Literature DB >> 26982969

Preseason Functional Movement Screen Component Tests Predict Severe Contact Injuries in Professional Rugby Union Players.

Jason C Tee1, Jannie F G Klingbiel, Robert Collins, Mike I Lambert, Yoga Coopoo.   

Abstract

Tee, JC, Klingbiel, JFG, Collins, R, Lambert, MI, and Coopoo, Y. Preseason Functional Movement Screen component tests predict severe contact injuries in professional rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 30(11): 3194-3203, 2016-Rugby union is a collision sport with a relatively high risk of injury. The ability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) or its component tests to predict the occurrence of severe (≥28 days) injuries in professional players was assessed. Ninety FMS test observations from 62 players across 4 different time periods were compared with severe injuries sustained during 6 months after FMS testing. Mean composite FMS scores were significantly lower in players who sustained severe injury (injured 13.2 ± 1.5 vs. noninjured 14.5 ± 1.4, Effect Size = 0.83, large) because of differences in in-line lunge (ILL) and active straight leg raise scores (ASLR). Receiver-operated characteristic curves and 2 × 2 contingency tables were used to determine that ASLR (cut-off 2/3) was the injury predictor with the greatest sensitivity (0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-1.0). Adding the ILL in combination with ASLR (ILL + ASLR) improved the specificity of the injury prediction model (ASLR specificity = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.18-0.43 vs. ASLR + ILL specificity = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.39-0.66, p ≤ 0.05). Further analysis was performed to determine whether FMS tests could predict contact and noncontact injuries. The FMS composite score and various combinations of component tests (deep squat [DS] + ILL, ILL + ASLR, and DS + ILL + ASLR) were all significant predictors of contact injury. The FMS composite score also predicted noncontact injury, but no component test or combination thereof produced a similar result. These findings indicate that low scores on various FMS component tests are risk factors for injury in professional rugby players.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26982969     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

1.  PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ PERFORMANCE FROM LOWER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION AND CORE TESTS.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Shelby Knoeller; Ron Cooper; Nicholas Kothe; Craig Smith; Meghan Warren
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

2.  Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Occupational Injury Among Denver Firefighters.

Authors:  Erin Shore; Miranda Dally; Shawn Brooks; Danielle Ostendorf; Madeline Newman; Lee Newman
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-04-27

3.  FUNDAMENTAL MOVEMENT AND DYNAMIC BALANCE DISPARITIES AMONG VARYING SKILL LEVELS IN GOLFERS.

Authors:  Sean Krysak; Christopher R Harnish; Phillip J Plisky; Amy M Knab; Garrett S Bullock
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07

4.  Factors Influencing the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen and Injury Risk in Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Moore; Samuel Chalmers; Steve Milanese; Joel T Fuller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  INJURY IDENTIFICATION: THE EFFICACY OF THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ IN FEMALE AND MALE RUGBY UNION PLAYERS.

Authors:  Ross Armstrong; Matt Greig
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

6.  FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ (FMS™) SCORES DO NOT PREDICT OVERALL OR LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY RISK IN COLLEGIATE DANCERS.

Authors:  Sarah M Coogan; Catherine S Schock; Jena Hansen-Honeycutt; Shane Caswell; Nelson Cortes; Jatin P Ambegaonkar
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

7.  Effect of the 11+ injury prevention programme on fundamental movement patterns in soccer players.

Authors:  Ezequiel Rey; Alexis Padrón-Cabo; Erik Penedo-Jamardo; Sixto González-Víllora
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.806

Review 8.  Utility of FMS to understand injury incidence in sports: current perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan Warren; Monica R Lininger; Nicole J Chimera; Craig A Smith
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.