| Literature DB >> 28510823 |
Yu Pan1,2, Ji Zhang2, Yan-Li Zhao2, Yuan-Zhong Wang3, Heng-Yu Huang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gentiana rigescens, an important medicinal plant in China, has been widely cultivated in Yunnan province, China. Previous studies were focused on analysis and determination of the metabolites isolated from this species, the accumulation of these metabolites during growth period are not yet clear. In this study, samples for the experiments were obtained by tissue culture. FT-IR and LC-MS/MS method were performed to distinguish the variation on the major metabolites in G. rigescens during growing stage when combined with chemometrics.Entities:
Keywords: FT-IR; Gentiana rigescens; LC-MS/MS; Metabolites variation; Tissue culture
Year: 2015 PMID: 28510823 PMCID: PMC5434671 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-015-0094-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Fig. 1Tissue culture flowchart of G. rigescens
Fig. 2Index compounds of G. rigescens. (1. loganic acid; 2. swertiamarin; 3. gentiopicroside; 4. sweroside; 5. isoorientin; 6. isovitexin)
Fig. 3The PCA scores plot of samples during different stage based on FT-IR
Fig. 4UPLC profiling of G. rigescens. (1. loganic acid; 2. swertiamarin; 3. gentiopicroside; 4. sweroside; 5. isoorientin; 6. isovitexin; a: callus; b: BP-stem; c: BP-leaf; d: RP-root; e: RP-stem; f: RP-leaf; g: MP-root h: MP-stem; i: MP-leaf)
Linear regression and MRM parameters of standards
| Analytes | Regression equation | Linearity range (μg/mL) | R2 | LOD (μg/mL) | LOQ (μg/mL) | Ions pairs | CE (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loganic acid | y = 2099.0x + 19518.7 | 50-500 | 0.9996 | 0.34 | 1.01 | 421 > 375 | 27 |
| Loganic acida | y = 200150.0x + 2801.4 | 0.05-5 | 0.9997 | 0.004 | 0.022 | 421 > 213 | 22 |
| Swertiamarin | y = 2151.2x + 11429.0 | 10-150 | 0.9998 | 0.27 | 0.92 | 419 > 179 | 18 |
| Swertiamarina | y = 169057.0x + 3753.2 | 0.1-5 | 0.9995 | 0.005 | 0.027 | 419 > 141 | 23 |
| Gentiopicroside | y = 1494.4x + 21722.0 | 5-1500 | 0.9995 | 0.23 | 1.03 | 401 > 197 | 14 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 401 > 89 | 21 |
| Swerosidea | y = 292679.0x + 5034.6 | 0.5-10 | 0.9992 | 0.008 | 0.037 | 359 > 197 | −31 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 359 > 127 | −10 |
| Isoorientin | y = 2945.4x-6172.4 | 5-250 | 0.9993 | 0.57 | 2.33 | 447 > 327 | 27 |
| Isoorientin a | y = 278957.0x + 4532.8 | 0.05-5 | 0.9994 | 0.007 | 0.041 | 447 > 357 | 23 |
| Isovitexin | y = 1979.7x + 19518.7 | 5-250 | 0.9998 | 0.63 | 1.97 | 431 > 311 | 24 |
| Isovitexin a | y = 409813.0x + 1523.7 | 0.05-5 | 0.9996 | 0.007 | 0.037 | 431 > 331 | 22 |
-: not mentioned
a: determination by MRM
Precision accuracy and repeatability (%RSD) of this method
| Analytes | Intra-day RSD% | Inter-day RSD% | Accuracy ( | Repeatability ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | |||||
| Pa | Pa | Pa | Pa | Mean recovery | RSD% | RSD% | |
| UV detector | |||||||
| Loganic acid | 1.13 | 2.09 | 2.36 | 1.58 | 102.6 % | 1.93 | 1.79 |
| Swertiamarin | 1.53 | 1.72 | 1.97 | 1.46 | 101.8 % | 2.62 | 1.88 |
| Gentiopicroside | 1.74 | 1.85 | 2.27 | 1.38 | 98.7 % | 1.77 | 1.69 |
| Isoorientin | 1.22 | 2.21 | 2.33 | 2.25 | 102.2 % | 2.56 | 1.71 |
| Isovitexin | 1.27 | 1.85 | 1.76 | 1.64 | 97.3 % | 2.13 | 2.07 |
| MRM | |||||||
| Loganic acid | 1.26 | 1.58 | 1.71 | 1.57 | 99.3 % | 1.99 | 1.86 |
| Swertiamarin | 1.45 | 1.31 | 1.67 | 1.78 | 100.9 % | 1.86 | 1.22 |
| Sweroside | 1.48 | 1.37 | 1.94 | 0.76 | 101.4 | 1.78 | 1.85 |
| Isoorientin | 0.95 | 1.08 | 1.88 | 1.21 | 98.7 % | 2.14 | 1.29 |
| Isovitexin | 1.66 | 1.33 | 1.92 | 1.59 | 98.9 % | 1.98 | 2.24 |
Pa: peak areas
Mean Contents (mg/g) of six standards (n = 6)
| Analytes | Loganic acid | Swertiamarin | Gentiopicroside | Sweroside | Isoorientin | Isovitexin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callus | 0.053 ± 0.002a | 0.017 ± 0.001a | 0.35 ± 0.25 | 0.05 ± 0.001a | 0.013 ± 0.002a | 0.075 ± 0.01a |
| BP-stem | 3.12 ± 0.17 | 1.66 ± 0.22 | 45.11 ± 2.21 | 0.06 ± 0.001a | 0.016 ± 0.002a | 2.25 ± 0.62 |
| BP-leaf | 3.73 ± 0.28 | 2.78 ± 0.44 | 85.13 ± 3.93 | 0.81 ± 0.04a | 0.021 ± 0.002a | 2.17 ± 0.58 |
| RP-root | 0.034 ± 0.005a | 0.038 ± 0.005a | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.007a | - | - |
| RP-stem | 3.66 ± 0.02 | 2.65 ± 0.02 | 62.13 ± 5.66 | 0.36 ± 0.03a | 0.036 ± 0.001a | 2.87 ± 0.72 |
| RP-leaf | 4.55 ± 0.72 | 2.83 ± 0.14 | 122.93 ± 7.01 | 0.41 ± 0.04a | 0.047 ± 0.002a | 3.07 ± 0.33 |
| MP-root | 8.52 ± 0.59 | 6.16 ± 0.72 | 96.78 ± 8.54 | 0.27 ± 0.07a | - | - |
| MP-stem | 4.90 ± 0.11 | 3.06 ± 0.25 | 17.58 ± 3.21 | 0.46 ± 0.02a | 1.58 ± 0.32. | 0.83 ± 0.02 |
| MP-leaf | 5.51 ± 0.21 | 4.11 ± 0.21 | 26.05 ± 4.33 | 1.16 ± 0.13a | 2.84 ± 0.52 | 0.85 ± 0.22 |
a: Determination by MRM
Fig. 5a: Determination of gentiopicroside in different sample. b: Determination of isoorientin and isovitexin in leaf during different stage