| Literature DB >> 28597442 |
Chiou-Pin Chen1, Kai-Wei Juang2, Chih-Hsin Cheng3, Chuang-Wen Pai4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks can be altered through reforestation and cropping. We estimated the effects of land use on SOC stocks after natural deciduous forests replaced by crops and coniferous plantations by examining the vertical distribution of SOC stocks at different depth intervals in an adjacent Oolong tea (Camellia sinensis L.) plantation, Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forest, Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) forest, and Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides) forest in central Taiwan. The main soil characteristics, soil nitrogen (N) content, and soil carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio were also determined.Entities:
Keywords: Bamboo forest; Carbon to nitrogen ratio; Japanese cedar; Land-use type; Soil organic carbon stocks; Taiwania; Tea plantation
Year: 2016 PMID: 28597442 PMCID: PMC5430586 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-016-0147-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Fig. 1Location of the study area and sites, Xitou tract of Experimental Forest, National Taiwan University, Nantou County, Taiwan (TP tea plantation, BM Bamboo forest, JC Japanese Cedar, TW Taiwania)
Environmental information of the four study sites
| Land-use type | Altitude (m) | Slope (°) | Age (years) | Aspect | Dominant species and understory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea plantation | 1200 | 5 | 40–50 | NE |
|
| Bamboo forest | 1200 | 8 | 40–50 | N |
|
| Japanese cedar forest | 1260 | 6 | 42 | SE |
|
| Taiwania forest | 1240 | 10 | 42 | SE |
|
Soil N and C/N ratio at different soil depths in different land-use types
| Land-use type | Depth (cm) | N (%) | C/N ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tea plantation | 0–5 | 1.03 (0.29)a | 11.3 (0.8) |
| 5–10 | 0.52 (0.131) | 10.7 (0.2) | |
| 10–30 | 0.19 (0.025) | 10.1 (0.4) | |
| 30–50 | 0.11 (0.015) | 8.20 (0.53) | |
| Bamboo forest | 0–5 | 0.77 (0.215) | 10.6 (0.3) |
| 5–10 | 0.69 (0.057) | 10.5 (0.5) | |
| 10–30 | 0.26 (0.053) | 9.93 (0.66) | |
| 30–50 | 0.14 (0.025) | 7.11 (0.79) | |
| Japanese cedar forest | 0–5 | 2.08 (0.54) | 15.4 (0.3) |
| 5–10 | 0.80 (0.061) | 13.1 (0.8) | |
| 10–30 | 0.29 (0.064) | 11.4 (1.4) | |
| 30–50 | 0.16 (0.015) | 8.65 (1.80) | |
| Taiwania forest | 0–5 | 2.82 (0.71) | 12.2 (2.2) |
| 5–10 | 1.10 (0.39) | 14.5 (1.9) | |
| 10–30 | 0.26 (0.046) | 10.9 (2.0) | |
| 30–50 | 0.13 (0.031) | 7.00 (2.12) | |
| ANOVA for significance of | |||
| Land-use type | JC = TW > TP = BM*** | JC > TW > TP = BM*** | |
| Depth (cm) | 0–5 > 5–10 > 10–30 = 30–50*** | 0–5 = 5–10 > 10–30 > 30–50*** | |
TP tea plantation, BM bamboo forest, JC Japanese Cedar forest, TW Taiwania forest
*** p < 0.001
aValues in parentheses are stand errors (n = 3)
SOC stocks (Mg C ha−1) in different land-use types
| Tea plantation (Mg C ha−1) | Bamboo forest (Mg C ha−1) | Japanese cedar forest (Mg C ha−1) | Taiwania forest (Mg C ha−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth (cm) | ||||
| 0–5 | 33.6 (9.7)a | 21.2 (5.70) | 58.4 (15) | 55.3 (11.5) |
| 5–10 | 18.3 (3.0) | 20.9 (3.74) | 25.1 (3.0) | 42.1 (14.3) |
| 10–30 | 29.3 (6.6) | 37.4 (8.96) | 43.4 (8.0) | 40.1 (9.1) |
| 30–50 | 20.6 (4.4) | 21.0 (5.6) | 21.6 (6.9) | 14.3 (2.6) |
| Total (0–50) | 101.8 (15) | 100.5 (17) | 148.5 (28) | 151.8 (19) |
| ANOVA for significance of | ||||
| Land-use type | JC = TW > TP = BM*** | |||
| Depth (cm) | 0–5 = 10–30 > 5–10 > 30–50*** | |||
TP tea plantation, BM Bamboo forest, JC Japanese Cedar forest, TW Taiwania forest
*** p < 0.001
aValues in the parentheses are stand errors (n = 3)