| Literature DB >> 28507722 |
Yao Sun1,2, Mingmin Ding1, Xiaodong Zeng1, Yuling Xiao1, Huaping Wu1, Hui Zhou1, Bingbing Ding1, Chunrong Qu1, Wei Hou1, Aga Er-Bu3, Yejun Zhang4, Zhen Cheng5, Xuechuan Hong1,3.
Abstract
Though high brightness and biocompatible small NIR-II dyes are highly desirable in clinical or translational cancer research, their fluorescent cores are relatively limited and their synthetic processes are somewhat complicated. Herein, we have explored the design and synthesis of novel NIR-II fluorescent materials (H1) without tedious chromatographic isolation with improved fluorescence performance (QY ≈ 2%) by introducing 2-amino 9,9-dialkyl-substituted fluorene as a donor into the backbone. Several types of water-soluble and biocompatible NIR-II probes: SXH, SDH, and H1 NPs were constructed via different chemical strategies based on H1, and then their potential to be used in in vivo tumor imaging and image-guided surgery in the NIR-II region was explored. High levels of uptake were obtained for both passive and active tumor targeting probes SXH and SDH. Furthermore, high resolution imaging of blood vessels on tumors and the whole body of living mice using H1 NPs for the first time has demonstrated precise NIR-II image-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28507722 PMCID: PMC5418643 DOI: 10.1039/c7sc00251c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1Facile synthesis of compound H1.
Fig. 2(a) UV absorbance of H1 and NIR-II fluorescence emission of H1 with a peak at ∼1100 nm under an 808 nm excitation laser (exposure time: 10 ms). (b) Comparison of NIR-II signals of H1 and Q4 under an 808 nm excitation laser (exposure time: 20 ms). (c) Comparison of NIR-II signals of H1 under various long-pass (LP) filters (900–1400 nm). (d) Comparison of the photo-stability of H1 and IR-26 in dichloromethane under continuous 808 nm excitation for 1 h. (e) HOMO and LUMO orbital surfaces of H1 using the DFT B3LYP/6-31G(d) scrf = (cpcm, solvent = CH2Cl2) method. E gap = E LUMO – E HOMO.
Fig. 3(a) A schematic design of SXH showing four carboxylic acid groups of H1 conjugated with PEG1000 chains. (b) UV absorbance of SXH and NIR-II fluorescence emission of SXH with a peak at ∼1100 nm under an 808 nm excitation laser (solvents: water, exposure time: 10 ms). (c) Cellular toxicity of SXH with different doses (2, 4, 6, and 8 µM) in U87MG and L920 cells. (d) SXH agglomerated cumulative urine excretion curve during 24 h post-injection. (e) Non-specific targeting imaging of the U87MG tumor based on SXH under an 808 nm excitation (1000 LP and 200 ms).
Fig. 4(a) A schematic of SDH showing one of the carboxylic acid groups of H1 conjugated with targeted ligand RGD peptide. (b) UV absorbance and NIR-II fluorescence emission of SDH. (c) NIR-II signals of U87MG cell labelling by SDH and SDH + excess RGD as a blocking agent (block group) under 808 nm excitation (1000LP and 100 ms). (d) NIR-II images of U87MG tumor mice (n = 3) at different time points (1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h) after tail vein injection of SDH with or without the blocking agent RGD (500 µg) under 808 nm excitation (1000LP and 200 ms).
Fig. 5(a) A schematic of H1 NPs showing the H1 core and a hydrophilic PEG shell. (b) The TEM image of H1 NPs. (c) The NIR-II image of the blood vessels of the whole body and U87MG tumors after tail vein injection of H1 NPs under 808 nm excitation, 1000 LP and 100 ms; red arrows indicate the tumor. (d) NIR-II imaging-guided sentinel lymph node surgery on the C57BL/6J model (1000LP and 200 ms).