Literature DB >> 29985636

Designing Effective Testimonial Pictorial Warning Labels for Tobacco Products.

Emily Brennan1, Erin Maloney2, Yotam Ophir2, Joseph N Cappella2.   

Abstract

Warning labels on tobacco products sometimes feature images and stories of real people whose health has been affected by smoking. We examined effects of some of the design elements that may contribute to the effectiveness of these testimonial pictorial warning labels (PWLs). Beginning with a testimonial PWL that contained an image of a person and a basic warning statement (e.g., "Smoking can kill you"), we examined the impact of adding: (a) text detailing the person's name, age and health status (identifiers); and (b) explanatory statements that elaborated on the basic warning using a testimonial or non-testimonial message. In an online experiment, 1255 adult smokers in the United States were randomly assigned to one of six experimental conditions (2 [identifier: none/identifier] × 3 [explanatory statement: none/non-testimonial/testimonial]), or a control condition (text only warning labels that currently appear on packs in the United States). In each condition, participants were exposed to multiple labels each focused on a different health effect. Effectiveness was assessed using emotional responses, engagement and behavioral intentions measured immediately post-exposure, and quit attempts measured at five-week follow up. Testimonial PWLs were more effective than the text only labels. However, there was little evidence that adding identifiers or the explanatory statements enhanced effectiveness; rather, there was some evidence that testimonial explanatory statements reduced effectiveness. These findings suggest that the most effective design for testimonial PWLs may be to combine a basic warning statement with an image of a real person, without any additional textual components.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29985636      PMCID: PMC6326893          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1493417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  54 in total

1.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  L S Cox; S T Tiffany; A G Christen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.

Authors:  M C Green; T C Brock
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-11

3.  Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker; Colleen M Seifert; Norbert Schwarz; John Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-12

4.  Longer term impact of cigarette package warnings in Australia compared with the United Kingdom and Canada.

Authors:  Lin Li; Ron Borland; Hua Yong; Kenneth M Cummings; James F Thrasher; Sara C Hitchman; Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-12-08

5.  Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers.

Authors:  An-Li Wang; Steven B Lowen; Daniel Romer; Mario Giorno; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Testing warning messages on smokers' cigarette packages: a standardised protocol.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Joseph G L Lee; Kathryn Peebles; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Reactions to graphic health warnings in the United States.

Authors:  James M Nonnemaker; Conrad J Choiniere; Matthew C Farrelly; Kian Kamyab; Kevin C Davis
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-06-27

8.  Graphic imagery is not sufficient for increased attention to cigarette warnings: the role of text captions.

Authors:  Kyle G Brown; John G Reidy; Anna R Weighall; Madelynne A Arden
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 9.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Emotion in the Law and the Lab: The Case of Graphic Cigarette Warnings.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Abigail T Evans; Natalie Hemmerich; Micah Berman
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Smokers' Perceptions of Cigarette Packaging With Audio Warning Messages: A Focus Group Study in Scotland.

Authors:  Danielle Mitchell; Crawford Moodie; Linda Bauld
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  A Narrative Review of the Efficacy and Design of Safety Labels on Tobacco Products to Promote the Use of Safety Labels on Alcohol Products in Canada.

Authors:  Man Ting Kristina Yau; Kiana W Yau; Trana Hussaini; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Effects of Pictorial Health Warnings on Cognitive, Affective, and Smoking Behavior: A Mixed Methods Study in Four Cities in Indonesia.

Authors:  Rendro Dhani; Artini Artini; Sri Tunggul Pannindriya; Albert Albert; Abdillah Ahsan; Dian Kusuma
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 4.  Experimental Studies of Front-of-Package Nutrient Warning Labels on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Ultra-Processed Foods: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lindsey Smith Taillie; Marissa G Hall; Barry M Popkin; Shu Wen Ng; Nandita Murukutla
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.