Literature DB >> 25591413

Polypectomy practices of sub-centimeter polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Said Din1,2, Alex J Ball3,4, Eleanor Taylor3, Matthew Rutter5,6, Stuart A Riley3, Shawinder Johal3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most colonic polyps are small, and several polypectomy techniques are available. We aimed to describe the variation in polypectomy techniques employed for the removal of sub-centimeter polyps in relation to polyp characteristics, completeness of histological excision and safety.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data relating to the removal of sub-centimeter polyps over a 3-year period (between January 2010 and December 2012) were retrieved from the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
RESULTS: A total of 147,174 sub-centimeter polyps were removed during 62,679 procedures. For pedunculated polyps, hot snare was most common in the left (median 92 %, IQR 83.3-97.0 %) and right colon (median 75 %, IQR 3-92 %). For non-pedunculated polyps, cold snare was most common in the right colon (median 24 %, IQR 9-47 %); whereas hot snare remained most common in the left colon (median 32 %, IQR 19-49 %). Surgeons were more likely than physicians to use diathermy-assisted techniques (65.6 vs. 56.5 %, p < 0.001). Twelve (0.03 %) bleeding episodes required transfusion with no polypectomy technique dominating and 16 (0.04 %) perforations with 81 % of polypectomies performed using diathermy-assisted techniques. There was substantial variation between screening centers for the completeness of histological excision. For non-pedunculated polyps, histologically confirmed complete excision was more after EMR (23.4 %) compared with other techniques (cold biopsy forceps 17.7 %, cold snare 15.1 %, hot biopsy forceps 19.1 %, hot snare 21.5 %). The use of cold techniques and EMR has increased over time, whereas the use of hot biopsy forceps and hot snare has decreased (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The removal of sub-centimeter polyps within the BCSP is safe despite wide variations in practice. The use of cold resection techniques and EMR has increased over time. The histological assessment for completeness of excision is limited and should be confirmed endoscopically at the time of polypectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Colonoscopy; Polypectomy; Sub-centimeter polyps

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25591413     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4064-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Colonoscopy and diminutive polyps: hot or cold biopsy or snare? Do I send to pathology?

Authors:  David G Hewett; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 2.  Advanced colon polypectomy.

Authors:  Klaus Mönkemüller; Helmut Neumann; Peter Malfertheiner; Lucia C Fry
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Matthew D Rutter; Roger G Blanks; Sue M Moss; Andrew F Goddard; Andrew Chilton; Claire Nickerson; Richard J Q McNally; Julietta Patnick; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Risk factors for adverse events related to polypectomy in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Claire Nickerson; Colin J Rees; Julietta Patnick; Roger G Blanks
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Peter V Draganov; Myron N Chang; Ahmad Alkhasawneh; Lisa R Dixon; John Lieb; Baharak Moshiree; Steven Polyak; Shahnaz Sultan; Dennis Collins; Amitabh Suman; John F Valentine; Mihir S Wagh; Samir L Habashi; Chris E Forsmark
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Yield of high-grade dysplasia based on polyp size detected at colonoscopy: a series of 2295 examinations following a positive fecal occult blood test in a population-based study.

Authors:  Jean-François Bretagne; Sylvain Manfredi; Christine Piette; Stéphanie Hamonic; Gérard Durand; Françoise Riou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee.

Authors:  D A Gilbert; A J DiMarino; D M Jensen; R Katon; M B Kimmey; L A Laine; B V MacFadyen; P A Michaletz-Onody; G Zuckerman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Colonoscopic polypectomy: current techniques and controversies.

Authors:  David G Hewett
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 10.  Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis—European recommendations.

Authors:  Phil Quirke; Mauro Risio; René Lambert; Lawrence von Karsa; Michael Vieth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Adoption of Optimal Small (6-9 mm) Colorectal Polyp Resection Technique Over Time.

Authors:  Larissa Muething; Bill Quach; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; Joshua A Smith; Robert T Simril; Amanda Tompkins; Jeannine Espinoza; Michelle L Cowan; Hazem Hammad; Sachin Wani; Swati G Patel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A prospective comparison of cold snare polypectomy using traditional or dedicated cold snares for the resection of small sessile colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Jeremy P Dwyer; Jonathan Y C Tan; Paul Urquhart; Robyn Secomb; Catherine Bunn; John Reynolds; Richard La Nauze; William Kemp; Stuart Roberts; Gregor Brown
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-10-27

4.  Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?

Authors:  Vasileios Panteris; Antonios Vezakis; J K Triantafillidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Indications for Cold Polypectomy Stratified by the Colorectal Polyp Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Takuji Kawamura; Yoji Takeuchi; Isao Yokota; Nobumasa Takagaki
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2020-04-28

6.  Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Toshiki Yamamoto; Sho Suzuki; Chika Kusano; Kyoko Yakabe; Maho Iwamoto; Hisatomo Ikehara; Takuji Gotoda; Mitsuhiko Moriyama
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.485

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.