Literature DB >> 17050033

Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.

Robin Naidoo1, Andrew Balmford, Paul J Ferraro, Stephen Polasky, Taylor H Ricketts, Mathieu Rouget.   

Abstract

Recent studies that incorporate the spatial distributions of biological benefits and economic costs in conservation planning have shown that limited budgets can achieve substantially larger biological gains than when planning ignores costs. Despite concern from donors about the effectiveness of conservation interventions, these increases in efficiency from incorporating costs into planning have not yet been widely recognized. Here, we focus on what these costs are, why they are important to consider, how they can be quantified and the benefits of their inclusion in priority setting. The most recent work in the field has examined the degree to which dynamics and threat affect the outcomes of conservation planning. We assess how costs fit into this new framework and consider prospects for integrating them into conservation planning.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050033     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  91 in total

1.  Conservation science: Trade-in to trade-up.

Authors:  Peter Kareiva
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Rapid viability analysis for metapopulations in dynamic habitat networks.

Authors:  Martin Drechsler; Karin Johst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Fuller; Eve McDonald-Madden; Kerrie A Wilson; Josie Carwardine; Hedley S Grantham; James E M Watson; Carissa J Klein; David C Green; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Biodiversity conservation in Swedish forests: ways forward for a 30-year-old multi-scaled approach.

Authors:  Lena Gustafsson; Karin Perhans
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Using return on investment to maximize conservation effectiveness in Argentine grasslands.

Authors:  William Murdoch; Jai Ranganathan; Stephen Polasky; James Regetz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Measuring the value of groundwater and other forms of natural capital.

Authors:  Eli P Fenichel; Joshua K Abbott; Jude Bayham; Whitney Boone; Erin M K Haacker; Lisa Pfeiffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Review of agri-environment indexes and stewardship payments.

Authors:  Stefan Hajkowicz; Kerry Collins; Andrea Cattaneo
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation.

Authors:  Kwaw S Andam; Paul J Ferraro; Alexander Pfaff; G Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa; Juan A Robalino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data.

Authors:  Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group.

Authors:  Michael Bode; Kerrie A Wilson; Thomas M Brooks; Will R Turner; Russell A Mittermeier; Marissa F McBride; Emma C Underwood; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.