinal strain was performed on images from peri-procedure transesophageal echocardiograms immediately before and after valve implantation. The primary endpoint was a GLS improvement of at least 25% post-TAVR. RESULTS: GLS improved significantly above baseline after valve implantation in both TF (p<0.001) and TA (p=0.027) groups. The absolute magnitudes of ALS and GLS improvement were similar between TF and TA patients (ALS: p=0.282; GLS: p=0.248). Peak ALS and GLS achieved post-TAVR were similar between TF and TA patients (ALS: p=0.933; GLS: p=0.365). 47% of patients achieved a GLS improvement of >25%; 16 of which improved their GLS to <-15%. The severity of pre-TAVR GLS impairment was a strong independent predictor of GLS improvement (OR=1.61, p=0.003). A pre-TAVR GLS ≥-13.7% was 82% sensitive and 82% specific for TAVR to confer a GLS improvement >25%. CONCLUSION: Equal improvement in myocardial strain was observed in the TF and TA patients. Pre-TAVR GLS impairment was an independent predictor of post-TAVR GLS recovery, highlighting how it is the patient's baseline GLS dysfunction, not the method of approach, that dictates post-TAVR functional recovery.
Authors: Michael H Picard; David Adams; S Michelle Bierig; John M Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Linda D Gillam; Andrew M Keller; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Marti McCulloch; Patricia A Pellikka; Priscilla J Peters; Raymond F Stainback; G Monet Strachan; William A Zoghbi Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: David S Bach; Derrick Siao; Steven E Girard; Claire Duvernoy; Benjamin D McCallister; Sarah K Gualano Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-10-27
Authors: Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Hasan Jilaihawi; Samir Kapadia; Augusto D Pichard; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; John G Webb; Howard C Herrmann; Joseph E Bavaria; Susheel Kodali; David L Brown; Bruce Bowers; Todd M Dewey; Lars G Svensson; Murat Tuzcu; Jeffrey W Moses; Matthew R Williams; Robert J Siegel; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Stuart Pocock; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Josep Rodés-Cabau; Marcos Gutiérrez; Rodrigo Bagur; Robert De Larochellière; Daniel Doyle; Mélanie Côté; Jacques Villeneuve; Olivier F Bertrand; Eric Larose; Juan Manazzoni; Philippe Pibarot; Eric Dumont Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Israel M Barbash; Danny Dvir; Itsik Ben-Dor; Salem Badr; Petros Okubagzi; Rebecca Torguson; Paul J Corso; Zhenyi Xue; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Ron Waksman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Aleksander Kempny; Gerhard-Paul Diller; Gerrit Kaleschke; Stefan Orwat; Angela Funke; Robert Radke; Renate Schmidt; Gregor Kerckhoff; Farshad Ghezelbash; Andreas Rukosujew; Holger Reinecke; Hans H Scheld; Helmut Baumgartner Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Havard Dalen; Anders Thorstensen; Svein A Aase; Charlotte B Ingul; Hans Torp; Lars J Vatten; Asbjorn Stoylen Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2009-11-28
Authors: Brian Bridal Løgstrup; Henning R Andersen; Leif Thuesen; Evald H Christiansen; Kim Terp; Kaj-Erik Klaaborg; Steen H Poulsen Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Yukari Kobayashi; Juyong B Kim; Kegan J Moneghetti; Yuhei Kobayashi; Ran Zhang; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Ingela Schnittger; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 2.357