| Literature DB >> 30538689 |
Jiaojiao Deng1,2, You Yin2,3, Wenxu Zhu2,3, Yongbin Zhou1,2.
Abstract
We compared patterns of soil bacterial community diversity and structure in six secondary forests (JM,Entities:
Keywords: plantation forest; secondary forests; soil bacterial community; soil characteristics; the Baishilazi Nature Reserve
Year: 2018 PMID: 30538689 PMCID: PMC6277578 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Sites information.
| Samples | Main herb under the forest | Elevation (m) | Forest type |
|---|---|---|---|
| JM | 901.8 | Natural secondary forest | |
| QM | 842.3 | Natural secondary forest | |
| MB | 763.4 | Natural secondary forest | |
| BE | 902.9 | Natural secondary forest | |
| CB | 826.5 | Natural secondary forest | |
| PT | 525.6 | Natural secondary forest | |
| LG | 552.7 | Plantation forest | |
| PK | 552.7 | Plantation forest |
FIGURE 1Variations of soil physicochemical properties in JM, Juglans mandshurica; QM, Quercus mongolica; MB, mixed Broadleaf forest; BE, Betula ermanii; CB, Conifer-broadleaf forest; PT, Pinus tabuliformis; LG, Larix gmelinii; PK, Pinus koraiensis.
Soil bacterial diversity indexes of different samples.
| Sample | No. of sequences | OTUs number (Phylum) | Shannon index | ACE index | Chao1 index | Simpson index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM | 57139 ± 4599b | 2554 ± 151b | 9.71 ± 0.03a | 2635.51 ± 289.86c | 2597.17 ± 223.89c | 0.9950 ± 0.0002a |
| QM | 59376 ± 5996ab | 2710 ± 205ab | 9.48 ± 0.07ab | 2929.07 ± 553.72bc | 2887.56 ± 487.75bc | 0.9912 ± 0.0003bc |
| MB | 61986 ± 4055ab | 2816 ± 174a | 9.32 ± 0.24bcd | 3405.73 ± 285.75ab | 3368.12 ± 395.94ab | 0.9916 ± 0.0014bc |
| BE | 62993 ± 4661ab | 2738 ± 48ab | 9.20 ± 0.07cd | 3236.61 ± 320.61ab | 3119.53 ± 410.62abc | 0.9906 ± 0.0004bc |
| CB | 65460 ± 1322a | 2845 ± 21a | 9.28 ± 0.08bcd | 3637.79 ± 18.88a | 3568.24 ± 149.81a | 0.9920 ± 0.0007b |
| PT | 57237 ± 4377b | 2754 ± 153ab | 9.37 ± 0.05bc | 3168.73 ± 499.72abc | 3118.16 ± 476.67abc | 0.9902 ± 0.0002c |
| LG | 59384 ± 4215ab | 2627 ± 61ab | 9.10 ± 0.09d | 3220.67 ± 108.96ab | 3082.82 ± 96.45abc | 0.9919 ± 0.0005b |
| PK | 59175 ± 1703ab | 2782 ± 217ab | 9.46 ± 0.31abc | 3365.93 ± 271.01ab | 3316.26 ± 318.03ab | 0.9939 ± 0.0015a |
Person’s rank correlation coefficients between soil bacterial diversity indices and measured soil characteristics.
| pH | TC | TN | C/N | AN | TP | AP | TK | AK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon | 0.405 | 0.499 | 0.396 | 0.365 | 0.356 | 0.119 | 0.572 | -0.244 | |
| ACE | -0.414 | -0.411 | -0.404 | 0.022 | -0.362 | 0.298 | -0.141 | 0.493 | - |
| Chao1 | -0.406 | -0.374 | -0.377 | 0.069 | -0.346 | 0.316 | -0.100 | 0.475 | - |
| Simpson | 0.576 | 0.361 | 0.243 | 0.255 | 0.360 | 0.409 | 0.419 | 0.561 |
Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial phyla (>1%) present in the soil samples.
| Samples | Proteobacteria (%) | Acidobacteria (%) | Actinobacteria (%) | Verrucomicrobia (%) | Chloroflexi (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM | 41.31 ± 0.59cd | 15.19 ± 1.27e | 15.87 ± 2.85a | 6.94 ± 1.97a | 7.36 ± 0.11a |
| QM | 45.11 ± 1.19ab | 19.33 ± 0.96cd | 14.80 ± 2.94a | 6.38 ± 1.80a | 4.16 ± 0.12cd |
| MB | 44.99 ± 0.31ab | 19.01 ± 1.02cd | 16.40 ± 3.17a | 5.72 ± 4.92a | 4.92 ± 1.58bcd |
| BE | 44.08 ± 0.15ab | 17.73 ± 1.31de | 16.61 ± 4.72a | 7.97 ± 4.13a | 4.75 ± 0.85bcd |
| CB | 44.12 ± 0.73ab | 23.60 ± 0.68b | 14.93 ± 1.62a | 5.59 ± 0.57a | 3.03 ± 0.35d |
| PT | 46.77 ± 1.02a | 21.52 ± 2.47bc | 8.48 ± 2.16b | 5.25 ± 1.46a | 6.50 ± 0.53ab |
| LG | 42.97 ± 0.82bc | 27.32 ± 0.75a | 7.03 ± 3.15b | 7.22 ± 2.59a | 5.39 ± 0.24bc |
| PK | 39.98 ± 3.94d | 19.13 ± 2.46cd | 8.26 ± 2.48b | 4.18 ± 1.27a | 6.58 ± 2.48ab |
| JM | 3.26 ± 0.42ab | 3.15 ± 0.14a | 1.97 ± 0.34a | 0.21 ± 0.03b | 3.33 ± 0.29a |
| QM | 2.87 ± 0.36ab | 2.83 ± 0.31ab | 2.10 ± 0.42a | 0.55 ± 0.09b | 0.75 ± 0.46de |
| MB | 1.82 ± 1.19b | 2.41 ± 1.01abc | 1.95 ± 0.71a | 0.56 ± 0.13b | 1.29 ± 0.53bcd |
| BE | 1.61 ± 0.63b | 2.19 ± 0.43bc | 2.48 ± 0.03a | 0.46 ± 0.15b | 1.07 ± 0.22cd |
| CB | 1.89 ± 0.26b | 1.93 ± 0.09c | 2.34 ± 0.26a | 0.88 ± 0.04b | 0.35 ± 0.07e |
| PT | 2.58 ± 0.06b | 3.12 ± 0.22a | 2.29 ± 0.45a | 0.52 ± 0.26b | 0.94 ± 0.08d |
| LG | 1.97 ± 0.15b | 2.22 ± 0.39bc | 2.17 ± 0.25a | 0.55 ± 0.29b | 1.53 ± 0.17bc |
| PK | 4.64 ± 2.86a | 2.17 ± 0.30bc | 1.96 ± 0.40a | 8.50 ± 7.83a | 1.70 ± 0.46b |
FIGURE 2Cladogram of soil bacterial in revegetation types via LEfSe method identifies the significantly different abundant taxa. Circle radiation from inner to outer of evolutionary branch figure represents the classification of the level from phylum doorgenus; every small circle represents the level of a classification in different classification level. The diameter of the circle is proportional to the relative abundance; the principle is that the species without significant differences uniformly color to yellow, and the other species are colored according to the highest abundance of the species. JM, Juglans mandshurica; QM, Quercus mongolica; MB, mixed broadleaf forest; BE, Betula ermanii; CB, Conifer-broadleaf forest; PT, Pinus tabuliformis; LG, Larix gmelinii.
FIGURE 3Heatmap and hierarchical cluster analysis based on the relative abundances of the top 50 genera identified in the bacterial communities of the soils. The samples are grouped according to the similarity of each other, and the clustering results are arranged horizontally according to the clustering results. In the figure, red represents the genus with higher abundance in the corresponding sample, and green represents the genus with lower abundance. JM, Juglans mandshurica; QM, Quercus mongolica; MB, Mixed Broadleaf forest; BE, Betula ermanii; CB, Conifer-broadleaf forest; PT, Pinus tabuliformis; LG, Larix gmelinii; PK, Pinus koraiensis.
FIGURE 4Principal component analysis of the composition of bacterial communities in the soil of forests with different dominant trees. JM, Juglans mandshurica; QM, Quercus mongolica; MB, Mixed Broadleaf forest; BE, Betula ermanii; CB, Conifer-broadleaf forest; PT, Pinus tabuliformis; LG, Larix gmelinii; PK, Pinus koraiensis.
FIGURE 5Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) on soil dominant bacteria phyla (A) and soil dominant bacteria genus (B) constrained by soil variables.
Person’s rank correlations between the relative abundances of dominant bacteria groups and measured soil characteristics.
| Bacteria group | pH | TC | TN | C/N | AN | TP | AP | TK | AK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylun | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Proteobacteria | -0.456 | -0.093 | -0.047 | 0.044 | -0.162 | -0.316 | - | -0.706 | -0.337 |
| Acidobacteria | -0.169 | -0.560 | -0.594 | 0.121 | -0.505 | 0.042 | -0.629 | 0.227 | - |
| Actinobacteria | -0.445 | -0.031 | 0.415 | 0.177 | -0.355 | 0.614 | |||
| Verrucomicrobia | -0.168 | 0.387 | 0.469 | -0.351 | 0.504 | -0.067 | -0.271 | -0.359 | 0.426 |
| Chloroflexi | -0.215 | -0.234 | -0.026 | -0.225 | -0.509 | 0.357 | 0.025 | 0.322 | |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.475 | -0.150 | -0.204 | 0.124 | -0.232 | -0.046 | 0.377 | 0.200 | |
| Gemmatimonadetes | 0.452 | 0.184 | 0.144 | 0.210 | 0.055 | -0.464 | -0.129 | -0.716∗ | 0.498 |
| Planctomycetes | -0.440 | -0.235 | -0.230 | 0.073 | -0.217 | 0.039 | -0.461 | -0.346 | -0.307 |
| Firmicutes | 0.235 | -0.415 | -0.409 | -0.108 | -0.414 | 0.029 | 0.701 | -0.230 | |
| Nitrospirae | 0.317 | 0.271 | 0.004 | 0.349 | -0.078 | 0.520 | 0.075 | 0.702 | |
| Genus | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| -0.491 | -0.212 | -0.150 | -0.015 | -0.296 | -0.406 | - | -0.700 | -0.340 | |
| -0.550 | -0.336 | -0.321 | -0.016 | -0.256 | 0.210 | -0.626 | 0.177 | - | |
| - | 0.406 | 0.461 | -0.110 | 0.451 | 0.452 | -0.215 | -0.099 | -0.090 | |
| -0.183 | -0.453 | -0.435 | -0.175 | -0.325 | 0.223 | -0.082 | -0.626 | ||
| -0.415 | -0.530 | -0.573 | 0.199 | -0.502 | 0.245 | -0.500 | 0.264 | - | |
| -0.423 | 0.349 | 0.495 | -0.530 | 0.397 | -0.199 | -0.254 | -0.126 | 0.205 | |
| -0.518 | 0.381 | 0.559 | -0.666 | 0.465 | -0.083 | 0.165 | -0.069 | 0.400 | |
| -0.503 | -0.476 | -0.539 | 0.372 | -0.541 | 0.192 | -0.531 | -0.053 | - | |
| 0.578 | 0.262 | 0.295 | -0.282 | 0.400 | -0.179 | 0.077 | 0.056 | 0.459 | |
| -0.650 | 0.221 | 0.334 | -0.256 | 0.172 | -0.280 | -0.607 | -0.613 | 0.002 |