Literature DB >> 8051114

Selective recognition of cyclic RGD peptides of NMR defined conformation by alpha IIb beta 3, alpha V beta 3, and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins.

M Pfaff1, K Tangemann, B Müller, M Gurrath, G Müller, H Kessler, R Timpl, J Engel.   

Abstract

The binding of purified fibrinogen receptor alpha IIb beta 3, vitronectin receptor alpha V beta 3, and fibronectin receptor alpha 5 beta 1 to their corresponding ligands in solid-phase binding assays was used to examine the inhibitory activity of various linear and cyclic penta- and hexapeptides of different conformation containing RGD or RAD sequences. Cyclic peptides with different defined backbone conformations were designed by introducing a single D-amino acid or a proline at different positions in the ring. The data were calibrated for alpha IIb beta 3 integrin incorporated into a planar lipid bilayer by a physical method (total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy) which yielded KD = 1.7 microM for a linear RGD peptide and KD = 0.03 microM for fibrinogen. With this integrin, three cyclic hexapeptides ([GRGDFL], [ARGDFV], [GRGDFV]) were 2-4-fold more inhibitory than the linear GRGDS peptide in solid-phase assays and showed similar inhibition as the fibrinogen ligand. Six peptides had the same or a 2-fold lower activity as the linear reference peptide, and three peptides were up to 7-fold less active. Replacement of Arg or Asp by their stereoisomers or Gly by Ala resulted in a 100-1000-fold reduction in activity. With the two other integrins, a single cyclic pentapeptide [RGDFV] was 10-fold more active (alpha V beta 3) or equal in activity (alpha 5 beta 1) to linear GRGDS, while all of the other cyclic peptides were moderately or distinctly less active. Changes in the RGD sequence caused a less dramatic reduction in binding strength for alpha V beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 than for alpha II beta 3. Inhibitory activity was compared with the distance between the C beta atoms of Arg and Asp residues as determined by NMR and indicated that the optimum distance is in the range of 0.75-0.85 nm for alpha IIb beta 3 and at or below 0.67 nm for alpha V beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1. This indicates that alpha IIb beta 3 less sensitive to variations in the RGD backbone structure and can accommodate a larger distance than the integrins alpha V beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8051114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  100 in total

1.  RGD-dependent vacuolation and lumen formation observed during endothelial cell morphogenesis in three-dimensional fibrin matrices involves the alpha(v)beta(3) and alpha(5)beta(1) integrins.

Authors:  K J Bayless; R Salazar; G E Davis
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Neural stem cell adhesion and proliferation on phospholipid bilayers functionalized with RGD peptides.

Authors:  Badriprasad Ananthanarayanan; Lauren Little; David V Schaffer; Kevin E Healy; Matthew Tirrell
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Integrin Molecular Tension within Motile Focal Adhesions.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Jie Sun; Qian Xu; Farhan Chowdhury; Mehdi Roein-Peikar; Yingxiao Wang; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  RGD-conjugated two-photon absorbing near-IR emitting fluorescent probes for tumor vasculature imaging.

Authors:  Xiling Yue; Alma R Morales; Grace W Githaiga; Adam W Woodward; Simon Tang; Junko Sawada; Masanobu Komatsu; Xuan Liu; Kevin D Belfield
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-specific binding by foot-and-mouth disease viruses to the purified integrin alpha(v)beta3 in vitro.

Authors:  T Jackson; A Sharma; R A Ghazaleh; W E Blakemore; F M Ellard; D L Simmons; J W Newman; D I Stuart; A M King
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  [Serum-free cultivation of osteoprogenitor cells and osteoblasts to test biomaterials].

Authors:  N Duewelhenke; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Cell adhesion and response to synthetic nanopatterned environments by steering receptor clustering and spatial location.

Authors:  Elisabetta Ada Cavalcanti-Adam; Daniel Aydin; Vera Catherine Hirschfeld-Warneken; Joachim Pius Spatz
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2008-09-29

8.  Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration.

Authors:  Zhan Huang; Timothy D Sargeant; James F Hulvat; Alvaro Mata; Pablo Bringas; Chung-Yan Koh; Samuel I Stupp; Malcolm L Snead
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Cooperativity in adhesion cluster formation during initial cell adhesion.

Authors:  Christine Selhuber-Unkel; Mónica López-García; Horst Kessler; Joachim P Spatz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Tension sensing nanoparticles for mechano-imaging at the living/nonliving interface.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Kevin Yehl; Yoshie Narui; Khalid Salaita
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.