| Literature DB >> 28510957 |
Tsung-Hsien Tsai1, Ching-Jang Huang2, Wen-Huey Wu3, Wen-Cheng Huang3, Jong-Ho Chyuan4, Po-Jung Tsai5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several wild bitter melon (WBM; Momordica charantia Linn. var. abbreviata Ser.) cultivars were developed in Taiwan. However, little information is available regarding biological function of WBM leaf. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the nutrient content, antioxidant, cell protection and anti-melanogenic properties of wild bitter melon leaf.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-melanogensis; Antioxidant; Cyto-protection; Wild bitter melon leaf
Year: 2014 PMID: 28510957 PMCID: PMC5432827 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-014-0078-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Mositure, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, and ash content and vitamin C of fresh wild bitter melon leaves (on dry-weight basis)
| Variety and cultivars | Moisture (%) | Crude protein (%) | Crude fat (%) | Crude fiber (%) | Ash (%) | Vitamin C (μg/g dry basis) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WV | 83.20 | 5.28 | 0.99 | 1.90 | 3.76 | 1647.32 |
| HL-1 | 81.22 | 6.26 | 1.22 | 1.92 | 2.85 | 1920.14 |
| HL-2 | 83.77 | 4.22 | 0.74 | 1.59 | 2.50 | 2059.03 |
Total phenolics content and radical-scavenging capacity of methanolic extracts from wild bitter melon leaves
| Variety and cultivars | Total phenolics (mg GAE/g) | IC50values (mg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | NO | Superoxide | Hydroxyl radical | ||
| WV | 33.70 ± 0.48b | 4.79 ± 0.30a | 0.79 ± 0.01 | 5.77 ± 0.10a | 0.026 ± 0.003a |
| HL-1 | 25.86 ± 0.36a | 28.00 ± 0.83c | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 9.12 ± 0.22c | 0.042 ± 0.004b |
| HL-2 | 25.94 ± 0.35a | 20.39 ± 1.12b | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 7.71 ± 0.35b | 0.022 ± 0.004a |
GAE: Gallic acid equivalent. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Values in a column followed by the same superscript letter are not significantly different as determined by Duncan's multiple tests.
Figure 1Scavenging activities of WBM leaf extracts against the DPPH (A), nitric oxide (B), superoxide anion (C), and hydroxyl radical (D). Data are given as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Radical-scavenging capacity of leaf extract was represented as % of vehicle control.
Figure 2Effects of WBM leaf extracts on UV-induced ROS production and cytotoxicity in HaCaT keratinocytes. After exposure of UVB (80 mJ/cm2), the cells were further incubated at 37°C for 30 min and then ROS generation was determined by flow cytometry. ROS production was represented as % of control without UVB irradiation. (A) After exposure of UVB (80 mJ/cm2), the cells were further incubated at 37°C for 30 min (B) or 16 h (C) and then cell viability was measured using the MTT assay. Non-irradiated HaCaT keratinocytes were used as the control. Cell viability is expressed as the percentage of control. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Values with the same letter are not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Figure 3Effects of WBM leaf extracts against keratinocyte death induced by SNP (A) and menadione (B) treatment. Cells were exposed to either SNP (2 mM) or menadione (50 μM) in the absence (vehicle) or presence of leaf extracts (50–200 μg/mL). Cell viability was determined 24 hours later using MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Values with the same letter are not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Figure 4Effects of WBM leaf extract on cellular tyrosinase activity (A) and melanin level (B) of α-MSH treated B16-F10 melanocytes. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values with the same letter are not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range tests.