Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani1, Lynda Law Wilson2, Sabrina de Souza Elias Mikael3, Laura Morán Peña4, Rosa Amarilis Zarate Grajales5, Linda L McCreary6, Lisa Theus7, Maria Del Carmen Gutierrez Agudelo8, Adriana da Silva Felix9, Jacqueline Molina de Uriza10, Nathaly Rozo Gutierrez11. 1. PhD, Regional Advisor on Nursing and Allied Health Personnel, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, DC, United States of America. 2. PhD, Professor Emeritus, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America. 3. MSc, International Consultant, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, DC, United States of America. 4. PhD, President, Asociación Latinoamericana de Escuelas y Facultades de Enfermería (ALADEFE), Ciudad de México, DF, Mexico. 5. MEd, Adjunct Professor, Escuela Nacional de Enfermería y Obstetricia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, DF, Mexico. Director, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for the Development of Professional Nursing, Ciudad de México, México. 6. PhD, Associate Professor, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Co-Director, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for International Nursing Development in Primary Health Care, Chicago, IL, United States of America. 7. MPH, Program Coordinator, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for International Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America. 8. MEd, Associate Professor, Facultad de Enfermería y Rehabilitación, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia. Executive Director, Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Enfermería (ACOFAEN), PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for the Development of Innovative Methodologies in the Teaching-Learning in Primary Health Care, Bogotá, Colombia. 9. PhD, Volunteer (2014), Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, DC, United States of America. 10. MHA, Project Administrator, Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Enfermería (ACOFAEN), PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for the Development of Innovative Methodologies in the Teaching-Learning in Primary Health Care, Bogotá, Colombia. 11. MPH, Project Coordinator, Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Enfermería (ACOFAEN), PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for the Development of Innovative Methodologies in the Teaching-Learning in Primary Health Care, Bogotá, Colombia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : to assess the situation of nursing education and to analyze the extent to which baccalaureate level nursing education programs in Latin America and the Caribbean are preparing graduates to contribute to the achievement of Universal Health. METHOD: : quantitative, descriptive/exploratory, cross-sectional study carried out in 25 countries. RESULTS: : a total of 246 nursing schools participated in the study. Faculty with doctoral level degrees totaled 31.3%, without Brazil this is reduced to 8.3%. The ratio of clinical experiences in primary health care services to hospital-based services was 0.63, indicating that students receive more clinical experiences in hospital settings. The results suggested a need for improvement in internet access; information technology; accessibility for the disabled; program, faculty and student evaluation; and teaching/learning methods. CONCLUSION: : there is heterogeneity in nursing education in Latin America and the Caribbean. The nursing curricula generally includes the principles and values of Universal Health and primary health care, as well as those principles underpinning transformative education modalities such as critical and complex thinking development, problem-solving, evidence-based clinical decision-making, and lifelong learning. However, there is a need to promote a paradigm shift in nursing education to include more training in primary health care. OBJETIVO:: avaliar a situação da educação em enfermagem e analisar o quanto os programas de educação em enfermagem, no nível de Bacharelado na América Latina e no Caribe, estão preparando graduados a contribuir para o alcance da Saúde Universal. MÉTODO:: estudo quantitativo, descritivo/exploratório, transversal, realizado em 25 países. RESULTADOS:: um total de 246 escolas de enfermagem participaram do estudo. O corpo docente com nível de Doutorado totalizou 31,3%; sem o Brasil o número fica reduzido a 8,3%. A razão entre experiências clínicas nos serviços de atenção primária à saúde e nos serviços hospitalares foi de 0,63, indicando que os estudantes têm mais experiências clínicas nos cenários hospitalares. Os resultados sugeriram necessidade de aprimoramento relacionada ao acesso à Internet; tecnologia da informação; acesso para portadores de deficiências; avaliação do programa, do corpo docente e dos estudantes; e aos métodos de ensino/aprendizagem. CONCLUSÃO:: há heterogeneidade na educação em enfermagem na América Latina e no Caribe. Os currículos de enfermagem incluem, geralmente, os princípios e valores da Saúde Universal e da atenção primária à saúde, bem como aqueles princípios subjacentes às modalidades de educação transformativa, como o desenvolvimento de pensamento crítico e complexo, a solução de problemas, a tomada de decisão clínica baseada em evidências, e aprendizagem contínua. No entanto, é preciso promover uma mudança de paradigma na educação em enfermagem que inclua mais treinamento na atenção primária à saúde. OBJETIVO:: evaluar la situación de la educación en enfermería y analizar en qué grado los programas de educación de enfermería a nivel de grado en América Latina y el Caribe están preparando a los graduados para contribuir al logro de la Salud Universal. MÉTODO:: se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal, cuantitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio en 25 países. RESULTADOS:: participaron en el estudio 246 escuelas de enfermería. El porcentaje de profesores con títulos de doctorado fue de 31,3%; pero, si se excluye a Brasil esta cifra se reduce a 8,3%. La proporción de la experiencia clínica adquirida en los servicios de atención primaria de salud en relación con la adquirida en servicios hospitalarios fue de 0,63, lo que indica que los estudiantes adquieren la mayor parte de su experiencia clínica en entornos hospitalarios. Los resultados mostraron una necesidad de mejorar el acceso a internet; la tecnología de la información; la accesibilidad para las personas discapacitadas; la evaluación de los programas, de los profesores y de los estudiantes; y los métodos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. CONCLUSIONES:: hay heterogeneidad en la educación en enfermería en América Latina y el Caribe. En general, los programas de estudios de enfermería han adoptado los principios y los valores de la Salud Universal y la atención primaria de salud, así como los principios que sustentan las modalidades de educación transformadora, como son el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y complejo, la solución de problemas, la toma de decisiones clínicas basadas en la evidencia y el aprendizaje a lo largo de toda la vida. Sin embargo, hay necesidad de promover un cambio en el paradigma de la educación en enfermería, a fin de que abarque más capacitación en la atención primaria de salud.
OBJECTIVE: : to assess the situation of nursing education and to analyze the extent to which baccalaureate level nursing education programs in Latin America and the Caribbean are preparing graduates to contribute to the achievement of Universal Health. METHOD: : quantitative, descriptive/exploratory, cross-sectional study carried out in 25 countries. RESULTS: : a total of 246 nursing schools participated in the study. Faculty with doctoral level degrees totaled 31.3%, without Brazil this is reduced to 8.3%. The ratio of clinical experiences in primary health care services to hospital-based services was 0.63, indicating that students receive more clinical experiences in hospital settings. The results suggested a need for improvement in internet access; information technology; accessibility for the disabled; program, faculty and student evaluation; and teaching/learning methods. CONCLUSION: : there is heterogeneity in nursing education in Latin America and the Caribbean. The nursing curricula generally includes the principles and values of Universal Health and primary health care, as well as those principles underpinning transformative education modalities such as critical and complex thinking development, problem-solving, evidence-based clinical decision-making, and lifelong learning. However, there is a need to promote a paradigm shift in nursing education to include more training in primary health care. OBJETIVO:: avaliar a situação da educação em enfermagem e analisar o quanto os programas de educação em enfermagem, no nível de Bacharelado na América Latina e no Caribe, estão preparando graduados a contribuir para o alcance da Saúde Universal. MÉTODO:: estudo quantitativo, descritivo/exploratório, transversal, realizado em 25 países. RESULTADOS:: um total de 246 escolas de enfermagem participaram do estudo. O corpo docente com nível de Doutorado totalizou 31,3%; sem o Brasil o número fica reduzido a 8,3%. A razão entre experiências clínicas nos serviços de atenção primária à saúde e nos serviços hospitalares foi de 0,63, indicando que os estudantes têm mais experiências clínicas nos cenários hospitalares. Os resultados sugeriram necessidade de aprimoramento relacionada ao acesso à Internet; tecnologia da informação; acesso para portadores de deficiências; avaliação do programa, do corpo docente e dos estudantes; e aos métodos de ensino/aprendizagem. CONCLUSÃO:: há heterogeneidade na educação em enfermagem na América Latina e no Caribe. Os currículos de enfermagem incluem, geralmente, os princípios e valores da Saúde Universal e da atenção primária à saúde, bem como aqueles princípios subjacentes às modalidades de educação transformativa, como o desenvolvimento de pensamento crítico e complexo, a solução de problemas, a tomada de decisão clínica baseada em evidências, e aprendizagem contínua. No entanto, é preciso promover uma mudança de paradigma na educação em enfermagem que inclua mais treinamento na atenção primária à saúde. OBJETIVO:: evaluar la situación de la educación en enfermería y analizar en qué grado los programas de educación de enfermería a nivel de grado en América Latina y el Caribe están preparando a los graduados para contribuir al logro de la Salud Universal. MÉTODO:: se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal, cuantitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio en 25 países. RESULTADOS:: participaron en el estudio 246 escuelas de enfermería. El porcentaje de profesores con títulos de doctorado fue de 31,3%; pero, si se excluye a Brasil esta cifra se reduce a 8,3%. La proporción de la experiencia clínica adquirida en los servicios de atención primaria de salud en relación con la adquirida en servicios hospitalarios fue de 0,63, lo que indica que los estudiantes adquieren la mayor parte de su experiencia clínica en entornos hospitalarios. Los resultados mostraron una necesidad de mejorar el acceso a internet; la tecnología de la información; la accesibilidad para las personas discapacitadas; la evaluación de los programas, de los profesores y de los estudiantes; y los métodos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. CONCLUSIONES:: hay heterogeneidad en la educación en enfermería en América Latina y el Caribe. En general, los programas de estudios de enfermería han adoptado los principios y los valores de la Salud Universal y la atención primaria de salud, así como los principios que sustentan las modalidades de educación transformadora, como son el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y complejo, la solución de problemas, la toma de decisiones clínicas basadas en la evidencia y el aprendizaje a lo largo de toda la vida. Sin embargo, hay necesidad de promover un cambio en el paradigma de la educación en enfermería, a fin de que abarque más capacitación en la atención primaria de salud.
In the Region of the Americas, many people are unable to access comprehensive health
services to achieve a healthy life, prevent disease, and receive primary health care
(PHC) in a timely manner. The Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization
(PAHO/WHO) proposes the Strategy for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health
Coverage to improve health outcomes and other basic objectives of health systems based
on the right of each person to receive the best standard of health, without exposing
people to financial difficulties
.Universal Access to Health is defined as the absence of geographical, economic,
socio-cultural, organizational, or gender barriers and is achieved through the
progressive elimination of barriers that prevent all people from using comprehensive
health services, determined at the national level, and in an equitable manner. Universal
Health Coverage is defined as the capacity of the health system to respond to the needs
of the population, which includes the availability of infrastructure, human resources,
health technologies (including medicines), and financing. For the purpose of this study,
Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage are jointly called Universal
Health
.Nurses and midwives make up the largest part of the health workforce. However, there is
great variation in the levels of initial education for nursing between countries of the
Region of the Americas, as well as worldwide
.Education is vital to train leaders in nursing and other health professions to create
new mechanisms to achieve Universal Health. Nursing students must learn about the
principles of social determinants of health, and adhere to the code of ethics and
standards of the profession. The quality of education for 21st century health
professionals requires adequate infrastructure, partnerships, and curriculum design
.The education of health professionals for the 21st century should also be oriented
towards the principles of transformative and interprofessional education
-
. The principles of transformative education include: (a) promotion of critical
thinking; (b) promotion of professional skills development to work in teams; (c)
creative adaptation of global resources to address local priorities; (d) integration of
education and health systems; (e) networking and partnerships, and (f) sharing of
educational resources and global innovations
. Interprofessional education (IPE) is one strategy to achieve transformative
education and occurs when "two or more professions learn about, from and with each other
to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes"
. Interprofessional education promotes teamwork and best use of valuable
healthcare resources, empowering nurses to practice within the full extent of their
education and training.The World Health Organization
recommends that education institutions, to respond to transformative educational
needs, adapt their institutional set-up and modalities of instruction in alignment with
interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Realizing this agenda depends on
giving priority to faculty development regarding facilitation of IPE to enable
interprofessional learning
.In September of 2016, the High-Level Commission on Health Employment and Economic
Growth
, established by the United Nations in collaboration with WHO and other agencies,
proposed 10 recommendations to transform the health workforce for the achievement of
Sustainable Development Goals. Recommendation three is related to the scale up of
transformative, high-quality education and lifelong learning so that all health workers
have skills that match the health needs of the population, while working to their full
potential.Nurses are essential members of the health workforce, and thus it is critical to ensure
that nursing education prepares students to respond to needs of health systems and to
work collaboratively in interprofessional teams
. Interprofessional education has the potential to transform nursing education
given that it promotes the development of collaborative practice attitudes, knowledge,
skills, and behaviors
. Ensuring that nursing educational programs adhere to principles of
transformative and interprofessional education will enhance the performance and
productivity of qualified health professionals and result in improved care delivery
.This study was conducted to assess the situation of nursing education in the Region of
the Americas and to identify the extent to which baccalaureate level nursing education
programs in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are preparing graduates to contribute
to the achievement of Universal Health in the region.
Methods
The proposal for the study was submitted to the Pan American Health Organization Ethics
Review Committee (PAHOERC). The committee determined that the project was exempt from
PAHOERC's review because the proposal did not constitute research with human subjects
and therefore did not need ethics review.The target population for this quantitative, descriptive/exploratory, cross-sectional
study included all nursing schools with bachelor's level nursing programs in Latin
America and Caribbean countries.Lists of the schools and faculties of nursing and their contact information were
provided by several sources: PAHO/WHO; the Regional Observatory of Human Resources for
Health; the International Nursing Networks; the Latin America Association of Nursing
Schools (ALADEFE); contacts from the Ministries of Health; national associations of
nursing schools; and nursing associations and organizations in each country. EnfAmericas
social networks were also used for divulgation purposes.Schools were contacted by PAHO/WHO through an e-mail invitation to participate. The
e-mail included a description of the study proposal and objectives, link, instructions
and deadline (four weeks) for completing the instrument online. In Mexico, the schools
of nursing were also contacted by national nursing associations, the National Federation
of Associations of Colleges and Schools of Nursing (FEMAFEE) and the Secretary of
Health. Data were collected from May to September of 2016; after that date, the online
survey system was closed and no other survey data were received.The survey instrument was developed following an exhaustive review of the literature and
was based on the Donabedian model, to assess the extent to which the Structure, Process,
and Outcomes of the nursing education programs prepare students to contribute to
Universal Health. Donabedian developed and introduced a model for evaluating health care
quality based on concepts of structure, process, and outcomes
.Structure focuses on the adequacy of the facilities and equipment, the
suitability of the personnel and their organization, the policies and norms,
administration of the organization, and communication, among others. The items related
to structure in the instrument assessed the numbers of students and faculty, school
policies or guidelines, classrooms, and laboratories. Process focuses
on actions carried out to achieve the objectives. The items related to process assessed
curriculum and clinical practicum experiences for the students.
Outcomes or results focus on concrete and precise measurements of
the effectiveness to the actions planned and executed that demonstrate the fulfillment
of the functions and the purposes established by the organization. The items related to
outcomes for this project focused on the place of employment of the graduates, and
whether they were integrating competencies related to Universal Health in their
work.The first section of the instrument focused on Structure and included
sub-sections related to: 1.1 General Information about the school; 1.2 Mission,
Philosophy, and Objectives; 1.3 Resources, Infrastructure, and Relationships with the
Community and External Groups; and 1.4 Policies. Sub-section 1.1 included general
information questions about the context of the school: country, contact information,
type of nursing education programs, numbers of students and faculty, educational
preparation of faculty and number of hours of students' clinical experiences
(community/primary health care vs hospital-based).The second section on Process included sub-sections on: 2.1 General
Professional Competencies; 2.2 Curriculum Model and Teaching/Learning Strategies; 2.3
Clinical Experiences; 2.4 Nursing Program Evaluation; and 2.5 Student Evaluation. The
third section, 3.1, focused on Outcomes and included questions designed
to evaluate whether graduates are contributing to Universal Health.The initial instrument included 122 items. Three assessments of content validity of the
instrument were conducted and the instrument was revised by the project team before the
final version was sent to nursing schools in the region. The final instrument included
68 items: 16 items related to Structure, 46 items related to
Process, and 6 items related to Outcomes.
Participants (representatives designated by deans or directors of the participating
nursing schools) responded on a 5-point Likert scale indicating the extent to which they
agreed that the statements in each item described their school or program (1=strongly
disagree; 2=disagree; 3=neither agree nor disagree; 4=agree; 5=strongly agree). A "Does
not apply" response option was also included for each item. The final version of the
instrument can be obtained from the authors.Initially the instrument was written in English and reviewed by an English native
speaker. This version was then translated to Spanish and Portuguese, and reviewed by
native speakers of both languages.A link to the final version of the instrument, in the three languages separately, was
made available to participants through SurveyMonkey(r), an online survey
software and questionnaire tool. Participants received and completed the instrument in
their country's official language, with exception to Haiti that responded the survey in
English.Data from each language version of the SurveyMonkey(r) instrument were
downloaded into Excel files, which were combined and then imported into the statistical
analysis program SPSS Version 24. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics
including frequency distributions and analyses of mean, standard deviation, and medians
for the ordinal scale items. Analyses were completed with the whole sample as well as
sub-samples of responses by region, to allow identification of differences across
regions of Latin America and the Caribbean.
Results
According to the data obtained in 2016 by PAHO/WHO, a total of 1283 schools of nursing
that have baccalaureate nursing programs were identified in Latin America and the
Caribbean. The distribution of these schools by country is as follows: Antigua and
Barbuda (1), Argentina (56), Aruba (1), Bahamas (3), Barbados (1), Belize (1), Bolivia
(12), Brazil (796), British Virgin Islands (1), Cayman Islands (1), Chile (41), Colombia
(46), Costa Rica (8), Cuba (5), Dominica (1), Dominican Republic (12), Ecuador (22), El
Salvador (9), Grenada (2), Guatemala (6), Guyana (4), Haiti (1), Honduras (2), Jamaica
(14), Mexico (135), Montserrat (1), Nicaragua (10), Panama (6), Paraguay (11), Peru
(39), Puerto Rico (14), Saint Kitts and Nevis (2), Saint Lucia (2), Saint Vincent and
the Grenadines (1), Suriname (3), Trinidad and Tobago (3), Uruguay (3) and Venezuela
(7). No schools of nursing were identified in Anguilla, Bermuda, French Guyana,
Guadalupe, Martinique, Netherland Antilles, Turks and Caicos.Contact information was available for 1100 nursing schools (86% of the total), and each
of these schools was invited to take part in the study. The final sample included 246
nursing schools (22% response rate) from 25 countries that responded to the survey after
frequent contacts and reminders by phone and emails. Table 1 illustrates the response rate by country.
Table 1
Response Rate by Country, Latin American and Caribbean countries,
2016
Sub-Samples
Country
Number of Schools Contacted by
email by PAHO/WHO*
Number of Schools Responding
Response Rate
Brazil
Brazil
796
91
11%
Mexico
Mexico
28
59†
-
Andean Area and Southern Cone
Argentina
50
15
30%
Bolivia
8
4
50%
Chile
22
12
55%
Colombia
43
20
47%
Ecuador
22
3
14%
Paraguay
11
3
27%
Peru
14
7
50%
Uruguay
3
3
100%
Venezuela
6
2
33%
Central America and Latin
Caribbean
Costa Rica
8
4
50%
Cuba
5
2
40%
Dominican Republic
12
1
8%
El Salvador
9
5
56%
Guatemala
6
1
17%
Honduras
2
1
50%
Nicaragua
10
4
40%
Panama
4
1
25%
Puerto Rico
9
2
22%
Non-Latin Caribbean
Antigua and Barbuda
1
0
0%
Bahamas
2
0
0%
Barbados
1
1
100%
Belize‡
1
1
100%
Cayman Islands
1
0
0%
Grenada
2
0
0%
Guyana
4
0
0%
Haiti‡
1
1
100%
Jamaica
14
2
14%
Montserrat
1
0
0%
Suriname
1
1
100%
Trinidad and Tobago
3
1
33%
Total
1100
246
22%
PAHO/WHO - Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization.
More schools were contacted by national organizations in Mexico.
Belize and Haiti were included in the sub-sample Non-Latin Caribbean due to
the language in which the survey was answered
PAHO/WHO - Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization.More schools were contacted by national organizations in Mexico.Belize and Haiti were included in the sub-sample Non-Latin Caribbean due to
the language in which the survey was answeredData were first analyzed by all responses, and then by sub-samples. The five sub-samples
analyzed were: 1. Brazil, 2. Mexico, 3. Andean Area and Southern Cone (except Brazil),
4. Central America and Latin Caribbean, and 5. Non-Latin Caribbean. The rationale for
selecting these sub-samples related to the primary language spoken in the countries, and
the geographic location. Data from Brazil and Mexico were analyzed separately because
they had the largest number of nursing schools and the team wanted to examine
characteristics of schools in these countries separately from countries with
significantly fewer schools.Table 2 provides information about the total
number of full-time and part-time faculty members in the responding schools by their
highest level of education. Of the 5,338 full-time nursing faculty employed in the 246
schools, 15.0% have bachelor's degrees, 12.1% have specialty degrees, 33.6% have
master's degrees and 39.2% have doctoral degrees as their highest levels of education.
Of the 1,951 part-time faculty, 28.5% hold bachelor's degrees, 21.5% have specialty
degrees and 40.3% have master's degrees, compared with only 9.7% holding doctoral
degrees.
Table 2
Number and Percent of Full-Time and Part-Time Professors Teaching in
Baccalaureate Level Nursing Programs by the Highest Educational Level for the
Total Sample and by Sub-Samples, Latin American and Caribbean countries,
2016
Highest Level of Education
Brazil N (%)
Mexico N (%)
Andean Area and Southern Cone N
(%)
Central America and Latin Caribbean
N (%)
Non-Latin Caribbean N (%)
Total N (%)
FT*
PT†
FT*
PT†
FT*
PT†
FT*
PT†
FT*
PT†
FT*
PT†
Bachelor
93 (3)
51 (8)
144 (29)
58 (45)
423 (30)
338 (35)
116 (29)
49 (35)
26 (39)
2 (5)
802 (15)
556 (28)
Specialty
237 (30)
99 (16)
47 (9)
20 (15)
282 (20)
237 (25)
72 (18)
49 (35)
6 (9)
4 (10)
644 (12)
420 (22)
Master
792 (27)
338 (53)
225 (45)
48 (37)
569 (40)
297 (31)
184 (46)
41 (29)
28 (42)
25 (66)
1798 (34)
786 (40)
Doctoral
1830 (62)
144 (23)
77 (16)
4 (3)
153 (11)
32 (3)
27 (8)
2 (1)
7 (10)
7 (18)
2094 (39)
189 (10)
Total (100%)
2952
633
493
130
1427
954
399
141
67
38
5338
1951
Full time professors; †Part time professors
Full time professors; †Part time professorsReporting by regional sub-samples, Brazil has the highest percentage of faculty (full
and part-time professors) with doctoral degrees (55.1%); the Non-Latin Caribbean (13.3%)
and the Central America and Latin Caribbean (5.4%) nursing schools report the lowest
percentage of faculty with doctoral degrees. A possible explanation for this finding is
that Brazil has a much larger number of nursing graduate programs (master and doctoral
degree), making higher degrees more accessible to nurses there, compared to other
countries. If Brazil is excluded from the sample, the overall percentage of doctoral
level faculty in the responding schools drops from 31.3% to 8.3%. It is important to
note that Non-Latin Caribbean (37.3%) and the Central America and Latin Caribbean
nursing schools (30.6%) report the largest percentages of faculty with a bachelor's
degree as their highest level of education.Table 3 presents the summary data regarding the
number of Baccalaureate nursing students in each program for the total sample and each
sub-sample. Based on the standard deviation of the data presented, Central America and
Latin Caribbean is the sub-sample with the most variation in the number of nursing
students per program: their number of reported students per baccalaureate program ranges
from 30 to 4,332.
Table 3
Descriptive Statistics of the Number of Nursing Students in Programs by
Total Sample and by Sub-Samples, Latin American and Caribbean countries,
2016
Sub-Sample
Mean
Standard Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
Total Number
Brazil
281.2
230.7
222.0
30
1700
25,585
Mexico
355.5
326.5
295.0
10
1756
20,974
Andean Area and Southern Cone
497.3
504.1
340.0
5
2833
34,313
Central America and Latin
Caribbean
804.0
1233.5
270.0
30
4332
16,884
Non-Latin Caribbean
187.8
135.5
133.5
50
425
1,127
Total Sample
402.0
513.2
262.5
5
4332
98,883
Table 4 illustrates the ratio of hours of
clinical experiences in primary health care settings to hospital-based clinical hours by
total sample and by sub-sample. For the total sample, the ratio was 0.63, indicating
that students receive more of their clinical experiences in hospital settings than in
primary health care settings. This ratio was highest for Brazil (0.83), and lowest for
Non-Latin Caribbean schools (0.26).
Table 4
Descriptive Statistics and Ratio of Number of Hours in Clinical Experience
Locations by Total Sample and by Sub-Sample, Latin American and Caribbean
countries, 2016
Sub-Sample
Hours in Primary Health Care or
Community Setting
Hours in Hospital Setting
Ratio
Mean
SD*
Median
Range
Mean
SD*
Median
Range
Brazil
792.2
349.0
755.5
180-2040
949.7
410.6
905.0
300-2500
0.83
Mexico
421.9
397.3
336.0
12-1765
911.7
576.5
864.0
16-2210
0.46
Andean Area and Southern Cone
690.2
581.4
545.0
90-3243
1185.6
816.6
1010.5
110-4000
0.58
Central America and Latin
Caribbean
377.4
306.9
315.0
8-936
696.7
506.4
600.0
16-1604
0.54
Non-Latin Caribbean
342.3
197.4
305.0
144-700
1337.7
590.1
1465.0
240-1856
0.26
Total Sample
630.0
461.6
580.0
8-3243
995.0
613.9
920.0
16-4000
0.63
SD = Standard Deviation
SD = Standard DeviationDescriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median) were calculated for the total
sample and for each of the sub-samples, for each of the 68 instrument items. The mean
for 61 of the 68 items for the total sample was greater than 4.0 on a response scale of
1-5. This finding indicates that the data are strongly positively skewed, because most
responses were "Agree" or "Strongly Agree."In order to interpret the findings, the project team first examined all items with the
greatest variability, having mean scores of 4.0 or below for the total sample as well as
for the sub-samples. Only nine items had mean scores for the total sample that were 4.0
or lower, and only 12 additional items had mean scores lower than 4.0 for one or more
sub-samples.The items that had means of 4.0 or below are indicated in Figure 1, which also indicates the total sample or sub-sample group that had
a mean below 4.0 on that item. It is important to recognize that these findings do not
necessarily indicate that the responding schools are not implementing the structures,
processes, and outcome evaluations reflected by the items. Perhaps some respondents did
not interpret the items to be asking about what is happening at their school. However,
the findings may be used to identify potential areas for ongoing program
improvement.
Figure 1
Program areas with potential for improvement by total sample and by
sub-sample (means of 4.0 or below), Latin American and Caribbean countries,
2016
Recognizing that the data were very positively skewed, we decided to expand our analysis
to examine cells with means below 4.4, since we determined that 50% of the items for the
total sample had mean scores that were 4.4 or lower. These items are illustrated in
Figure 2. Based on this analysis, a number of
the same items noted in the first analysis (means of 4.0 or below) were highlighted in
other sub-samples. The following additional items were noted as having means between
4.01 and 4.4, suggesting additional potential areas for program improvement.
Figure 2
Additional program areas with potential for improvement by total sample and
by sub-sample (means between 4.01 and 4.4), Latin American and Caribbean
countries, 2016
Based on the analysis of items with means below 4.0 and between 4.01 - 4.4, it appears
that the major areas for improvement of nursing education programs related to
Structure include ensuring adequate internet access for students and
faculty; ensuring that programs are accessible for people with disabilities; ensuring
that there are adequate resources related to Universal Health; ensuring that Universal
Health is integrated into the school mission; and ensuring that there are continuing
education policies for faculty related to Universal Health. Other potential areas for
improvement related to structure that were noted include ensuring that members of
vulnerable communities participate in the nursing program, that faculty have experience
in primary health care, that there are adequate laboratory facilities for students, that
the school promotes collaborations with international nursing schools and other
partners, and that the school has policies related to employment of interdisciplinary
faculty.The major areas for improvement that we identified regarding Process
were related to general professional competencies, curriculum and teaching/learning
methods, and faculty and student evaluation. The general professional competency items
with the lowest mean scores for the total sample included: health program evaluation,
information technology, and disaster preparedness. It should be noted, however, that
Brazil was the only country with means below 4.0 on the item reflecting availability of
curriculum content focused on disaster preparedness. Other competencies that had mean
scores of 4.4 or lower for at least three of the sub-sample groups included
environmental health, global health, development of complex and system-wide thinking,
and research methodology/critical thinking.The items with the lowest mean scores for the total sample related to curriculum
model and teaching/learning strategies included items related to
interprofessional education and providing simulation experiences in primary health care.
In addition, the item related to providing individualized learning had mean scores of
4.4 or lower for three of the sub-sample groups. These results reflect a critical need
for health professions educational programs in Latin America and the Caribbean to expand
interprofessional education.The items with the greatest number of mean scores below 4.0 and between 4.1 - 4.4 were
related to nursing program evaluation, student evaluation and outcomes.
These are areas that should be high priorities of nursing schools seeking accreditation,
and could be a focus for quality improvement initiatives in the region. Such initiatives
include developing periodic evaluations of curricula and programs with students'
participation, and sharing the results of these evaluations with educational authorities
and professional organizations.There is also a widespread need to collect data on employment of graduates, and evaluate
the number of graduates who are working with vulnerable communities. Although
respondents from Mexico indicated that they collect such information from graduates,
many schools in other sub-samples indicate limitations in the data they collect.
Finally, there is a need to increase the research projects to analyze, facilitate and
evaluate the competency of the country in achieving the Universal Health.
Discussion
A total of 246 Schools of Nursing in 25 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean
-including both public and private institutions-participated in this study.The ratio of hours of clinical experiences in primary health care settings to
hospital-based clinical hours for the total sample (0.63) of schools surveyed indicated
that students receive more of their clinical experiences in hospital settings. Brazil
presented the highest ratio (0.83) and Non-Latin Caribbean the lowest (0.26).There have been numerous recommendations regarding the importance of providing students
with more clinical experience in primary health care settings, as opposed to focusing
primarily on hospital settings for clinical education. In 2013, PAHO/WHO approved
Resolution CD52.R13 that urges countries to promote reforms in health professions
education to support primary health care-based health systems and increase the number of
seats in training programs in health professions relevant to PHC. It is important to
harmonize the training of health professions with the needs of the health systems based
in primary health care. A paradigm shift in health sciences education should be promoted
to respond to the needs of the population and the health care models with more training
in primary health care services
.The training of nursing students in hospital settings more than in primary health care
settings is related to the labor market as well as the organization of health care
models in various countries. Increasing the investment and employment in primary health
care settings, with more attractive labor conditions and incentives, can strengthen and
increase the desirability of positions offered to nurses in this level
.Only 31.3% of faculty members from participating schools hold a doctoral degree.
However, the vast majority (86%) of those faculty members with doctoral degrees in the
LAC are in Brazil (1,974 faculty members). If Brazil is excluded from the sample, the
percentage of faculty members with doctoral degree in LAC decreases from 31.3% to 8.3%.
Most faculty members present a master's degree as their highest level of education in
Mexico, the Non-Latin Caribbean, the Central America and Latin Caribbean, and the Andean
Area and Southern Cone.There are currently 51 doctoral programs in nursing in LAC. The distribution of these
programs by country is as follows: Argentina (2); Colombia (2); Chile (2); Cuba (1);
Jamaica (1); Mexico (2); Panama (1); Peru (1); Puerto Rico (1); Venezuela (1) and Brazil
(37). PAHO/WHO is developing an action plan to increase the number of nursing doctoral
programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Nurses prepared in doctoral programs can
help to fill the need for faculty positions and assume leadership roles in academics,
health care services, planning and policy, thus advancing the achievement of Universal
Health.The Future of Nursing Report
recommended that nursing schools in the United States of America double the
number of nurses with a doctorate by 2020, since fewer than 1 percent of nurses held a
doctoral degree in nursing or a nursing related field in 2010. There is a need to
increase the number of doctoral nursing programs throughout the Region of the Americas
to add to the cadre of nurse faculty and researchers. Meeting the healthcare needs of
the populations will require larger numbers of nurses, particularly in LAC countries,
and preparing these nurses will require larger numbers of nursing faculty.Other important findings and related recommendations from the literature are summarized
below.1) Only 64% of the schools reported that they have laboratories and equipment
to help students develop care skills. Moreover, access to resources related to
information and communications technologies (ICT) is still limited for both
faculty and students in responding schools from Central America and Latin
Caribbean, as well as Andean Area and Southern Cone countries. Access to
clinical laboratories and ICT has been identified as a priority for nursing
education
-
. Findings from this study suggest that nursing schools should work to
expand laboratory and ICT resources.2) The programs that participated in the study reported having linkages and
partnerships with national or international health institutions for practical
training, consistent with recommendations by the American Association of
Colleges of Nursing
and by Garfield
.3) Between 37.8% and 42.7% of schools of nursing affirmed they have sufficient
bibliographic resources to support Universal Health education for faculty and
students. It is recommended that the remaining schools work to strengthen their
available resources, so that Universal Health can become an integral part of
the curriculum in nursing education.4) Among the schools participating in the study, it was shown that competencies
underpinning the curriculum - i.e. competencies in epidemiology, biostatistics,
public health, social determinants of health, healthcare knowledge and
evaluation, primary health care, and Universal Health principles - correspond
to the guidelines proposed by the American Association of Colleges of
Nursing
and the Association of Community Health Nursing Educators
.5) The high mean scores of the responses regarding curriculum reflects strong
levels of knowledge regarding health system policies (i.e. laws, legislation,
and funding), as well as competencies in public health, community assessment,
patient safety, and public health (i.e. diseases and their management)-all
these had means of 4.41 and above. However, other curriculum components that
are considered to be essential by World Health Organization
, such as evaluation and continuous improvement of health programs,
competencies on information technologies for healthcare, environmental health,
global health and preparedness for emergencies and disasters, although reported
fairly positively, did not reach means of 4.41.6) Other elements that contribute to the preparedness of students to promote
Universal Health - i.e. ethics; human rights; social justice; understanding of
different cultures and the impact of culture on human life; leadership;
advocacy; health services coordination and administration; health and
therapeutic education for patients and groups in the community; knowledge of
the principles of patient, family, and community centered care - should be
fostered in LAC schools through learning experiences in PHC settings.
Additionally, curriculum content should support the strengthening of health
systems through Universal Health values and PHC, with a focus on the country's
healthcare context and priorities
.7) According to the World Health Organization
-
, education of health professionals should be oriented towards the
principles of interprofessional education. Interprofessional education is an
important aspect of the curriculum that supports Universal Health and should be
promoted in nursing schools. However, these results show that most students do
not have opportunities to learn about, from and with students from other
disciplines, and interprofessional team-work is not part of the practical
learning experience neither in simulation laboratories nor in the classroom.
This is incongruent with recommendations from the American Association of
Colleges of Nursing
and the Quad Council of Public Health Nursing Organization
) and may reflect a low level of faculty experience with and
preparedness to engage in such teaching/learning approaches. To transform
nursing education, priority needs to be given to faculty members' skill
development regarding facilitation of IPE, enabling effective interprofessional
learning
.8) The competencies that promote complex and systemic thinking, problem solving
and evidence-based care, in addition to generation of knowledge through
research, only reached a mean of 4.3. In addition, the learning of principles
of research methodologies only reached 4.37. These are essential elements in
nurses' training that lead to development of clinical problem-solving skills
and evidence-based decisions. Schools that were rated as having lower levels of
these competencies should redouble their efforts to strengthen these areas.9) Results show that, in most participating schools, the curriculum model
includes community service as part of learning process, with overall mean of
4.54. The schools also offer adequate learning experiences at the primary care
level, and faculty employ teaching methods that provide students with
opportunities to develop individualized and active learning. These results
reached a value of 4.4 and above, in accordance with studies by Frenk et
al.
and the World Health Organization
.10) The study findings suggest that many schools are not using clinical
simulation or providing clinical training experiences in PHC services, in
contradiction of the recommendations proposed by the World Health
Organization
,
. This finding suggests that more learning opportunities and clinical
simulation in PHC services should be provided to the students.11) Findings also suggest that programs could be improved by increasing the
involvement of students in the planning of practical activities in primary
care, as recommended by Keller et al.
.12) The findings suggest the need for improvement in periodic assessment of
curriculum, with students' participation, and the divulgation of its results,
as recommended by Mackey et al.
and the World Health Organization
.13) Findings also suggest a need for improvement in development of quality
monitoring, evaluation, evaluation reporting and improvement plans, as
recommended by Keller et al.
and the World Health Organization
.14) Finally, the results regarding the number of graduates who are employed in
PHC services and who currently practice in vulnerable communities show a mean
below 3.97. Schools of nursing should be encouraged to promote the idea of
working in primary health care upon graduation, as a way to address the health
disparities in their countries. Schools also need to create information
management systems to follow up with their graduates in the years following
graduation and track their employment and other accomplishments.The results of this study have many implications for future research, social
communication and for improving nursing education towards Universal Health.- In the undergraduate curricula, the practical learning experiences that
support the training of human resources for health related to Universal Health
should be more focused. The nursing roles and competencies that will contribute
to achieving Universal Health should be made explicit in the formal curriculum,
mission of the school and in the contents of the courses, as well as in the
social mission of the school and the university.- There is a need to develop and implement regional and national virtual
training meetings to generate discussion toward reorienting undergraduate
programs with an emphasis on Universal Health.- It is necessary to increase the number of faculty with postgraduate degrees,
by implementing the regional strategies that PAHO/WHO and other international
organizations have designed for this purpose. This implies the need to commit
resources to regional programs to increase the educational level of nurses and
nursing faculty, particularly in Central America and Latin Caribbean, Non-Latin
Caribbean and Mexico.- There needs to be a commitment to strengthen ICT, which is essential for
teaching and learning and teaching both inside and outside the classroom,
including designing and implementing clinical simulation experiences focused on
primary health care, as well as incorporating ICT into health education
strategies.- Leaders in simulation technology for primary health care need to be
identified, who can share their expertise and contribute to training faculty in
less developed countries of the region.- Curricula need to be expanded to incorporate experiential learning for
interprofessional and interdisciplinary work.- Education programs need to take advantage of the regional infrastructure of
national and international organizations and the different institutions
identified as places of development and training in Universal Health, which can
support the training of faculty leaders in education and services
management.- Schools should take advantage of the structure of PAHO/WHO Collaborating
Centers and their associated institutions of higher education to promote the
academic exchange of faculty, researchers, students and nurses, for training in
PHC and Universal Health.- Based on the successful experiences of countries in the region, schools
should join together to define core competencies for Universal Health and to
design a regional core curriculum for undergraduate nursing education that will
produce graduates who are prepared to provide primary health care and to
contribute to achieving Universal Health.- Faculty with expertise in the primary health care arena, and those who are
experienced in facilitating interprofessional education, should be hired by the
schools to provide students with such important and transformative learning
experiences.- The need to increase the number of research projects related to nursing
education as well as outcomes evaluation of training and nursing care.- The need for extended access to the resources offered by the Virtual Health
Library, with emphasis on the design of a specific section on Universal
Health.- The importance of addressing research priorities on Universal Health in the
various national and international events in the region, to promote discussion,
analysis and publication of results
.- The need to gradually ensure shared decision-making for the training of
health professionals by including in the regional, national and local goals the
training of educational managers, deans and health service administrators in
the design of policies, interventions and evaluation of results.- The need to publish evidence of successful educational experiences and
practices in the implementation of the Universal Health strategy.- The importance of continuing studies to evaluate the role of nursing schools
and to document their contribution to the health of the population over
time.- The responsibility of all health care professionals, especially educators, to
urge various professional, educational and civil society groups to work in
support of Universal Health initiatives.- The need to disseminate successful experiences that have shown evidence of
improvement in health with a focus on primary health care.The instrument used for data collection was developed specifically for this study, and
as such has some limitations. Although the instrument was assessed for content validity,
given that this was the first time it has been used, the reliability of the instrument
has not yet been established. There are also limitations associated with the sampling
strategy. Sampling for this research was not representative, as it relied on contacts
available to the research team. Additionally, the response rate was low, and the schools
that did respond may not be reflective of the total population of nursing schools in the
region. A more in-depth study by country would allow a broader picture of each country
and identify particular intervention strategies specific to the country. It is also
possible that some respondents may not have been fully aware of all aspects of their
school's curriculum and educational approaches, and this may have resulted in an
incomplete picture being reflected in their responses. Finally, the data provided by the
schools were self-reported; therefore, it is possible that the data were influenced by
social desirability bias.
Conclusions
The data obtained in the study shows the heterogeneity in nursing education in the Latin
American and Caribbean region. This heterogeneity reflects the geographical, political,
economic and socio-cultural disparities of each of the participating countries.However, at the same time that diversity is observed, there are similarities in both
progress and challenges. The latter represent areas of opportunity for a more
comprehensive and sustained advancement of nursing education with a view to achieving
Universal Health. Countries with greater development in some areas could be supportive
of others in the advancement of human resources for nursing across the Region.Findings from this study suggest that nursing curricula among the participating schools
generally includes the principles and values of Universal Health and primary health
care, as well as those principles underpinning transformative education modalities such
as critical and complex thinking development, problem-solving, evidence-based clinical
decision-making, and lifelong learning. A paradigm shift in health sciences education
should be promoted to respond to the needs of the population. Even though the mean
scores for most of the items were greater than 4.0, the findings can be used to identify
areas for improvement to ensure that nursing graduates, as members of interprofessional
health care teams, are fully prepared to make maximum contributions to Universal
Health.
Authors: Julio Frenk; Lincoln Chen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Jordan Cohen; Nigel Crisp; Timothy Evans; Harvey Fineberg; Patricia Garcia; Yang Ke; Patrick Kelley; Barry Kistnasamy; Afaf Meleis; David Naylor; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Srinath Reddy; Susan Scrimshaw; Jaime Sepulveda; David Serwadda; Huda Zurayk Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Linda O Keller; Marjorie A Schaffer; Patricia M Schoon; Bonnie Brueshoff; Rose Jost Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: Jesus A Serra; Franco Díaz; Pablo Cruces; Cristobal Carvajal; Maria J Nuñez; A Donoso; J A Bravo-Serrano; M Carbonell; C Courtie; A Fernández; L Martínez-Arroyo; J Martínez; S Menta; Luis Pedrozo-Ortiz; A Wegner; Nicolas Monteverde-Fernández; Juan C Jaramillo-Bustamante; Roberto Jabornisky; Sebastián González-Dambrauskas; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Pablo Vásquez-Hoyos Journal: J Pediatr Intensive Care Date: 2021-05-20
Authors: Tonda L Hughes; Maureen George; Ruby Shah; Bruna Moreno Dias; Jennifer E Dohrn; Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Raphael Raniere de Oliveira Costa; Soraya Maria de Medeiros; José Carlos Amado Martins; Verónica Rita Dias Coutinho; Marília Souto de Araújo Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2020-06-19
Authors: Amelia J Brandt; Samantha Brown; Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani; Fernando Antonio Menezes da Silva Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica Date: 2019-01-25
Authors: Cinira Magali Fortuna; Bruna Moreno Dias; Ana Maria Laus; Silvana Martins Mishima; Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica Date: 2022-05-03
Authors: Adelais Markaki; Jacqueline Moss; Allison Shorten; Cynthia Selleck; Lori Loan; Rhonda McLain; Rebecca Miltner; Patricia Patrician; Lisa Theus; Lilian Ferrer; Fernanda Dos Santos Nogueira de Góes; Maria Teresa Valenzuela-Mujica; Rosa Zarate-Grajales; Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani; Doreen Harper Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2019-12-05