Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks.

Literature DB >> 9373691

Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks.

J Epelboim¹, R M Steinman, E Kowler, Z Pizlo, C J Erkelens, H Collewijn.

Abstract

Gaze-shift dynamics of unrestrained seated subjects were examined. The subjects participated in two tasks. In the first task, they tapped sequences of 3-D targets located on a table in front of them. In the second task, they only looked at similar sequences of targets. The purpose of the task (tapping vs only looking) affected the dynamics of gaze-shifts. Gaze and eye-in-head peak velocities were higher and gaze-shift durations were shorter during tapping than during looking-only. We conclude that task variables affect gaze-shift dynamics, altering characteristics of the so-called saccadic "main sequence".

Mesh：

Year: 1997 PMID： 9373691 DOI： 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00075-8

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision Res ISSN： 0042-6989 Impact factor: 1.886

Keyword Cloud
Cited

32 in total

1. Quantifying the Relationship Between Infants' Haptic and Visual Response to Word-Object Pairings.

Authors: Kristi Hendrickson; Margaret Friend
Journal: Proc Annu Boston Univ Conf Lang Dev Date: 2013-04

2. Electrical stimulation of rhesus monkey nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis. II. Effects on metrics and kinematics of ongoing gaze shifts to visual targets.

Authors: Edward G Freedman; Stephan Quessy
Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2004-02-21 Impact factor: 1.972

Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks.

1. Quantifying the Relationship Between Infants' Haptic and Visual Response to Word-Object Pairings.

2. Electrical stimulation of rhesus monkey nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis. II. Effects on metrics and kinematics of ongoing gaze shifts to visual targets.

3. TMS perturbs saccade trajectories and unmasks an internal feedback controller for saccades.

4. Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale.

5. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.

6. The coordination of eye, head, and arm movements during rapid gaze orienting and arm pointing.

7. Manual and oculomotor performance develop contemporaneously but independently during continuous tracking.

8. Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search.

9. Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target.

10. The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision.