Literature DB >> 28500291

The complete chloroplast genome sequence of tung tree (Vernicia fordii): Organization and phylogenetic relationships with other angiosperms.

Ze Li1,2, Hongxu Long1,2, Lin Zhang1,2, Zhiming Liu1,2,3, Heping Cao4, Mingwang Shi5, Xiaofeng Tan6,7.   

Abstract

Tung tree (Vernicia fordii) is an economically important tree widely cultivated for industrial oil production in China. To better understand the molecular basis of tung tree chloroplasts, we sequenced and characterized its genome using PacBio RS II sequencing platforms. The chloroplast genome was sequenced with 161,528 bp in length, composed with one pair of inverted repeats (IRs) of 26,819 bp, which were separated by one small single copy (SSC; 18,758 bp) and one large single copy (LSC; 89,132 bp). The genome contains 114 genes, coding for 81 protein, four ribosomal RNAs and 29 transfer RNAs. An expansion with integration of an additional rps19 gene in the IR regions was identified. Compared to the chloroplast genome of Jatropha curcas, a species from the same family, the tung tree chloroplast genome is distinct with 85 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 82 indels. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that V. fordii is a sister species with J. curcas within the Eurosids I. The nucleotide sequence provides vital molecular information for understanding the biology of this important oil tree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28500291      PMCID: PMC5431841          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02076-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Tung tree (Vernicia fordii) belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family of woody angiosperms and has been cultivated for more than 1,000 years in China. Along with oil-tea tree (Camellia oleifera), walnut (Juglans regia) and Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum), tung tree is considered as one of the four major woody oil trees in China[1, 2]. Tung tree grows fast, blossoms and yields fruits in three years due to its high efficiency of photosynthesis. Tung oil extracted from seed kernels containing 80% eleostearic acid, which is active for chemical polymerization[1], and can be used as an ingredient in painting, varnishing, and other coating for enhancing adhesion and resistance to acid, alkali, frost and chemicals[3]. In recent years, tung oil has been shown with a potential for biodiesel production because tung tree grows fast with high oil yields[1, 4]. One approach to improve tung oil production would be to engineer chloroplasts with more efficient photosynthesis in tung tree leaves. Sequencing the complete chloroplast genome would facilitate the chloroplast transformation technique because the transformation of chloroplast genome has many advantages than nuclear transformation including a high level of transgene expression, lacking of gene silencing or positional effect and transgene containment[5-7]. Chloroplast (cp) is a special subcellular organelle which contains the entire enzymatic machinery for photosynthesis and provides essential energy for green plants[8-10]. Chloroplast contains its own small genome, which usually consists of a circular double-stranded DNA molecule[10, 11]. In angiosperms, cp genomes are 120–217 kb in length[12, 13]. Most of the cp genomes contain 110–130 distinct genes, approximately 80 genes coding for proteins involved in gene expression or photosynthesis[10, 14] and other genes coding for four rRNAs and 30 tRNAs[15, 16]. In addition, most cp genomes have four distinct regions, including a pair of inverted repeats (IRs, 20–28 kb), which are separated by a small single copy (SSC, 16–27 kb) region and a large single copy (LSC, 80–90 kb) region[14, 17, 18]. The cp genome can be used to investigate molecular evolution and phylogenies[14, 19]. Moreover, cp genomes are maternally inherited, which is beneficial in genetic engineering due to lack of cross-recombination[20, 21]. In this study, we determined the complete sequence of the chloroplast genome of tung tree using the PacBio RS II platform. Additionally, we compared it with other known cp genomes aiming to determine phylogenetic relationships among angiosperms.

Results

Genome sequencing, assembly and validation

Using the third-generation sequencing (PacBio RS II System), 18.26 Gb of raw sequence data was generated from tung tree cp genome through 2,910,237 reads with a mean read length of 6,273 bp. The sequence data that satisfied the quality control standards after filtering, were used to construct the cp genome by comparing with the reference cp genomes of other 908 species in NCBI plastid database. The longest recovered subread was 35,889 bp in length and the total amount of recovered subreads was 334 Mb. The depth of average genome coverage of the subreads exceeded 2000X, suggesting that the sequencing data was sufficient to meet the assembly requirements for cp genome. Finally, we obtained 2.4 M high quality reads with a mean read length of 6,762 bp and an N50 contig size of 17,719 bp. The results showed a high consensus of the sequences except 10 different bases between IRa and IRb regions. To ensure the accuracy for the tung tree cp genome, we compared the Sanger results with the assembled genome. The sequence of tung tree cp genome has been deposited in public databases (Genbank accession number: KY628420).

General features of tung tree cp genome

The total length of tung tree cp genome was determined to be 161,528 bp with the circular quadripartite structure similar to major angiosperms cp genomes. The cp genome contains a small single-copy (SSC) region of 18,758 bp and a large single-copy (LSC) region of 89,132 bp, separated by two copies of an inverted repeat (IR) of 26,819 bp (Fig. 1, Table 1). The genome is structured with 114 unique genes including 81 distinct protein-coding genes, four distinct rRNA genes and 29 distinct tRNA genes (Table 2). Seven tRNA genes and all of the rRNA genes are duplicated in the IR regions, making a total number of 135 genes (Tables 1 and 2). The genes coding for proteins, rRNA, tRNA, introns, and intergenic spacers (IGSs) are 82,034, 9048, 2742, 17,821, and 52,599 bp, which represent 50.79, 5.60, 1.70, 11.03, and 32.56% of the cp genome, respectively (Table 1). In this cp genome, 16 genes including 5 tRNA genes contain introns structure (Table 2).
Figure 1

Gene map of tung tree chloroplast genome from PacBio RS II platform. The thick lines indicate the inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) which separate the genome into large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions. Genes shown in the inner side of the circle are transcribed clockwise, and those located on the outside of the circle are transcribed counter-clockwise.

Table 1

Characteristics of tung tree plastome genome.

Sequence regionLength (bp)/Percent (%)
Total cp genome161,528 (100.00)
LSC89,132 (55.18)
SSC18,758 (11.61)
IR26,819 (16.60)
Coding regions91,388 (57.20)
Protein-coding regions82,034 (50.79)
Introns17,821 (11.03)
rRNA9,048 (5.60)
tRNA2,742 (1.70)
IGS52,599 (32.56)
GC content Length (bp)/Percent (%)
Overall GC size58,188 (36.02)
Overall A size52,378 (32.43)
Overall T size50,962 (31.55)
Overall G size29,615 (18.33)
Overall C size28,573 (17.69)
GC content in protein-coding regions30,780 (37.52)
GC content in IGS15,394 (29.27)
GC content in introns6,595 (37.01)
GC content in tRNA2,742 (53.17)
GC content in rRNA5,014 (55.42)
Gene classification Number
Total genes135
Protein-coding genes81
rRNA genes4
tRNA genes29
Genes with introns16
Genes duplicated by IR21
Table 2

Genes locating on tung tree cp genome.

Gene categoriesGroups of genesName of genes
Genes for photosynthesisSubunits of photosystem I psaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Subunits of photosystem II psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbL, psbM, psbN, psbT
Subunits of ATP synthase atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF b , atpH, atpI
Subunits of cytochrome b/f complex petA, petB b , petD b , petG, petL, petN
Subunits of NADH-dehydrogenase ndhA b , ndhB a,b , ndhC, ndhD, ndhE, ndhF, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI, ndhJ, ndhK
Large subunit of RuBisco rbcL
Self replicationRibosomal RNAs rrn16 a , rrn23 a , rrn4.5 a , rrn5 a
Transfer RNAs trnA-UGC a,b , trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnE-UUC, trnF-GAA, trnG-GCC, trnH-GUG, trnI-CAU a , trnI-GAU a,b , trnK-UUU b , trnL-CAA a , trnL-UAA b , trnL-UAG, trnM-CAU, trnfM-CAU, trnN-GUU a , trnP-UGG, trnQ-UUG, trnR-UCU, trnR-ACG a , trnS-UGA, trnS-GGA, trnS-GCU, trnT-GGU, trnT-UGU, trnW-CCA, trnY-GUA, trnV-UAC b , trnV-GAC a
Proteins of small ribosomal subunit rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 a , rps8, rps11, rps12 a,b , rps14, rps15, rps16, rps18, rps19 a
Proteins of large ribosomal subunit rpl2 a,b , rpl14, rpl16 b , rpl20, rpl22, rpl23 a , rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
Subunits of RNA polymerase rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1 b , rpoC2
Other genesAcetyl-CoA carboxylase accD
Cytochrome c biogenesis ccsA
Envelope membrane protein cemA
Maturase matK
Protease clpP b
Translation initiation factor infA
UnknownConserved hypothetical chloroplast reading frames ycf1 a , ycf2 a , ycf3 b , ycf4, ycf15 a , ycf68 a , lhbA

aGenes located in the IR regions.

bGenes having introns.

Gene map of tung tree chloroplast genome from PacBio RS II platform. The thick lines indicate the inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) which separate the genome into large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions. Genes shown in the inner side of the circle are transcribed clockwise, and those located on the outside of the circle are transcribed counter-clockwise. Characteristics of tung tree plastome genome. Genes locating on tung tree cp genome. aGenes located in the IR regions. bGenes having introns.

Comparison to the cp genomes from other Euphorbiaceae species

The size of the tung tree cp genome was found to be similar to those from Euphorbiaceae family species, J. curcas, H. brasiliensis and M. esculenta (Table 3). However, tung tree cp genome has the longest SSC region (18,758 bp), whereas J. curcas has the shortest SSC region (17,852 bp). Tung tree cp genome contains more genes (135) than other species, and among them 21 genes duplicated in IRs, while 16 genes duplicated in M. esculenta. As shown in Table 3, tung tree has the highest GC content (36.02%), while J. curcas has the lowest GC content (35.36%). Four conserved rRNAs were identified in every species. J. curcas and H. brasiliensis contain 78 coding genes, whereas M. esculenta has 79, and tung tree has 81 coding genes. Tung tree cp genome encodes 29 types of tRNAs, whereas H. brasiliensis and M. esculenta encode 30 (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of general features of Euphorbiaceae plastid genomes.

Genome feature Vernicia fordii Jatropha curcas Hevea brasiliensis Manihot esculenta
Total length (bp)161528163856161191161453
LSC length (bp)89132917568920989295
SSC length (bp)18758178521836218250
IR length (bp)26819271242681026954
GC content (%)36.0235.3635.7435.87
Total genes135130128128
Genes duplicated in IR21171916
rRNA gene duplicated in IR4444
Protein gene81787879
tRNA gene29283030
rRNA gene4444
Comparison of general features of Euphorbiaceae plastid genomes.

Repeat sequence analysis

The tung tree cp genome encloses 49 repeats with at least 21 base pairs (bp) per repeat unit (Table 4). These repeats include two complementary repeats, 21 direct (forward) repeats, 16 inverted (palindrome) repeats and 10 reverse repeats have 1,504 bp in length, which is about 0.93% of the genome. Most of these repeats are located in intergenic regions, while 8 repeats are located in the introns and in the protein-coding genes including psaA, ycf1 and ycf2.
Table 4

Repeat sequences in the tung tree cp genome.

No.Length (bp)Repeat typeRepeat 1 start positionRepeat 2 start positionRepeat 1 locationRepeat 2 location
122C4885478423trnfM-CAU_trnS-UGAtrnfM-CAU_trnS-UGA
226C104466146168ycf15_trnV-GACycf15_trnV-GAC
321F7396146181rpoA_psbNrpoA_psbN
424F2537225405psbJ_atpBpsbJ_atpB
567F3371733766trnV-UAC_ndhCtrnV-UAC_ndhC
629F3373833833trnV-UAC_ndhCtrnV-UAC_ndhC
729F3378733833trnV-UAC_ndhCtrnV-UAC_ndhC
835F4369545919psaApsaA
953F5371075960trnS-UGA_trnE-UUCtrnS-UGA_trnE-UUC
1023F5529055312trnS-UGA_trnE-UUCtrnS-UGA_trnE-UUC
1123F5675156772trnD-GUC_psbMtrnD-GUC_psbM
1230F7807878104atpA_trnS-GCUatpA_trnS-GCU
1326F7815978176atpA_trnS-GCUatpA_trnS-GCU
1434F7833378353atpA_trnS-GCUatpA_trnS-GCU
1525F8378183806rps16_trnK-UUUrps16_trnK-UUU
1622F8378483831rps16_trnK-UUUrps16_trnK-UUU
1723F8380983831rps16_trnK-UUUrps16_trnK-UUU
1862F9662096656ycf2ycf2
1926F9662096692ycf2ycf2
2026F117126117141ycf1ycf1
2125F134591134653ndhF_trnN-GUUndhF_trnN-GUU
2262F153942153978trnL-CAA_trnI-CAUtrnL-CAA_trnI-CAU
2326F153942154014trnL-CAA_trnI-CAUtrnL-CAA_trnI-CAU
2421P7396104458rpoA_psbNrpoA_psbN
2524P2267822678psbJ_atpBpsbJ_atpB
2622P3368233682trnV-UAC_ndhCtrnV-UAC_ndhC
2729P3974480476rps4_ycf3rps4_ycf3
2821P3974949846rps4_ycf3rps4_ycf3
2926P4802348023trnfM-CAU_trnS-UGAtrnfM-CAU_trnS-UGA
3022P4886279778trnfM-CAU_trnS-UGAtrnfM-CAU_trnS-UGA
3152P5730257302psbM_rpoBpsbM_rpoB
3222P7473274732atpH_atpFatpH_atpF
3358P8900389003trnH-GUG_ycf2trnH-GUG_ycf2
3462P96620153942ycf2ycf2
3526P96620153942ycf2ycf2
3662P96656153978ycf2ycf2
3726P96692154014ycf2ycf2
3822P117973117973ycf1ycf1
3928P131410131410ndhD_ndhFndhD_ndhF
4023R45444544rpl36_rps11rpl36_rps11
4121R1979819798trnW-CCA_psbEtrnW-CCA_psbE
4221R2267222672psbJ_atpBpsbJ_atpB
4324R4863748637trnfM-CAU_trnS-UGAtrnfM-CAU_trnS-UGA
4426R6527665276rpoC1rpoC1
4522R7800978009atpA_trnS-GCUatpA_trnS-GCU
4622R7802978061atpA_trnS-GCUatpA_trnS-GCU
4731R7803078030atpA_trnS-GCUatpA_trnS-GCU
4826R104466104466ycf15_trnV-GACycf15_trnV-GAC
4926R146168146168trnN-GUU_rps7trnN-GUU_rps7

C: complement repeats, F: forward repeats, P: palindrome repeats, R: reverse repeats.

Repeat sequences in the tung tree cp genome. C: complement repeats, F: forward repeats, P: palindrome repeats, R: reverse repeats.

Simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis

81 SSR loci were identified, including 63 mononucleotide SSR loci (77.78%), five dinucleotide SSR loci (6.17%), and 13 other types of SSR loci (16.05%). Among them, there are 79 A or T repeats, one G repeat and one AG dinucleotide repeat. These SSR loci represent 0.937% of the complete cp sequence. 64 of the 81 SSR loci are located in intergenic regions, eight in gene-coding regions, six in intron regions, two between the gene-coding and intron regions, and only one between the intergenic regions and gene codingregions (see Supplementary Table S1).

Variation analysis

By comparing with the cp genome sequences from V. fordii and J. curcas, a total of 85 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) and 82 indels were identified. atpF/atpA is the most variable in the IGS within the LSC region (21.05% of variability). V. fordii and M. esculenta have identified 86 SNPs and 81 indels. Among them, 69 SNPs and 74 indels are within LSC region, 12 SNPs and seven indels are within SSC region. trnV-UAC/ndhC is the most variable in the IGS within the LSC region (16.96% of variability) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

The variation analysis within intergenic spacer (IGS) regions between V. fordii and J. curcas or M. esculenta.

The variation analysis within intergenic spacer (IGS) regions between V. fordii and J. curcas or M. esculenta.

IR contraction and expansion

Although IRs are the most conserved regions in cp DNA, the expansion and contraction at the borders of the IR regions are common evolutionary events, causing size variation of cp genomes[22, 23]. The IR-LSC and IR-SSC borders of tung tree cp genome were compared to those of the five basal eudicots (J. curcas, M. esculenta, H. brasiliensis, B. sinica, and N. tabacum). In all plant species, the IRb/SSC borders extend into the ycf1 genes to create long ycf1 pseudogenes with variable length. The length of ycf1 pseudogene is 1,221 bp in tung tree, 2,200 bp in J. curcas, 1,397 bp in H. brasiliensis and 1,027 bp in N. tabacum. In addition, the ycf1 pseudogene and the ndhF gene overlap M. esculenta and B. sinica cp genomes by 46 bp and 20 bp, respectively, but the ndhF genes of the other 4 species are all located in the SSC region, and it ranges from 274 bp from the IRb/LSC border in tung tree cp genome (Fig. 3). The trnH-GIG sequences are found in LSC regions of all cp genomes. This gene is 209 bp from the IRa/LSC border in tung tree cp genome. The rps19 sequence is detected in the IR regions of tung tree cp genome and 8 bp apart from the LSC/IRb border, whereas this gene is located in the LSC in J. curcas, B. sinica and N. tabacum. In addition, the rps19 gene is observed at the IRb/LSC border of two Euphorbiaceae plants, M. esculenta and H. brasiliensis (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Comparison of the border regions of LSC, IR and SSC among six chloroplast genomes of basal eudicots.

Comparison of the border regions of LSC, IR and SSC among six chloroplast genomes of basal eudicots.

Phylogenetic Analysis

To analyze the V. fordii phylogenetic position within asterid lineage, we aligned 55 complete cp genome sequences using the 36 protein-coding genes. The species representing 24 orders and included 3 outgroup taxa. The sequence analysis showed a fully resolved phylogenetic tree (12,995 in length of 0.51 for consistency index and 0.65 for retention index) (Fig. 4). The phylogenetic trees generated by ML and MP alignment have similar topologies (Figs 4 and S1). There are a total of 7,609 positions in the final dataset. V. fordii is placed as sister to J. curcas with a bootstrap (96). V. fordii is grouped to Malpighiales with J. curcas. There is a sister relationship among Falales, Cucurbitalesand Rosales.
Figure 4

The maximum parsimony (MP) phylogenetic tree based on 36 protein-coding genes in the chloroplast genome. The numbers in each node was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates.

The maximum parsimony (MP) phylogenetic tree based on 36 protein-coding genes in the chloroplast genome. The numbers in each node was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates.

Discussion

The entire chloroplast genome of tung tree was determined using the third-generation sequencing (PacBio RS II System) method and assembled with the chloroplast genomes of the other Euphorbiaceae plants using the cp genomes of J. curcas and M. esculenta as references. The genome sequence was confirmed by Sanger sequencing of PCR-based products using specific primers (see Supplementary Table S2). As shown in Figure 1, the tung tree cp genome is a typical circle DNA, similar to those from Euphorbiaceae[7, 13, 24]. Repeat sequences are useful for studying genome rearrangement and play an important role in phylogenetic analysis[25]. There are 49 repeats in the tung tree cp genome. A large number of repeats are distributed within IGS regions and the IRs account for the majority of repeats. In addition, we also find many repeats are present in the ycf2 gene including two forward repeats and four palindrome repeats. The results are similar to those of previous studies on Jatropha curcas [13], Citrus sinensis [16] and Vitis[26]. Meanwhile, the non-coding regions in cp genomes are important for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms[27]. Most of the repeats are found in the non-coding regions of the tung tree cp genome. In tung tree cp genome, 81 SSR loci with a length of at least 10 bp were identified (Table S1). All of the dinucleotides are composed of multiple copies of AT/TA repeats, and 75 of them are detected in the noncoding regions. These findings are similar to those of the other published results, i,e., repeats are typically found in the noncoding regions, especially in IGS regions of the cp genomes[17, 28, 29]. The SSRs in cp genomes was first reported in Pinus radiata [30]. These SSRs can be useful biomarkers for genetic diversity. The border regions of LSC-IRa, IRa-SSC, SSC-IRb and IRb-LSC represent highly variable regions with many nucleotide changes in cp genomes of closely related species. We compared the IR boundary regions of cp genome from six species in this study. The border of tung tree cp genome is differed slightly from that of other cp genomes. At the IRb and SSC border, the intergenic region of ycf1 and ndhF in tung tree cp genome is larger (274 bp) than those in other species[13]. In addition, the SSC region in tung tree cp genome is also larger than those in other species. The long distance of IRb and SSC border could be a result of the expanding chloroplast genome of tung tree. The rps19 gene of tung tree is entirely located in the IR regions, which is generally located in the LSC region or at the junction of LSC/IRb border in dicotyledons[31-33]. Previous studies have shown that rps19 sequence is generally positioned in the IR regions of cp genomes from monocotyledon pineapple (Ananas comosus)[34], and Chionographis japonica [35]. Our results indicate that the rps19 gene location is similar to monocotyledon. In Euphorbiaceae, though the IR region of tung tree cp genome is shorter than that of J. curcas and M. esculenta, it has more duplicated genes (21 genes) than those of J. curcas (17 genes) and M. esculenta (16 genes). The main reasons for these differences are that the rps19 gene is duplicated in IR regions and that the ycf15 and ycf68 genes are found in tung tree; which are consistent with those results obtained from Hevea brasiliensis [7] and Musa acuminata [36]. Meanwhile, ycf15 and ycf68 genes were identified as pseudogenes in tung tree, and ycf68 sequence is found in the intron regions of trnI-GAU. The similar result has been reported in the cp genome sequence of Pelargonium hortorum [15]. It is reported that cp genomes in most land plants have two identical IR regions, which have lower the nucleotide substitution rates and fewer indels than LSC and SSC regions[37]. Similarly, few indels were identified in the IR regions of tung tree cp genome. IGSs and intron regions have more indels than protein-coding genes and thus evolve more quickly than protein-coding genes. Traditionally the nucleotide substitutions and indels in cp genomes have been used as DNA markers in the phylogenetic analysis of many land plants[38-40]. In the Euphorbiaceae family several studies have analyzed the phylogenetic relationship based on chloroplast DNA sequences[7, 13, 24]. The phylogenetic evolution of V. fordii were studied here using 36 protein coding genes for 55 plant taxa (Supplementary Table S3), including 52 angiosperms and three outgroup gymnosperms (Ginkgo, Larix and Pinus). We used MP and ML analyses to construct an evolutionary tree involving 55 amino acid sequences. All 52 nodes were resolved well and reliable based on MP bootstrap value: 41 have strong bootstrap support of 95–100% and 11 have moderate support of 60–95%. V. fordii and the other four species in the family Euphorbiaceae are clustered into Malpighiales as a well-supported monophyly and placed within Eurosids I, which is similar to pervious work[41]. The phylegenetic tree indicates that subfamily Crotonoideae is a younger, more evolved group than subfamily Acalyphoideae (i.e. Ricinus in this study). However, the deep phylogeny within angiosperms differ from previous research in several ways[42, 43]. In our analysis, monocots forms a sister group to the remaining angiosperms, although it is often embedded in dicots in other studies. One possible reason is the heterogeneity between the nuclear and chloroplast genomes[44, 45]. There are a few disparities between the MP and ML trees in our analyses. This might be because maximum parsimony is sensitive to incongruent evolutionary rates at internal nodes[46]. In addition, V. fordii is suggested to be more closely related to Jatropha than to Hevea and Manihot.

Conclusion

We presented the first complete nucleotide sequence of tung tree cp genome using PacBio RS II sequencing platforms. The tung tree cp genome (161,528 bp) was fully characterized and compared to the cp genomes of related species. We identified two inverted repeat regions and one small and one large single copy regions. The tung tree cp genome contained 114 unique genes coded for 81 proteins, four ribosomal RNAs and 29 transfer RNAs. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that V. fordii is a sister species of J. curcas within the Eurosids I. Our study provides vital molecular information for understanding of the cp genome of this commercially important woody oil tree.

Material and Methods

Plant materials and DNA sequencing

Tung tree leaves were obtained from a two years old self-bred progeny plant at Central South University of Forestry and Technology Germplasm Repository (CSUFTGR) (110° 29′ E, 28° 32′ N, Yong Shun, Ji Shou, Hunan, China). Based on the manufacturer’s instructions, the whole genomic DNA was extracted from 5 g of fresh leaves with DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, CA, USA). After DNA was purified, 5 mg was used in library construction. In addition, a PacBio RS II platform[47] was used for sequencing tung tree cp genome (Nextomics, Wu Han, China).

Genome assembly and annotation

All sequenced reads were filtered through removing the adapter sequence and cutting off low quality bases in reads and assembled by HGAP 2.3.0 process[48], Celera assembler (CA) assembled software[49] and OLC assembly algorithm[50]. The cp genome was annotated using Dual Organellar GenoMe Annotator (DOGMA)[51] and CPGAVAS (http://www.herbalgenomics.org/0506/cpgavas/analyzer/annotate). The predicted annotations were confirmed by BLAST[52] search against the nucleotide database of NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf). Uncertain annotations for protein-coding sequences, tRNAs and mRNAs genes were corrected after being compared with near edge species.

Genome Validation

Because chloroplast genomes exhibit a greater degree of conservation in most of the plants, we compared the complete cp genome sequences among tung tree, Jatropha [NC_012224], and Manihot [EU117376] in NCBI plastid database. The sequence discrepancies between tung tree and Jatropha or Manihot cp genome sequences were validated by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. Ten different bases between IRa and IRb regions were also amplified by PCR. PCR were used to verify differences in the sequence of the preliminary cp genome assembly using 29 pairs of forward and reverse primers (see Supplementary Table S2).

Analysis of cp genome sequence

GenomeVx software[53] was used to draw the circular map of the tung tree chloroplast genome. Mauve software[12] and mVISTA program were applied to identify similarities among different cp genomes (http://genome.lbl.gov/vista/mvista/submit.shtml)[54]. REPuter[55] was utilized to identify forward (direct) repeats, reverse sequences, complementary and palindromic sequences with at least 21 bp in length and 90% of sequence identity. The distributions of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were predicted using the microsatellite search tool MISA[56]. Insertions and deletions (indels), as well as nucleotide substitutions and inversions were scored as single independent characters. The formula (NS + ID)/L × 100 (NS, nucleotide substitutions number; ID, indels number; L, the aligned sequence length) was used to calculate the ratio of mutation events. In addition, the contraction/expansion regions of the inverted repeat (IR) were compared among V. fordii, J. curcas, M. esculenta, H. brasiliensis, B. sinica, and N. tabacum.

Phylogenetic analysis

Fifty-two angiosperm and three gymnosperm taxa typically possess a set of 36 protein-coding genes: atpA, atpB, atpE, atpH, atpI, petA, petB, petD, petG, petN, psaA, psaB, psaJ, psbA, psbC, psbD, psbF, psbH, psbJ, psbK, psbM, psbN, psbT, matK, rbcL, rpl33, rpoA, rpoB, rps2, rps3, rps4, rps8, rps18, rps11, rps14, and ccsA. These genes are present in all 55 cp genomes published in the NCBI database (see Supplementary Table S3). The maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) were performed to infer the evolutionary relationship. MUSCLE[57] was used to align sequences followed by manual adjustment. MEGA*6.0[58] was used for MP analysis using a heuristic search selected. Bootstrap analysis was done with 1,000 replicates with TBR branch swapping. ML analysis was conducted using FastTree v2.1.3[59, 60] with the default parameters. The nucleotide substitution model we chose was GTRGAMMA model, which was the common model reported in the literature. The 1000 replications were used to calculate local bootstrap probability of each branch. Supplementary Figure S1 Supplementary Dataset 1 Supplementary Dataset 2 Supplementary Dataset 3
  46 in total

Review 1.  Engineering the plastid genome of higher plants.

Authors:  Pal Maliga
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.834

2.  FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments.

Authors:  Morgan N Price; Paramvir S Dehal; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.).

Authors:  Meng Yang; Xiaowei Zhang; Guiming Liu; Yuxin Yin; Kaifu Chen; Quanzheng Yun; Duojun Zhao; Ibrahim S Al-Mssallem; Jun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns.

Authors:  Robert K Jansen; Zhengqiu Cai; Linda A Raubeson; Henry Daniell; Claude W Depamphilis; James Leebens-Mack; Kai F Müller; Mary Guisinger-Bellian; Rosemarie C Haberle; Anne K Hansen; Timothy W Chumley; Seung-Bum Lee; Rhiannon Peery; Joel R McNeal; Jennifer V Kuehl; Jeffrey L Boore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids.

Authors:  Robert K Jansen; Charalambos Kaittanis; Christopher Saski; Seung-Bum Lee; Jeffrey Tomkins; Andrew J Alverson; Henry Daniell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  The advantages of SMRT sequencing.

Authors:  Richard J Roberts; Mauricio O Carneiro; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  A precise chloroplast genome of Nelumbo nucifera (Nelumbonaceae) evaluated with Sanger, Illumina MiSeq, and PacBio RS II sequencing platforms: insight into the plastid evolution of basal eudicots.

Authors:  Zhihua Wu; Songtao Gui; Zhiwu Quan; Lei Pan; Shuzhen Wang; Weidong Ke; Dequan Liang; Yi Ding
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Comparative chloroplast genomics: analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus.

Authors:  Linda A Raubeson; Rhiannon Peery; Timothy W Chumley; Chris Dziubek; H Matthew Fourcade; Jeffrey L Boore; Robert K Jansen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Chloroplast genome structure in Ilex (Aquifoliaceae).

Authors:  Xin Yao; Yun-Hong Tan; Ying-Ying Liu; Yu Song; Jun-Bo Yang; Richard T Corlett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  17 in total

1.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dodonaea viscosa: comparative and phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Josphat K Saina; Andrew W Gichira; Zhi-Zhong Li; Guang-Wan Hu; Qing-Feng Wang; Kuo Liao
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Characteristics and comparative analysis of Mesona chinensis Benth chloroplast genome reveals DNA barcode regions for species identification.

Authors:  Danfeng Tang; Yang Lin; Fan Wei; Changqian Quan; Kunhua Wei; Yanyan Wei; Zhongquan Cai; Muhammad Haneef Kashif; Jianhua Miao
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Actinidia arguta using the PacBio RS II platform.

Authors:  Miaomiao Lin; Xiujuan Qi; Jinyong Chen; Leiming Sun; Yunpeng Zhong; Jinbao Fang; Chungen Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Complete chloroplast genome sequence of the mangrove species Kandelia obovata and comparative analyses with related species.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Ying Zhang; Yukai Chen; Juma Gul; Jingwen Zhang; Qiang Liu; Qing Chen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Evolution of plastid genomes of Holcoglossum (Orchidaceae) with recent radiation.

Authors:  Zhang-Hai Li; Xiao Ma; De-Yi Wang; Yun-Xia Li; Cheng-Wang Wang; Xiao-Hua Jin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Comparative Chloroplast Genomics of Endangered Euphorbia Species: Insights into Hotspot Divergence, Repetitive Sequence Variation, and Phylogeny.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Sajjad Asaf; Abdul Latif Khan; Tariq Shehzad; Ahmed Al-Rawahi; Ahmed Al-Harrasi
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of a hybrid blackberry (Rubus spp.) cultivar.

Authors:  Xun-Ju Liu; Xiao-Rong Wang; Hao-Ru Tang; Qing Chen
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 0.658

8.  Chloroplast genome analyses and genomic resource development for epilithic sister genera Oresitrophe and Mukdenia (Saxifragaceae), using genome skimming data.

Authors:  Luxian Liu; Yuewen Wang; Peizi He; Pan Li; Joongku Lee; Douglas E Soltis; Chengxin Fu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Two Lespedeza Species: Insights into Codon Usage Bias, RNA Editing Sites, and Phylogenetic Relationships in Desmodieae (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae).

Authors:  Yamuna Somaratne; De-Long Guan; Wen-Qiang Wang; Liang Zhao; Sheng-Quan Xu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-31

10.  Effects of Low-Temperature Stress and Brassinolide Application on the Photosynthesis and Leaf Structure of Tung Tree Seedlings.

Authors:  Fanhang Zhang; Kun Lu; Yiyang Gu; Lin Zhang; Wenying Li; Ze Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.