Literature DB >> 28509833

Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Derek R Jenkins1, Andrew N Odland, Rafael J Sierra, Arlen D Hanssen, David G Lewallen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of a trabecular metal revision shell with metal augmentation to fill segmental or irregular defects during complex revision hip arthroplasty has been shown to provide good short-term results in prior published series. Longer-term results of the several cup-augment constructs used clinically are not known. The objective of this study was to report, with minimum 5-year radiographic and clinical follow-up, the outcome of these various constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: Eighty-four patients (85 hips) underwent revision total hip arthroplasty with use of porous tantalum augments between 2000 and 2007 at a single institution and were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-seven of the patients (58 hips) had clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 5 years. At the time of revision, the majority of the hips had acetabular defects classified as Paprosky Type 3A (28 of 58, 48%) or Type 3B (22 of 58, 38%). Eleven (19%) of the hips also had preoperative pelvic discontinuity. All hips were assessed clinically at a minimum of 5 years with use of the Mayo hip score. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for implant stability, the presence and location of radiolucent lines and healing of the discontinuity if present.
RESULTS: In 2 (3%) of the 58 hips, the constructs failed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component and re-revision was indicated. Six (10%) of the 58 hips demonstrated a radiolucent line between the trabecular metal shell and bone in DeLee and Charnley zone 3. In 1 hip that underwent re-revision and in 5 of the 6 hips with a zone-3 radiolucency, a pelvic discontinuity was present at the time of the index revision. The mean preoperative Mayo hip score was 35.7, which improved to 61.9 at 3 months and was 61.7 at the minimum 5-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: With failure defined as aseptic loosening requiring repeat revision surgery, this cohort demonstrated 97% survivorship and maintained satisfactory hip function at the minimum 5 years after the index revision surgery. Six of the 11 hips with preoperative pelvic discontinuity either failed or developed a radiolucency in zone 3 and are considered at risk for future revision. Pelvic discontinuity should prompt consideration of the addition of adjunctive fixation or the use of alternative techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28509833     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  James A Keeney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Strategies for cup revision].

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Modular revision strategy with bispherical augments in severe acetabular deficiency reconstruction.

Authors:  Guo-Yuan Li; Xiao-Qi Zhang; Min Chen; Zheng-Liang Luo; Xiao-Feng Ji; Xi-Fu Shang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  3D Printed Acetabular Components for Complex Revision Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angela Yao; Daniel Mark George; Vijai Ranawat; Chris John Wilson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Recovery of the Hip Rotation Center with Tantalum in Revision Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antônio Augusto Guimarães Barros; Victor Atsushi Kasuya Barbosa; Lincoln Paiva Costa; Euler de Carvalho Guedes; Carlos César Vassalo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

6.  The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qiang Xiao; Haoyang Wang; Kai Zhou; Duan Wang; Tingxian Ling; Fuxing Pei; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Pelvic discontinuity: a challenge to overcome.

Authors:  George C Babis; Vasileios S Nikolaou
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28

9.  Tantalum Augments Combined with Antiprotrusio Cages for Massive Acetabular Defects in Revision Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hinnerk Baecker; Sebastian Hardt; Matthew P Abdel; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-27

10.  Direct anterior approach or posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: A direct comparative study protocol.

Authors:  Lingchao Kong; Long Chen; Li Sun; Xiaobin Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.