| Literature DB >> 28515872 |
Deli Wang1, Weiwei Xia1, K Suresh Kumar2, Kunshan Gao1.
Abstract
The elemental composition (surface adsorbed and internalized fraction of Cu, Mo and P) in marine phytoplankton was first examined in cultures of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum which were exposed to various levels of Cu concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 16 μmol/L with equivalent free [Cu2+] concentrations of 0.4-26 nmol/L. We observed an acceleration of algal growth rates (20-40%) with increasing ambient Cu levels, as well as slightly increased levels of internalized Cu in cells (2-13 × 10-18 mol/cell) although cellular Cu mostly accumulated onto the cell surface (>50% of the total: intracellular + surface adsorbed). In particular, we documented for the first time that the elemental composition (Mo and P) in algal cells varies dynamically in response to increased Cu levels: (1) Cellular P, predominantly in the intracellular compartment (>95%), shows with a net consumption as indicated by a gradual decrease with increasing [Cu2+] (120→50 × 10-15 mol P/cell) probably due to the fact that P, a backbone bioelement, is largely required in forming biological compartments such as cell membranes; and (2) cellular Mo, predominantly encountered in the intracellular compartment, showed up to tenfold increase in concentration in the cultures exposed to Cu, with a peak accumulation of 1.1 × 10-18 mol Mo/cell occurring in the culture exposed to [Cu2+] at 3.7 nmol/L. Such a net cellular Mo accumulation suggests that Mo might be specifically required in biological processes, probably playing a counteracting role against Cu.Entities:
Keywords: algae; copper; elemental interactions; molybdenum; phosphorus
Year: 2017 PMID: 28515872 PMCID: PMC5433991 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Cell abundances, growth rates, physiological states, and cellular elements (Cu, P, and Mo) (average ± SD, n = 3) in 72‐hr cultures of Phaeodactylum tricornutum at different levels of Cu stress
| Dissolved Cu [μmol/L] | Free Cu2+ [nmol/L] | Abundances [105 cells/ml] | Growth rate [per day] | Fv/Fm | rETRmax | Total cellular Cu [10−18 mol/cell] | Surface‐adsorbed Cu [10−18 mol/cell] | Intracellular Cu [10−18 mol/cell] | Cellular P [10−15 mol/cell] | Cellular Mo [10−18 mol/cell] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.0 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 71 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 1.6 | 4.2 | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 122 ± 11 | 0.14 ± 0.09 |
| 0.25 | 0.4 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 69 ± 3.6 | 5.6 ± 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 ± 2.4 | 95 ± 10 | 0.31 ± 0.13 |
| 0.50 | 0.8 | 5.9 ± 0.7 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 63 ± 1.8 | 9.9 ± 7.5 | 8.4 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 53 ± 2 | 0.08 ± 0.03 |
| 1.0 | 1.8 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 0.69 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 59 ± 1.0 | 14 ± 1.8 | 11.4 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 54 ± 5 | 0.71 ± 0.21 |
| 2.0 | 3.7 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 66 ± 1.3 | 25 ± 4.1 | 21 | 4.0 ± 2.4 | 86 ± 4 | 1.10 ± 0.33 |
| 4.0 | 7.6 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 60 ± 3.6 | 32 ± 5.3 | 26.5 | 5.5 ± 1.0 | 93 ± 10 | – |
| 8.0 | 15 | 9.7 ± 2.6 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 60 ± 1.4 | 40 ± 4.4 | 32.4 | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 47 ± 0 | 0.62 ± 0.09 |
| 16 | 26 | 8.3 ± 1.2 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 60 ± 2.5 | 53 ± 11 | 40.2 | 12.8 ± 1.3 | 49 ± 2 | 0.19 ± 0.10 |
Figure 1Growth rates of Phaeodactylum tricornutum in 72‐hr cultures exposed to [Cu2+]
Figure 2Fv′/Fm′ dynamics in the cultures of Phaeodactylum tricornutum exposed to increasing [Cu2+]
Figure 3rETRmax dynamics in the cultures of Phaeodactylum tricornutum exposed to increasing [Cu2+]
Figure 4Kinetics of total cellular Cu and intracellular Cu by Phaeodactylum tricornutum in cultures exposed to [Cu2+]. The dashed line represents a Michaelis–Menten hyperbolic fitting of total cellular Cu with [Cu2+], and the solid line represents the linear fitting of intracellular Cu with [Cu2+]
Figure 5Intracellular P vs. free Cu2+ in the culture media. The dashed and solid lines reflect the effects of intracellular Cu on intracellular P and Mo
Figure 6Kinetics of intracellular Mo in cultures exposed to [Cu2+]. The solid line represents the best fitting by a hyperbolic uptake minus linear expulsion
Comparison of cellular Mo/P ratios (mmol/mol) of marine phytoplankton in our study with previous research
| Phytoplankton | Average Mo/P ratio (range) | References |
|---|---|---|
| 5 phytoplankton species | 0.075 (0.005–0.598) | Finkel et al. ( |
| 20 phytoplankton species | 0.1 (0.01–0.6) | Quigg et al. ( |
| 15 phytoplankton species | 0.033(0.01–0.12) | Ho et al. ( |
|
| 0.001 | Our study |
| 0.25 μmol/L Cu | 0.003 | Our study |
| 0.5 μmol/L Cu | 0.002 | Our study |
| 1 μmol/L Cu | 0.013 | Our study |
| 2 μmol/L Cu | 0.013 | Our study |
| 8 μmol/L Cu | 0.013 | Our study |
| 16 μmol/L Cu | 0.004 | Our study |
Cellular Cu in different phytoplankton species
| Species | Cellular Cu (10−18 mol/cell) | References |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.2 | Hudson and Morel ( |
|
| 11 | Quigg et al. ( |
|
| 18 | Hudson and Morel ( |
|
| 2.9 | Quigg et al. ( |
|
| 0.92 | Quigg et al. ( |
|
| 3.8 | Sunda and Huntsman ( |
|
| 21 | Quigg et al. ( |
|
| 1.3–12.8 | Our study as in intracellular Cu |