Literature DB >> 16827864

Incompatible kidney donor candidates' willingness to participate in donor-exchange and non-directed donation.

A D Waterman1, E A Schenk, A C Barrett, B M Waterman, J R Rodrigue, E S Woodle, S Shenoy, M Jendrisak, M Schnitzler.   

Abstract

Although paired donation, list donation and non-directed donation allow more recipients to receive living donor transplants, policy makers do not know how willing incompatible potential donors are to participate. We surveyed 174 potential donors ruled out for ABO-incompatibility or positive cross-match about their participation willingness. They were more willing to participate in paired donation as compared to list donation where the recipient receives the next deceased donor kidney (63.8% vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001) or non-directed donation (63.8% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001). Their list donation willingness was greater when their intended recipients moved to the top versus the top 20% of the waiting list (37.9% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression modeling revealed that potential donors' empathy, education level, relationship with their intended recipient and the length of time their intended recipient was on dialysis also affected willingness. For paired donation, close family members of their intended recipient (odds ratio (OR) = 3.01, confidence intervals (CI) = 1.29, 7.02), with high levels of empathy (OR = 2.68, CI = 1.16, 6.21) and less than a college education (OR = 2.67, CI = 1.08, 6.61) were more willing to participate compared to other donors. Extrapolating these levels of willingness nationally, a 1-11% increase in living donation rates yearly (84-711 more transplants) may be possible if donor-exchange programs were available nationwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16827864     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

1.  Willingness of the United States general public to participate in kidney paired donation.

Authors:  Dorry L Segev; Neil R Powe; Misty U Troll; Nae-Yuh Wang; Robert A Montgomery; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Concerns of ABO incompatible and crossmatch-positive potential donors and recipients about participating in kidney exchanges.

Authors:  James R Rodrigue; Ruthanne Leishman; Tanya Vishnevsky; Amy Evenson; Didier A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Consideration of donor age and human leukocyte antigen matching in the setting of multiple potential living kidney donors.

Authors:  Michael D Rizzari; Thomas M Suszynski; Kristen J Gillingham; Arthur J Matas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Past, present and future of kidney paired donation transplantation in India.

Authors:  Vivek B Kute; Himanshu V Patel; Pankaj R Shah; Pranjal R Modi; Veena R Shah; Sayyed J Rizvi; Bipin C Pal; Manisha P Modi; Priya S Shah; Umesh T Varyani; Pavan S Wakhare; Saiprasad G Shinde; Vijay A Ghodela; Minaxi H Patel; Varsha B Trivedi; Hargovind L Trivedi
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2017-04-24

5.  Psychological characteristics and associations between living kidney transplantation recipients and biologically related or unrelated donors.

Authors:  Yujin Lee; Hyewon Park; Hee-Jung Jee; Heon-Jeong Lee; Jun Gyo Gwon; Hyeonjin Min; Cheol Woong Jung; Myung-Gyu Kim; Chul-Hyun Cho
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.