| Literature DB >> 28510817 |
Hsin-Yi Liu1, Hsin-Yi Peng2, Shih-Lan Hsu3, Ting-Ting Jong4, Su-Tze Chou5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Graptopetalum paraguayense E. Walther is a popular traditional Chinese herb and possesses several health benefits. In earlier studies, we demonstrated that G. paraguayense showed no genotoxicity and showed several biological activities. However, the constituents of G. paraguayense have not been studied yet. In this present study, we isolated and identified the constituents of the leaves of G. paraguayense E. Walther.Entities:
Keywords: 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaroyl (HMG); Antioxidative activity; Flavonoid glycoside; Graptopetalum paraguayense
Year: 2015 PMID: 28510817 PMCID: PMC5430333 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-015-0088-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Figure 1Structures of 1–4.
Summarizes pertinent H and C NMR spectral data and assignments
| Position | Compound 1 | Compound 2 | Compound 3 | Compound 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in Acetone- | (in Acetone- | (in Acetone- | (in Acetone- | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 158.4 | 158.6 | 158.0 | 158.1 | ||||
|
| 135.2 | 133.3 | 134.4 | 134.2 | ||||
|
| 178.9 | 177.4 | 178.5 | 178.6 | ||||
|
| 162.6 | 161.2 | 162.8 | 162.8 | ||||
|
| 6.28 (1H, d, 1.8) | 99.5 | 6.28 (1H, d, 1.8) | 98.8 | 6.26 (1H, d, 1.8) | 99.4 | 6.26 (1H, d, 1.8) | 98.2 |
|
| 165.1 | 164.2 | 164.8 | 164.8 | ||||
|
| 6.52 (1H, d, 1.8) | 94.6 | 6.52 (1H, d, 1.8) | 93.7 | 6.49 (1H, d, 1.8) | 94.4 | 6.50 (1H, d, 1.8) | 93.5 |
|
| 157.8 | 156.5 | 157.8 | 157.8 | ||||
|
| 105.4 | 104.1 | 105.5 | 103.1 | ||||
|
| 122.7 | 120.9 | 122.8 | 121.7 | ||||
|
| 7.77(1H, d, 1.8) | 117.2 | 8.12 (1H, d, 9.0) | 130.7 | 7.76(1H, d, 2.4) | 117.1 | 8.08 (1H, d, 9.0) | 132.0 |
|
| 145.2 | 6.96 (1H, d, 8.4) | 115.1 | 145.2 | 6.97 (1H, d, 9.0) | 115.4 | ||
|
| 149.1 | 160.0 | 148.9 | 160.8 | ||||
|
| 6.94 (1H, d, 8.4) | 115.6 | 6.96 (1H, d, 8.4 | 115.1 | 6.95 (1H, d, 8.4) | 115.7 | 6.97 (1H, d, 9.0) | 115.4 |
|
| 7.68 (1H, dd, 1.8,8.4) | 123.1 | 8.12 (1H, d, 9.0) | 130.7 | 7.63 (1H, dd, 2.4,8.4) | 123.0 | 8.08 (1H, d, 9.0) | 132.0 |
|
| 5.30 (1H, d, 7.2) | 104.2 | 5.28 (1H, d, 7.8) | 101.3 | 5.61 (1H, d, 7.8) | 100.2 | 5.62 (1H, d, 7.8) | 100.1 |
|
| 3.40-3.52 (1H, m) | 75.2 | 3.45 (1H, dd, 7.8, 9.0) | 74.1 | 5.01 (1H, dd, 7.8, 9.6) | 75.0 | 4.97 (1H, dd, 8.4, 9.6) | 74.8 |
|
| 3.40-3.52 (1H, m) | 77.7 | 3.40 (1H, t, 9.0) | 76.4 | 3.70 (1H, t, 9.0) | 75.3 | 3.68 (1H, t, 9.0) | 75.2 |
|
| 3.40-3.52 (1H, m) | 70.6 | 3.48-3.54 (1H, m) | 70.1 | 3.42 (1H, dd, 9.0, 9.6) | 71.0 | 3.46 (1H, dd, 9.0, 9.6) | 71.2 |
|
| 3.40-3.52 (1H, m) | 75.1 | 3.48-3.54 (1H, m) | 74.1 | 3.55 (1H, dd, 1.8, 7.8) | 74.9 | 3.54 (1H, dd, 1.8, 7.8) | 75.0 |
|
| 4.11 (1H, dd, 5.4, 12.0) | 64.0 | 4.10 (1H, dd, 6.0, 12.0) | 63.2 | 4.12 (1H, dd, 5.4, 12.0) | 63.7 | 4.10 (1H, dd, 5.4, 12.0) | 63.8 |
| 4.22 (1H, dd, 1.8, 12.0) | 4.22 (1H, dd, 1.8, 12.0) | 4.24 (1H, dd, 1.8, 12.0) | 4.22 (1H, dd, 1.8, 12.0) | |||||
|
| 171.6 | 170.0 | 171.5 | 171.4 | ||||
|
| 2.52 (1H, d, 14.4, H-2”’A or H-2”’B) | 45.7 | 2.51 (1H, d, 14.4, H-2”’A or H-2”’B) | 45.7 | 2.51 (1H, d, 13.8, H-2”’A or H-2”’B) | 45.7 | 2.48 (1H, d, 13.8, H-2”’A or H-2”’B) | 45.7 |
| 2.56 (1H, d, 14.4, H-2”’A or H-2”’B ) | 2.56 (1H, d, 14.4, H-2”’A or H-2”’B ) | 2.54 (1H, d, 13.8, H-2”’A or H-2”’B ) | 2.51 (1H, d, 13.8, H-2”’A or H-2”’B ) | |||||
|
| 69.9 | 68.7 | 69.9 | 69.9 | ||||
|
| 2.50 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4‘”A or H-4”’B) | 45.1 | 2.52 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | 44.9 | 2.48 (1H, d,15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | 45.1 | 2.47 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | 45.0 |
| 2.59 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | 2.59 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | 2.56 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | 2.54 (1H, d, 15.6, H-4”’A or H-4”’B) | |||||
|
| 173.6 | 172.2 | 173.5 | 173.4 | ||||
|
| 1.23 (3H, s) | 27.5 | 1.24(3H, s) | 27.0 | 1.20 (3H, s) | 27.5 | 1.19 (3H, s) | 27.4 |
|
| 170.5 | 170.3 | ||||||
|
| 2.10 (3H, s) | 21.1 | 2.10 (3H, s) | 21.0 | ||||
Figure 2HPLC chromatograms (270 nm) of the (a) crude MeOH extract of G. paraguayense, (b) n-hexane extract, (c) EtOAc extract, (d) water extract, and (e) isolated flavonoid glycosides 1–4 (each 250 ppm). (Note: The impurity appearing at Rf 18 min on (e) is due to the contamination of compound 6.
Linear ranges, calibration curves, correlation coefficients, and detection limits for 1–4 analyzed using HPLC
| Compound | Linear range (μg /mL) | Linear equation | Squared correlation coefficient ( | LOD* (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2–500 | 0.9999 | 0.6 | |
|
| 4–500 | 0.9998 | 0.8 | |
|
| 2–500 | 0.9998 | 0.5 | |
|
| 2–500 | 0.9999 | 0.4 |
*LOD = 3 × SD/slope.
Figure 3Scavenging effects of the compounds 1–7 isolated from G. paraguayens on (A) DPPH, (B) ABTS radical, (C) reducing power, and (D) Fe2+/ascorbate-induced lipid peroxidation. Each value represents mean ± SD (n = 3). 1, quercetin 3-O-(6´´-HMG) -β-d-glucopyranoside; 2, kaempferol 3-O-(6´´-HMG) -β-d-glucopyranoside; 3,quercetin 3-O-(2´´-acetyl),(6´´-HMG) -β-d-glucopyranoside; 4, kaempferol 3-O-(2´´-acetyl),(6´´-HMG)-β-d-gluco-pyranoside; 5, quercetin 3-O-β-glucoside; 6, kaempferol 3-O-β-glucoside; 7, kaempferol.
50% Inhibition concentrations (IC ) for radical-scavenging activity and lipid peroxidation inhibition of compounds 1–7 isolated from
| Compound | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.88 ± 0.57 | 5.69 ± 0.31 | 10.76 ± 0.10 |
|
| 144.93 ± 3.56 | 96.81 ± 2.40 | 9.10 ± 0.17 |
|
| 8.40 ± 0.06 | 9.22 ± 0.67 | 46.54 ± 1.01 |
|
| 108.47 ± 6.94 | 152.21 ± 12.16 | 17.45 ± 0.18 |
|
| 11.06 ± 0.34 | 14.50 ± 1.24 | 1.67 ± 0.01 |
|
| 351.89 ± 17.53 | 277.44 ± 10.01 | 330.64 ± 12.63 |
|
| 19.18 ± 0.91 | 15.28 ± 0.06 | 2.96 ± 0.06 |
| Quercetin | 0.475 ± 0.00 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.00 |
Values are given as mean ± S.D. (n = 3).