| Literature DB >> 28510940 |
Yu-Te Lin1, Hsueh-Wen Hu1, William B Whitman2, David C Coleman3, Chih-Yu Chiu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The bacterial community of forest soils is influenced by environmental disturbance and/or meteorological temperature and precipitation. In this study, we investigated three bacterial communities in soils of a natural hardwood forest and two plantations of conifer, Calocedrus formosana and Cryptomeria japonica, in a perhumid, low mountain area. By comparison with our previous studies with similar temperature and/or precipitation, we aimed to elucidate how disturbance influences the bacterial community in forest soils and whether bacterial communities in similar forest types differ under different climate conditions.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA genes; Bacterial community; Bacterial diversity; Forest soils
Year: 2014 PMID: 28510940 PMCID: PMC5432764 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-014-0050-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Description of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of forest soils used in the study
| Location | Description of the forest | MATa | Precipitation (mm) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wulai | Natural, low mountain hardwood forest in northern Taiwan | 21.0 | >4,000 | This study |
| Low mountain | 21.0 | >4,000 | This study | |
| Low mountain | 21.0 | >4,000 | This study | |
| Huoshaoliao | Disturbed, low mountain hardwood forest in northern Taiwan | 21.0 | >4,000 | Lin et al. ([ |
| Lienhuachi | Natural, low mountain hardwood forest in central Taiwan | 20.8 | 2,200 | Lin et al. ([ |
| Low mountain | 20.8 | 2,200 | Lin et al. ([ | |
| Yuanyang Lake | Natural, middle altitudinal | 12.0 | >4,000 | Lin et al. ([ |
aMAT, mean annual temperature.
Soil chemical and physical properties of study sites
| Property | Hardwood |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.9 |
| Organic C (g kg-1) | 61.5 | 60.8 | 52.7 |
| Total N (g kg-1) | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.4 |
| C/N | 12.3 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| CECa (cmol(+) kg-1) | 26.0 | 23.2 | 22.5 |
| Base saturation (%) | 2.4 | 3.2 | 11.6 |
| Sand (%) | 3.2 | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| Silt (%) | 43.5 | 45.3 | 45.0 |
| Clay (%) | 53.3 | 49.7 | 48.4 |
| Soil group | Dystrudept | Dystrudept | Dystrudept |
aCation exchange capacity.
Phylotypes of clones in 16S rRNA gene libraries
| Phylogenetic group | Clone library (% of clones) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardwood |
|
| |
|
| 63.7a | 68.5a | 59.6a |
|
| 1.8a | 0.6a | 0.0a |
|
| 0.0a | 1.2a | 1.2a |
|
| 0.0b | 1.2ab | 3.7a |
|
| 0.0b | 1.2ab | 1.9ab |
|
| 0.6a | 0.0a | 0.0a |
|
| 4.8a | 0.0b | 1.9ab |
|
| 23.8a | 25.6a | 23.0a |
| α- | 15.5a | 17.9a | 11.8a |
| β- | 1.8a | 0.6a | 2.5a |
| γ | 4.8a | 3.0a | 3.7a |
| δ- | 1.8b | 4.2ab | 4.3ab |
| Unclassified | 0.0a | 0.0a | 0.6a |
|
| 5.4ab | 1.8b | 6.2a |
| Unclassified bacteria | 0.0a | 0.0a | 2.5a |
| Total clone numbers | 168 | 168 | 161 |
Data with the same letter in each row indicates no significant difference by LSD test at P<0.05.
The 20 most abundant genera identified in hardwood forest and and plantations
| Phylum | Genus | Percentage of clones | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardwood |
|
| ||
|
| GP1a | 28.0 | 23.2 | 26.7 |
| GP2 | 22.6 | 27.4 | 17.4 | |
| GP3 | 7.1 | 13.1 | 12.4 | |
|
| Subdivision3_genera_incertae_sedis | 2.4 | 1.2 | 4.3 |
|
| GP5 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
|
|
| 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 |
|
| 3.0 | 0.6 | 1.2 | |
|
| 0.6 | 2.4 | 1.9 | |
|
| 2.4 | 0.6 | 1.9 | |
|
| GP4 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 |
|
|
| 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 |
|
|
| 0.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 |
|
| 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | |
|
| 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.2 | |
|
| GP6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
|
|
| 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
|
|
| 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
|
| 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
|
|
| 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| GP7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
aGP, group.
Diversity indices for the three 16S rRNA gene clone libraries
| Index | Hardwood |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sa | 87 | 85 | 93 |
| Nb | 168 | 168 | 161 |
| ACE | 140 | 165 | 266 |
| Richnessc | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.42 |
| Shannond | 4.21 | 4.20 | 4.24 |
| Chao1 | 138 | 173 | 258 |
| 95% COIe | 112-193 | 126-271 | 174-427 |
Calculations were based on operational taxonomic units formed at an evolutionary distance of <0.03 (or ~97% similarity).
aS, number of operational taxonomic units observed.
bN, number of sequences.
cRichness = (number of singleton OTUs-1)/logN. The maximum value is (N-1)/logN. The observed/maximum possible value is reported.
dShannon diversity index (H).
e95% confidence interval for Chao1 estimator.
Figure 1Rarefaction curve analysis for forest soil libraries with OTUs formed at an evolutionary distance ≤0.03 (or about >97% similarity). Site notation is as follows: (1) hardwood forest, and (2) Calocedrus and (3) Cryptomeria plantations in Wulai with warm and perhumid conditions; (4) hardwood forest in Huoshaoliao (with climate similar to Wulai but with higher disturbance); (5) hardwood forest and (6) Calocedrus plantation in Lienhuachi (with warmer and less precipitation conditions than in Wulai); (7) Chamaecyparis forest in Yuanyang Lake (with perhumid and cooler conditions, as compared with Wulai). Values for Huoshaoliao, Lienhuachi and Yuanyang Lake forests were calculated from data in Lin et al. ([2010, 2011b, c]).
Figure 2A dendrogram from UniFrac Jackknife environment clusters analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. Analysis involved weighted data. Numbers at nodes indicate the frequency with which nodes were supported by Jackknife analysis. The length of the scale bar indicates a distance of 0.02. Site notation is as described for Figure 1.
Distribution of the most abundant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in forest soil libraries
| Group (Nb) | Taxonomic affiliation | Clone library of each forest (Nc) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4d | 5e | 6e | 7f | ||
|
| ||||||||
| 27 | 3a | 7a | 7a | 3a | 2ab | 5a | 0b | |
| 27 | 9a | 4ab | 10a | 3a | 1bc | 0bc | 0c | |
| 22 | 6ab | 8a | 3ab | 2abc | 1bc | 2abc | 0c | |
| 17 | 1abc | 6a | 4ab | 0bc | 1abc | 5ab | 0c | |
| 17 | 1a | 3a | 3a | 1ab | 3a | 6a | 0b | |
| 15 | 4a | 1ab | 2ab | 3a | 1ab | 4a | 0b | |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| α- | ||||||||
| 30 | 0b | 0b | 0b | 0b | 28a | 2b | 0b | |
| 25 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2ab | 3ab | 0ab | 3ab | 4a | 3ab | 1b | |
| β- | ||||||||
| 28 | 1b | 0b | 0b | 0b | 2b | 0b | 25a | |
Site notation is as follows: (1) hardwood forest, and (2) Calocedrus and (3) Cryptomeria plantations in Wulai; (4) hardwood forest in Huoshaoliao; (5) hardwood forest and (6) Calocedrus plantation in Lienhuachi; (7) Chamaecyparis forest in Yuanyang Lake.
aOTUs formed at an evolutionary distance ≤0.03 (or about >97% similarity). Data with the same letter in each row indicates no significant difference by LSD test at P<0.05.
bTotal number of clones in an OTU.
cNumber of clones in each library.
dData from Lin et al. ([2011b]).
eData from Lin et al. ([2011c]).
fData from Lin et al. ([2010]).
gGP, group.
Correlation of bacterial communities with environmental properties
| Soil properties | Spearman rank correlation |
|---|---|
| Elevation |
|
| Mean annual temperature |
|
| Precipitation |
|
| pH | 0.285 |
| Organic C | 0.414 |
| Total N | 0.407 |
| C:N ratio | 0.108 |
| Clay | 0.418 |
aValues represented in bold are P ≤ 0.05.