Oliver Rauh1, Martin Urban2, Leonhard M Henkes2, Tobias Winterstein1, Timo Greiner1, James L Van Etten3, Anna Moroni4, Stefan M Kast2, Gerhard Thiel1, Indra Schroeder1. 1. Plant Membrane Biophysics, Technical University Darmstadt , 64289 Darmstadt, Germany. 2. Physikalische Chemie III, Technische Universität Dortmund , 44227 Dortmund, Germany. 3. Department of Plant Pathology and Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska Lincoln , Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0900, United States. 4. Department of Biosciences and CNR IBF-Mi, Università degli Studi di Milano , 20122 Milano, Italy.
Abstract
Gating of ion channels is based on structural transitions between open and closed states. To uncover the chemical basis of individual gates, we performed a comparative experimental and computational analysis between two K+ channels, KcvS and KcvNTS. These small viral encoded K+ channel proteins, with a monomer size of only 82 amino acids, resemble the pore module of all complex K+ channels in terms of structure and function. Even though both proteins share about 90% amino acid sequence identity, they exhibit different open probabilities with ca. 90% in KcvNTS and 40% in KcvS. Single channel analysis, mutational studies and molecular dynamics simulations show that the difference in open probability is caused by one long closed state in KcvS. This state is structurally created in the tetrameric channel by a transient, Ser mediated, intrahelical hydrogen bond. The resulting kink in the inner transmembrane domain swings the aromatic rings from downstream Phes in the cavity of the channel, which blocks ion flux. The frequent occurrence of Ser or Thr based helical kinks in membrane proteins suggests that a similar mechanism could also occur in the gating of other ion channels.
Gating of ion channels is based on structural transitions between open and closed states. To uncover the chemical basis of individual gates, we performed a comparative experimental and computational analysis between two K+ channels, KcvS and KcvNTS. These small viral encoded K+ channel proteins, with a monomer size of only 82 amino acids, resemble the pore module of all complex K+ channels in terms of structure and function. Even though both proteins share about 90% amino acid sequence identity, they exhibit different open probabilities with ca. 90% in KcvNTS and 40% in KcvS. Single channel analysis, mutational studies and molecular dynamics simulations show that the difference in open probability is caused by one long closed state in KcvS. This state is structurally created in the tetrameric channel by a transient, Ser mediated, intrahelical hydrogen bond. The resulting kink in the inner transmembrane domain swings the aromatic rings from downstream Phes in the cavity of the channel, which blocks ion flux. The frequent occurrence of Ser or Thr based helical kinks in membrane proteins suggests that a similar mechanism could also occur in the gating of other ion channels.
Ion channels fluctuate
stochastically between conductive “open”
states and nonconductive “closed” states.[1] This process of gating determines the flux of
ions across membranes and is therefore a crucial parameter for the
regulation of channel activity in the physiological context. Many
physical factors like voltage or mechanical stretch and chemical factors
like ligands or signaling molecules can modulate the stability of
individual closed or open states and as a consequence regulate ion
fluxes across membranes. The recent availability of high-resolution
structures of channel proteins makes it possible to correlate experimentally
measured gating events from single channel recordings with dynamic
structural phenomena.[2,3] Well documented correlations between
channel gating and structural modifications are known from the model
K+ channel KcsA. Two gates have been identified in this
channel. One gate is located at the inner bundle crossing and is activated
by H+. The second gate is in the selectivity filter. Additional
structure/function studies have uncovered some electrostatic interactions
among amino acid (AA) side chains, which are presumably responsible
for the stochastic switching between open and closed states of the
channel. For the H+ dependent gating in the KcsA channel
a complex network of inter- and intrasubunit salt bridges and hydrogen
bonds were identified near the bundle crossing; these are stabilized
or destabilized according to pH.[3] In the
case of the KcsA filter gate a network of AA side chains surrounding
the selectivity filter together with the ions in the filter and water
behind the filter affect the stability of the conformational states
of the pore. A key role in this network is played by a single carboxyl-carboxylate
interaction between a Glu (E71) in the pore helix and an Asp (D80)
in the signature sequence. Substitution of E71 with Ala (E71A) led
to a complete disappearance of inactivation and a constitutively open
channel at low pH.[2]Here we use small
chlorovirus encoded K+ channels to
search for additional structural motives for ion channel gating. These
channels, which represent the pore module of complex K+ channels,[4] have the advantage of being
truly minimal because they consist of two transmembrane domains, a
pore loop, short N and C termini and small extracellular loops (Figure a). Like other K+ channels they form functional tetramers and have many functional
properties present in more complex K+ channels. These properties
include K+ selectivity, a susceptibility to blockers and,
important for this study, stochastic gating between defined open and
closed states.[5,6] By using K+ channel
genes from chloroviruses isolated from different environments we have
created a large library of structural orthologs, which exhibit distinct
functional differences.[7,8] In the present study we analyzed
two small K+ channel orthologs, which differ in the presence
or absence of a long-lived closed state, even though they have high
AA identity. Comparative analysis of the two channels identified a
Phe in the inner transmembrane helix as a gate, which can obstruct
the ion pathway in the cavity. The stochastic insertion and removal
of the hydrophobic barrier is achieved by the formation of H-bonds
between an adjacent Ser with upstream-positioned AAs in the transmembrane
helix. Hence stochastic gating of this long-lived closed state presumably
reflects the formation of a kink in the inner transmembrane helix.
This in turn causes an orientation of the Phe in the ionic pathway
where it functions as a barrier of ion flux.
Figure 1
Chlorovirus encoded K+ channels. (a) Cartoon representations
of a snapshot of KcvS taken from MD simulation at 80 ns
of the production run. Left: Side view of the channel (two opposing
monomer units). Right: view from bottom to top of the full tetrameric
channel. Potassium ions are shown as red spheres, and F78 as explicit
side chains in red. (b) Sequence alignment of three viral encoded
K+ channels. The position of the transmembrane domains
TMD1 and TMD2 as well as the pore helix are indicated by bars. The
sequences are 86% identical; amino acid differences are highlighted
in gray.
Chlorovirus encoded K+ channels. (a) Cartoon representations
of a snapshot of KcvS taken from MD simulation at 80 ns
of the production run. Left: Side view of the channel (two opposing
monomer units). Right: view from bottom to top of the full tetrameric
channel. Potassium ions are shown as red spheres, and F78 as explicit
side chains in red. (b) Sequence alignment of three viral encoded
K+ channels. The position of the transmembrane domains
TMD1 and TMD2 as well as the pore helix are indicated by bars. The
sequences are 86% identical; amino acid differences are highlighted
in gray.
Results and Discussion
Two Similar Channels with
Different Open Probabilities
The viral encoded proteins KcvNTS and KcvS are
small K+ channels with only 82 AAs per monomer. The two
proteins differ in 11 AAs of which 8 are conservative and 3 are semiconservative
exchanges (Figure b). The difference between KcvNTS and a third channel
KcvATCV-1, which was analyzed previously,[9] is only four AAs. When reconstituted in planar
lipid bilayers, KcvNTS and KcvS generated channel
fluctuations with a similar unitary conductance and the same characteristic i/V relation (Figure a–c). The latter is characterized
by an Ohmic conductance at positive voltages and a negative slope
conductance at negative voltages. The decrease in channel amplitude
at negative voltages is caused by a rapid flickering of the channel,
which results in unresolved channel openings (Figure a,b).[6] These recordings
imply that the AA deviations between the two channels have no large
impact on the unitary conductance and on fast gating, which is presumably
dominated by a selectivity filter gate.[6]
Figure 2
The
difference in open probability of two similar K+ channels
originates from a long closed time, which is absent in
KcvNTS and present in KcvS. (a,b) Characteristic
single channel fluctuations of KcvNTS and KcvS at different voltages in a planar lipid bilayer. The closed (C)
and open (O) levels are indicated along the current traces. (c) Mean
single channel i/V relations (±sd)
of KcvNTS (open squares) and KcvS (filled squares)
from 6 and 9 independent recordings, respectively. (d) Mean open probabilities
(±sd) of the two channels from 6 and 9 independent recordings.
Exemplary closed dwell times at +120 mV for KcvNTS (e)
and KcvS (f). The data in e can be fitted with two exponentials
while the data in f require a third exponential. The long-lived closed
state in f is absent in e. The multiple kinetic variables of the two
channels including the probabilities (P) for occupying the open state
(O) and the closed states (C1–C3) (g) as well as mean lifetimes
(in ms) of the open state (τo) and of the three closed
states (τc1–τc3) (h) are
presented in two-dimensional radar plots. The probabilities of occupancy
and mean lifetimes were calculated from three independent 5 min recordings.
The symbols in d, g and h correspond to those in c.
The
difference in open probability of two similar K+ channels
originates from a long closed time, which is absent in
KcvNTS and present in KcvS. (a,b) Characteristic
single channel fluctuations of KcvNTS and KcvS at different voltages in a planar lipid bilayer. The closed (C)
and open (O) levels are indicated along the current traces. (c) Mean
single channel i/V relations (±sd)
of KcvNTS (open squares) and KcvS (filled squares)
from 6 and 9 independent recordings, respectively. (d) Mean open probabilities
(±sd) of the two channels from 6 and 9 independent recordings.
Exemplary closed dwell times at +120 mV for KcvNTS (e)
and KcvS (f). The data in e can be fitted with two exponentials
while the data in f require a third exponential. The long-lived closed
state in f is absent in e. The multiple kinetic variables of the two
channels including the probabilities (P) for occupying the open state
(O) and the closed states (C1–C3) (g) as well as mean lifetimes
(in ms) of the open state (τo) and of the three closed
states (τc1–τc3) (h) are
presented in two-dimensional radar plots. The probabilities of occupancy
and mean lifetimes were calculated from three independent 5 min recordings.
The symbols in d, g and h correspond to those in c.In spite of the sequence similarity, the two channels
differed
significantly in their open probability (Po) (Figure a,b,d).
While KcvNTS showed robust high Po values of 0.84 ± 0.08 over the entire voltage window,
KcvS exhibited a much lower open probability of only 0.35
± 0.04. Comparative analysis of the open and closed dwell times
showed that the two channels differed mainly in one distinct parameter
namely a long closed time τC3, which was absent in
KcvNTS (Figure e,g) but present and frequently occurred in KcvS (Figure f,g). The
two channels also exhibited a difference in the mean open dwell times,
which are at +120 mV 79 ± 19 ms and 15 ± 3 ms for KcvNTS and KcvS, respectively (Figure S1, Table S1). This difference is caused by variable
probabilities/rate constants with which the channel fluctuates between
the open state and the first, short closed state (C1). The associated
closing frequency has however only a marginal effect on Po. The mean lifetime τC1 of the first
closed state (1.3 ± 0.2 ms and 1.8 ± 0.8 ms at +120 mV for
KcvNTS and KcvS, respective) is so short that
it hardly affects Po (Figure g,h, Table S1). The low open probability of KcvS is therfore
primarily the result of the long lasting closed events (τC3) with a mean lifetime of 480 ± 145 ms at +120 mV (Figure h, Table S1).From these data we conclude that the high
sequence similarity and
the fact that the two channels differ in one defined closed state
make their comparative analysis an ideal system for studying the molecular
basis of a channel gate. Since the different AAs are distributed over
the two transmembrane domains (TMDs) (Figure b) we first tackled the location of the gate,
which is responsible for the long closed time. To this end, chimeras
were generated, in which we swapped the two TMDs (Figure a). Figure b shows that both chimeras produced channel
activity with the same unitary conductance (Figure c) but with distinct kinetics.
Figure 3
The KcvS long closed time is related to TMD2. (a) Chimeras
were constructed by swapping transmembrane domains between KcvNTS (in blue) and KcvS (orange), for illustration
purposes only. (b) Characteristic single channel fluctuations of chimeras
KcvS/NTS and KcvNTS/S at ±120 mV in planar
lipid bilayers. (c) Mean single channel i/V relations (±sd) of KcvNTS (open squares),
KcvS (filled squares), KcvS/NTS (blue circles, n = 9) and KcvNTS/S (orange circles, n = 3). (d) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels
and chimeras (n = 9 and n = 3 for
KcvS/NTS and KcvNTS/S, respectively). Exemplary
closed dwell times at +120 mV for KcvS/NTS (e) and KcvNTS/S (f). The data in e can be fitted with two exponentials
while the data in f require a third exponential. Radar plots for probabilities
(P) of the wt channels and the chimeras for occupying the open state
(O) and the closed states (C1–C3) (g) and of mean lifetimes
(in ms) of the open state (τo) and of the three closed
states (τc1–τc3) (h). The
probabilities of occupancy and mean lifetimes were calculated from
three independent 5 min recordings. The symbols in d, g and h correspond
to those in c.
The KcvS long closed time is related to TMD2. (a) Chimeras
were constructed by swapping transmembrane domains between KcvNTS (in blue) and KcvS (orange), for illustration
purposes only. (b) Characteristic single channel fluctuations of chimeras
KcvS/NTS and KcvNTS/S at ±120 mV in planar
lipid bilayers. (c) Mean single channel i/V relations (±sd) of KcvNTS (open squares),
KcvS (filled squares), KcvS/NTS (blue circles, n = 9) and KcvNTS/S (orange circles, n = 3). (d) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels
and chimeras (n = 9 and n = 3 for
KcvS/NTS and KcvNTS/S, respectively). Exemplary
closed dwell times at +120 mV for KcvS/NTS (e) and KcvNTS/S (f). The data in e can be fitted with two exponentials
while the data in f require a third exponential. Radar plots for probabilities
(P) of the wt channels and the chimeras for occupying the open state
(O) and the closed states (C1–C3) (g) and of mean lifetimes
(in ms) of the open state (τo) and of the three closed
states (τc1–τc3) (h). The
probabilities of occupancy and mean lifetimes were calculated from
three independent 5 min recordings. The symbols in d, g and h correspond
to those in c.It appears that the exchange
of the two TMDs led to a reverse gating
characteristics: KcvNTS/S now shows the long closed state
and low Po whereas KcvS/NTS acquires a high Po and only short closings
(Figure b–h, Table S1). From the results of these experiments
we conclude that the structural information, which is responsible
for the long closed time, is located in TMD2. Also TMD1 must have
some impact on channel gating, but this contribution is not relevant
for the long closed time.
Ser77 and Phe78 Are Crucial for Long-Lived
Closed State
There are only four AA differences between the
TMD2 of KcvNTS and KcvS. To identify the relevant
AA in TMD2 for gating
we mutated all 4 candidates in KcvNTS into the respective
residue of KcvS. A functional analysis of the mutants showed
that mutations T62V, L68M, and I75V in KcvNTS had no impact
on gating (Figure S2). Only the mutual
exchange of S and G at position 77 in KcvNTS and KcvS completely inverted the gating properties of the two channels:
the KcvSS77G mutant acquired the high open probability
of KcvNTS and the open probability of KcvNTS G77S decreased to that of KcvS (Figure a,b,d). The impact of the mutations on Po can be explained by the disappearance of the
long closed time in KcvSS77G and its appearance in KcvNTS G77S (Figure e–h, Table S1).
Figure 4
The difference of KcvNTS and KcvS in position
77 is responsible for the absence or presence of a long closed time.
Characteristic single channel fluctuations of mutant KcvS S77G (a) and KcvNTS G77S (b) at ±120 mV in planar
lipid bilayers. (c) Mean single channel i/V relations (±sd) of KcvNTS (open squares),
KcvS (filled squares), KcvNTS G77S (orange circles, n = 5) and KcvS S77G (blue circles, n = 3). (d) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels and
mutants (n = 5 and n = 3 for KcvNTS G77S and KcvS S77G, respectively). Exemplary
closed dwell times at +120 mV for KcvS S77G (e) and KcvNTS G77S (f). The data in e can be fitted with two exponentials
while the data in f again require a third exponential. Radar plots
for probabilities (P) of the wt channels and mutants for occupying
the open state (O) and the closed states (C1–C3) (g) and for
mean lifetimes (in ms) of the open state (τo) and
of the three closed states (τc1–τc3) (h). The probabilities of occupancy and mean lifetimes
were calculated from three independent 5 min recordings. The symbols
in d, g and h correspond to those in c.
The difference of KcvNTS and KcvS in position
77 is responsible for the absence or presence of a long closed time.
Characteristic single channel fluctuations of mutant KcvSS77G (a) and KcvNTS G77S (b) at ±120 mV in planar
lipid bilayers. (c) Mean single channel i/V relations (±sd) of KcvNTS (open squares),
KcvS (filled squares), KcvNTS G77S (orange circles, n = 5) and KcvSS77G (blue circles, n = 3). (d) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels and
mutants (n = 5 and n = 3 for KcvNTS G77S and KcvSS77G, respectively). Exemplary
closed dwell times at +120 mV for KcvSS77G (e) and KcvNTS G77S (f). The data in e can be fitted with two exponentials
while the data in f again require a third exponential. Radar plots
for probabilities (P) of the wt channels and mutants for occupying
the open state (O) and the closed states (C1–C3) (g) and for
mean lifetimes (in ms) of the open state (τo) and
of the three closed states (τc1–τc3) (h). The probabilities of occupancy and mean lifetimes
were calculated from three independent 5 min recordings. The symbols
in d, g and h correspond to those in c.We reasoned that due to their small size neither the AA Gly
nor
Ser at position 77 could be a gate, which could by itself obstruct
the flow of ions. Scrutiny of the channel sequences however revealed
that the next AA downstream of position 77 was the aromatic AA Phe
in both channels (F78). We predicted that the Phe aromatic side chain
was positioned in or out of the ion pathway, depending on the nature
of the adjacent AA. To test if F78 had any influence on the gating
of the two channels we mutated it to an Ala in KcvS. The
data show that removal of the aromatic side chain in the KcvS channel resulted in an increase in open probability and the disappearance
of the long closed state C3 (Figure a,d,e,g,h, Table S1). To
further test the hypothesis that F78 is a gate in combination with
the adjacent AA we constructed the double mutant KcvNTS G77S F78A. A functional test of this mutant showed that replacement
of the aromatic AA neutralized the effect of the G77S mutation (Figure b,d,f–h, Table S1), which alone caused a decrease in Po (Figure b,d,f–h, Table S1). The KcvNTS G77S F78A mutant had the same high open
probability as KcvNTS and the dwell time histogram showed
no long closed times (Figure d,f–h).
Figure 5
The aromatic AA F78 functions in combination with the
upstream
AA as a gate for the long closed time. Characteristic single channel
fluctuations of mutant KcvS F78A (a) and KcvNTS G77S F78A (b) at ±120 mV in planar lipid bilayers. (c) Mean
single channel i/V relations (±sd)
of KcvNTS (open squares), KcvS (filled squares),
KcvS F78A (orange circles, n = 4) and
KcvNTS G77S F78A (blue circles, n = 7).
(d) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels and mutants
(n = 4 and n = 7 for KcvS F78A and KcvNTS G77S F78A, respectively). Exemplary closed
dwell times at +120 mV for KcvS F78A (e) and KcvNTS G77S F78A (f). The data in e and f can now be fitted with two exponentials.
Radar plots for probabilities (P) of the wt channels and mutants for
occupying the open state (O) and the closed states (C1–C3)
(g) and for mean lifetimes (in ms) of the open state (τo) and of the three closed states (τc1–τc3) (h). The mean lifetimes were calculated from three independent
5 min recordings. The symbols in d, g and h correspond to those in
c.
The aromatic AA F78 functions in combination with the
upstream
AA as a gate for the long closed time. Characteristic single channel
fluctuations of mutant KcvSF78A (a) and KcvNTS G77S F78A (b) at ±120 mV in planar lipid bilayers. (c) Mean
single channel i/V relations (±sd)
of KcvNTS (open squares), KcvS (filled squares),
KcvSF78A (orange circles, n = 4) and
KcvNTS G77S F78A (blue circles, n = 7).
(d) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels and mutants
(n = 4 and n = 7 for KcvSF78A and KcvNTS G77S F78A, respectively). Exemplary closed
dwell times at +120 mV for KcvSF78A (e) and KcvNTS G77S F78A (f). The data in e and f can now be fitted with two exponentials.
Radar plots for probabilities (P) of the wt channels and mutants for
occupying the open state (O) and the closed states (C1–C3)
(g) and for mean lifetimes (in ms) of the open state (τo) and of the three closed states (τc1–τc3) (h). The mean lifetimes were calculated from three independent
5 min recordings. The symbols in d, g and h correspond to those in
c.To understand the nature of the
gate, i.e., whether the aromatic
rings form a barrier by π:π interactions or whether the
side chains are only steric hindrances we replaced F78 in KcvS with either Leu or Tyr. An analysis of mutant channel activity
showed that the substitution of F78 with Leu—a large, nonaromatic
and hydrophobic amino acid—caused a Po value, which was significantly lower than that in the F78A
mutant and even lower than in the KcvS wt channel. By analyzing
the single channel traces we detected the long lasting closed state,
which was eliminated in the F78A mutant. The lower Po of KcvSF78L compared to that of KcvS was the result of a higher probability of occupancy and a
longer mean lifetime of the third, long lasting closed state (Figure S4, Table S1). This closed state must
be caused by the concerted action of Leu with the upstream Ser because
a F78L substitution alone in KcvNTS had no effect on gating
(Table S1). F78 in KcvS was
also substituted with the polar aromatic Tyr. This caused a significant
increase in Po (Figure S4, Table S1). The results of these experiments establish that
F78 is a gate, which is responsible for the long closed events in
KcvS. It obstructs the flow of ions by creating a hydrophobic
barrier in the cavity of the channel. The dynamics of this gate are
apparently determined by the adjacent AAs Gly in KcvNTS and Ser in KcvS. It was previously proposed in other
channels that the flexible AA Gly could create a hinge in the inner
TMD of Kir channels and that this hinge might be essential for gating.[10,11] In analogy to this model it may be possible that a flexible G77
favors the removal of F78 from the ion pathway while the small Ser
does not. To test the relevance of a potential Gly hinge for gating
in KcvNTS and KcvS we mutated it into several
other small AAs namely Ala, Asn, Ser, Pro and Thr. However, the results
of these experiments do not support the hypothesis of a Gly hinge;
they show that G77 in KcvNTS can be replaced by other AAs
like Ala, which provide no flexibility in an α-helix, while
still preserving the high open probability (Figure a,b). The results of these experiments suggest
that Gly is not essential for the high open probability in KcvNTS but that Ser is important for the low open probability
in KcvS. To test this hypothesis we replaced S77 in KcvS by a number of alternative AAs and measured the function
of the mutant channels. The data in Figure a,b show that S77 can be replaced in KcvS by different AAs and that these changes result in an increase
in open probability. The only replacement of S77, which conserves
the low open probability of KcvS, is S77T (Figure a,b). In agreement, only G77S
and G77T in KcvNTS caused a low, KcvS-like open
probability. These experimental results refute the hypothesis that
a Gly mediated hinge plays a crucial role in gating. Instead the data
support a gating mechanism, which depends on the OH group of either
Ser or Thr.
Figure 6
The AA S77 is responsible for the gate with the long closed time.
(a) Characteristic single channel fluctuations at +120 mV of KcvS and KcvNTS and mutants in which the position 77
in both channels was exchanged with an AA with a different flavor.
(b) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels and mutants.
The number of independent measurements is shown in brackets. Data
in b correspond to the constructs on the left in a. Only AAs Ser and
Thr in position 77 generate a low open probability with a long lasting
closed time.
The AA S77 is responsible for the gate with the long closed time.
(a) Characteristic single channel fluctuations at +120 mV of KcvS and KcvNTS and mutants in which the position 77
in both channels was exchanged with an AA with a different flavor.
(b) Mean open probabilities (±sd) of wt channels and mutants.
The number of independent measurements is shown in brackets. Data
in b correspond to the constructs on the left in a. Only AAs Ser and
Thr in position 77 generate a low open probability with a long lasting
closed time.A scrutiny of the i/V relations
of all the mutants indicated that most AA exchanges have either no
or only minor effects on the unitary conductance of the channels (Figure c, 4c, 5c, S2–S4). In other cases, like in the KcvS mutants, in which
F78 was replaced by other AAs, the mutation lowered the apparent unitary
conductance of the channel (Figure a,c). Since there was no apparent correlation between
a mutation on gating and on conductance, we concluded that both processes
were independent. The orientation of the F78 side chain in the pathway
is apparently not effected by the current through the open channel
and vice versa.Since Ser has no apparent interactive partner
within TMD1 (Figure ) we conclude that
the relevant gating entities must be located solely within TMD2. This
is consistent with the fact that KcvATCV-1 also
has a high open probability[9] in spite of
some sequence variability with KcvNTS in TMD1 (Figure ). Potential interacting
partners of S77 in TMD2 could be the side chains of S76 or T79. If
one of these AAs were involved in the formation of a hydrogen bond
with S77, we would expect that substitution with Ala in KcvS would lead to a significant increase in Po and the disappearance of the long closed events. However, the functional
tests showed that both mutants, KcvSS76A and KcvST79A, still exhibited the typical gating of the wt channel (Figure S3). Therefore, S76 and T79 are not part
of the gating mechanism. What remains as an explanation for the gating
mechanism, in which S77 plays the crucial role, are interactions of
the S77 side chain with the peptide backbone. In this context, it
is interesting to note that Ser and Thr were found as important structural
AAs in α-helixes.[12,13] They can form H-bonds
with a carbonyl oxygen in the preceding helix turn and such an intrahelical
interaction can generate a kink in the α-helix. We reasoned
that such a transient Ser interaction in the TMD2 of KcvS could generate a kink in TMD2 in a stochastic manner and that this
structural modulation could affect the positioning of F78 in the ion
pathway. This hypothesis is consistent with the experimental data.
We found that S77 can be functionally replaced in KcvS by
Thr but not by Cys (Figure a). While Ser and Thr are able to form an intrahelical H-bond,
Cys cannot reach the required side chain conformation because of the
steric hindrance between the thiol group and the carbonyl oxygen of
the AA three positions upstream inside the α-helix.[14]
Molecular Dynamics Simulations Disclose Intrahelical
Hydrogen
Bond
To quantify the structural and dynamical implications
of differing sequences between KcvS and KcvNTS on the putative gate in the absence of experimental structural information,
we developed a computational model of the two variants. They were
examined by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to determine the angle
φ between normal vectors placed on the centers of the F78 phenyl
rings along with the respective distance d between
phenyl centers (see Figure S5). Distributions
of these coordinate pairs were averaged over neighboring and opposite
monomers for both channel variants, as shown in Figure a. KcvS shows a densely populated
area of opposite monomer residues with an angle less than 20°
and around 3–8 Å distance, and another area with less
population at around 50–60° and more than 18 Å distance.
The area with the smaller angle/distance pairs can be identified with
π-stack geometries. KcvNTS has similar areas of likely
monomer distances at 3–8 and about 20 Å, but with on average
larger angles between the phenyl residues. The angles of the area
at around 3−8 Å distance fall in the range between 20°
and 40°, implying much weaker π:π interactions. The
angle of the area around 20 Å is also much larger with angles
between 60° and 100°. Angle/distance pairs between phenyl
rings in neighboring monomers of KcvS occur with high probability
at 8–13 Å and 20°–40°, whereas in the
KcvNTS channel a substantially less focused area is found
covering a wider angle range. In summary, the results indicate more
pronounced structural rigidity for KcvS over KcvNTS, combined with a slightly larger propensity of the KcvS variant to form π-stack pairs between opposite monomers that
could potentially block the translocation pathway. This structural
and dynamical observation could be correlated with the functional
differences between both variants expressed by the larger open probability
of KcvNTS.
Figure 7
Dynamics
of TMD2 in KcvS/KcvNTS and mutants.
(a) Distribution of distance-angle pairs characterizing π-stack
geometries in KcvNTS (top row) and KcvS (bottom
row) averaged over all F78 pairs in opposite (left column) and neighboring
(right column) monomers. The geometric criteria are shown Figure S5. Numbers in the left panel denote different
monomers. (b) Analogous data for KcvS S77G and KcvNTS G77S mutants, demonstrating the transfer of π-stack
characteristics upon mutating the key residues. (c) Time series of
the distances between the carbonyl oxygen of I73 and the hydroxyl
hydrogen of S77 for all four monomers. (d) Schematic representation
of a hydrogen bond formed between the amide oxygen of I73 and the
hydroxyl hydrogen of S77 within monomer 3 of KcvS supplemented
by orientation of F78 (snapshot taken at 80 ns). (e) Snapshots of
F78 (red) in tetramer of KcvNTS (top) and KcvS (bottom) representing a wider and a narrow translocation pathway
corresponding to statistics shown in a.
MD simulations were also used to test
the hypothesis that the functional gate hinges upon possible hydrogen
bond interactions between S77 and the helix backbone at the I73 position
in KcvS (Figure d). We therefore calculated the distances between the S77
hydroxyl hydrogens and I73 backbone amide oxygens as a measure for
H-bonding patterns for all monomers, as depicted in Figure c. Two distinct states were
identified, one of which with a smaller distance at about 2 Å
corresponded to an H-bond. Remarkably, oppositely placed and neighboring
residues behaved differently, at least on the observed simulation
time scale. Monomers 1 and 3 (opposite) show predominantly the hydrogen
bond, whereas in the other pair of opposite monomers (2 and 4), it
occurs much less frequently. This inherent asymmetry is likely inherited
from the KirBac1.1 template structure that can be interpreted as a “dimer
of dimers” pairwise asymmetric state, which also explains the
1–3/2–4 difference found for the π-stack statistics.Dynamics
of TMD2 in KcvS/KcvNTS and mutants.
(a) Distribution of distance-angle pairs characterizing π-stack
geometries in KcvNTS (top row) and KcvS (bottom
row) averaged over all F78 pairs in opposite (left column) and neighboring
(right column) monomers. The geometric criteria are shown Figure S5. Numbers in the left panel denote different
monomers. (b) Analogous data for KcvSS77G and KcvNTS G77S mutants, demonstrating the transfer of π-stack
characteristics upon mutating the key residues. (c) Time series of
the distances between the carbonyl oxygen of I73 and the hydroxyl
hydrogen of S77 for all four monomers. (d) Schematic representation
of a hydrogen bond formed between the amideoxygen of I73 and the
hydroxyl hydrogen of S77 within monomer 3 of KcvS supplemented
by orientation of F78 (snapshot taken at 80 ns). (e) Snapshots of
F78 (red) in tetramer of KcvNTS (top) and KcvS (bottom) representing a wider and a narrow translocation pathway
corresponding to statistics shown in a.Deeper analysis of π-stack statistics for separate
monomer
units (Figure c) revealed
that monomers 2 and 4 (broken H-bonds) were more likely to form π-stack
geometries (not shown). In other words, the formation of hydrogen
bonds within a monomer is correlated with the phenyl ring motion by
bending them away from the translocation pathway, allowing oppositely
placed phenyl groups to interact more strongly, thereby blocking ion
translocation as a signature of a closed channel.In order to
test the hypothesis that our geometric π-stack
definitions represent valid descriptors that correlate with functional
states, we designed two computational control experiments. Following
the experimental strategy, we created KcvSS77G and KcvNTS G77S mutants based on the respective last frames of the
KcvS and KcvNTS runs. This inverts the experimental
behavior, and—as hoped for—we could also reproduce the
angle/distance distributions of KcvS by KcvNTS G77S and those of KcvNTS by KcvSS77G (see Figure b). Hence, we conclude
that our π-stack descriptor (angle/distance pairs) indeed correlates
with open/closed state propensities even in the absence of a functionally
open, conductive simulation system.
Absence or Presence of
Ser77 Alters Orientation of C-Terminal
Part of TMD2
The experimental and computational data agree
with the view that the gating differences between the two channels
are determined by the presence or absence of a kink in TMD2. The modeling
data further suggest that this could result in an altered orientation
of the TMD2 downstream of F78. In order to test the hypothesis that
a helix kink has an effect on the orientation of the last part of
TMD2 we experimentally created mutants in which the AA W82 in KcvNTS and KcvS was replaced with a Cys. We reasoned
that a different orientation of the TMD helixes in the mutant channels
should affect the propensity of forming sulfhydryl bridges between
the terminal Cys. The functional data of the mutant channels strongly
supports this hypothesis. The exemplary current traces of the KcvS W82C mutant show that this channel has a reduced unitary
conductance with different conductance levels (Figure a). The low unitary conductance was partially
rescued by adding DTT. This finding suggests that the terminal Cys
forms sulfhydryl bridges, which lowers the conductance at the cytosolic
exit of this mutant channel. The KcvNTS W82C mutant on
the other hand functions like the wt KcvNTS channel and
does not respond to DTT (Figure b). The terminal Cys must be oriented in the KcvNTS W82C mutant in such a way that it is unable to form sulfhydryl
bridges.
Figure 8
The two channels KcvS and KcvNTS have a different
orientation of the C-terminus. Characteristic single channel fluctuations
at +120 mV of KcvS W82C (a) and KcvNTS W82C
(b) in absence (−DTT) and presence of 5 mM DTT (+DTT) in bath
solution. The prevailing open (O) and closed (C) levels are indicated
along the traces.
The two channels KcvS and KcvNTS have a different
orientation of the C-terminus. Characteristic single channel fluctuations
at +120 mV of KcvS W82C (a) and KcvNTS W82C
(b) in absence (−DTT) and presence of 5 mM DTT (+DTT) in bath
solution. The prevailing open (O) and closed (C) levels are indicated
along the traces.
Conclusion
Ion
channels typically exhibit open and closed states with different
lifetimes in single channel recordings. It is generally believed that
each of these closed dwell times reflects the dynamics of a distinct
gate. In the present study we causally linked one long-lived closed
state in the KcvS channel to a simple electrostatic interaction
in the channel protein. The presence of a Ser (or Thr) in the inner
TMD of the KcvS channel promotes formation of an intrahelical
H-bond and a consequent kink in this helix. The kink, which according
to the data in Figure also generates a twist in the lower part of the helix, has by itself
no impact on gating. The channel only acquires a long-lived closed
state when the AA downstream of the critical Ser has an aromatic or
a long hydrophobic side chain. The computational data suggest the
following scenario: the formation of hydrogen bonds within a transmembrane
domain moves the phenyl ring of this domain out of the cavity giving
room for a movement of the adjacent phenyl groups toward the pore
center. These structural changes in the ns time window trigger a long-lived
conformation, which closes the ion pathway. Hence the closing of the
pore reflects a close interplay between all four monomers.A
similar gate, in which hydrophobic aromatic or aliphatic side
chains serve as an obstruction of ion flow, has previously been proposed
for other ion channels including complex K+ channels.[15] From the crystal structure of KirBac channels
it was deduced that the aromatic side chain of a Phe within the intracellular
half of the inner helix could project into the channel pore and close
it. Opening of the channels was presumably promoted by an upstream
Gly kink in the inner helix with a simultaneous retraction of the
aromatic ring from the ion pathway.[16−19] Since many Kir channels have
a hydrophobic aromatic Phe or aliphatic Leu at this position,[20] it was proposed that they may constitute a general
gate in the Kir family. In the case of Kir6.2 and Kir1.1 it was already
experimentally confirmed that the respective Phe and Leu are involved
in a pH sensitive gating of these channels.[20,21]The present data further underscore the relevance of Phe and
Leu
in gating. But different from Kir channels their function as a gate
is not connected to a flexible Gly hinge. Both the KcvS and the KcvNTS channels have a Phe in the same position
in the inner helix. This Phe serves as a gate only in combination
with an adjacent Ser. Placing a Gly in this position, which occurs
in many Kcv channels, does not affect gating. The Phe side chain only
becomes relevant as a gate in combination with an upstream AA like
Ser or Thr, which is able to form an intrahelical H-bond. In this
scenario Phe serves as the door and Ser as the hinge of the door in
the KcvS channel.The detailed analysis of single
channel data shows that the Ser/Phe
gate at the entry to the Kcvs channel functions autonomously.
The presence or absence of this gate has no appreciable impact on
the two remaining closed dwell times. This is different from other
studies in which channel gating was examined in the context of an
individual gate. In the case of the KcsA channel it was reported that
any modification of the filter gate or of the pH sensitive gate always
resulted in a complex modulation of several open and/or closed dwell
times.[2,3] In Kir6.2 channels, removal of the critical
Phe at the inner gate affects the stability of both open and closed
states.[20] This is consistent with the idea
that the dynamics of the Ser/Phe gate in KcvS is governed
only by a single conformational alteration. The filter gate or the
pH sensitive gate in KcsA in contrast may involve a network of electrostatic
interactions, which include more than one defined conformational state.While the MD simulation data provided a detailed insight into the
structural components of the gate they do not completely describe
the dynamics of the gating process due to the simulation time restriction.
MD provides structural/dynamical correlates with function, not the
complete microscopic picture. However, the MD simulations confirm
that the intrahelical H-bond promotes a positioning of the Phe in
the ionic pathway; this can generate π:π stacking interactions
between aromatic rings from different monomers. Computational mutation
tests confirmed the relevance of π:π stacking for understanding
the gating transition, in line with the experimental finding that
switching S and G at position 77 inverts the open/closed propensities
of KcvNTS and KcvS. The results of the simulations
suggest that the α-helix can dynamically fluctuate between a
straight and bended conformation, correlating with switching H-bond
patterns. A similar observation was reported from long MD simulations
in which the backbone structure of an α-helix in the pore domain
of a voltage gated Na+ channel undergoes dynamic deformation
in response to the making and breaking of intrahelical H-bonds.[22] All of these events occur in the time window
of ns (Figure c) or
μs[22] while the lifetime of the closed
state is in the range of hundreds of ms. Hence it is still not possible
to directly correlate the lifetime of the closed state with the lifetime
of an interaction or a conformational state of the channel protein.
We can only exclude the possibility that the respective long-lived
close state reflects the short lifetime of π:π stacking
between the aromatic rings of neighboring Phe; notably a similar long
close time is also observed when the Phe residues are replaced by
Leu.The importance of intrahelical H-bonds and their potential
role
in channel gating have not been reported previously. However, we predict
that similar mechanisms, which are relevant in the simple Kcv channels,
could be important in the gating of complex eukaryotic channels. Extensive
structural studies have shown that either Ser or Thr induce either
alone or in combination with Pro distinct distortions in transmembrane
domains of many proteins including ion channels.[23−25] Some isolated
data already suggest that such Ser or Thr mediated intrahelical H-bonds
have an effect on protein function.[24,26] Notably, pairs
of Ser or Thr together with aromatic or large hydrophobic AAs are
also frequently present in the inner TMDs of K+ channels.
The BK channel for example has a SFF338–340 motive at the cytosolic
end of the pore lining TMD in which Ser and both Phes are involved
in channel gating.[27,28]
Experimental
Section
Cloning, Mutagenesis, Protein Expression and Purification
The two viruses encoding the KcvNTS and KcvS channels were originally isolated from alkaline lakes in western
Nebraska. For cell-free protein expression the coding sequences of
KcvNTS and KcvS as well as their chimeras (KcvNTS/S, KcvS/NTS) were cloned into the pEXP5-CT/TOPO-vector
with the pEXP5-CT/TOPO TA Expression Kit (Invitrogen). To express
the channel proteins in their native form, a stop-codon was inserted
directly upstream of the coding sequence of a 6xHis-tag. The sequences
of KcvNTS/S and KcvS/NTS were generated by fusion-PCR.[29] All mutations were introduced by site-directed
mutagenesis using a protocol based on the method described in.[30] The coding regions of all constructs were sequenced.
In vitro expression of the channel proteins were performed with the
MembraneMax HN Protein Expression Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s
instructions. The in vitro expression takes place in the presence
of nanolipoproteins (NLPs)[31] fused with
multiple His-tags. This allows the purification of the native channel
proteins by metal chelate affinity chromatography. For purification
the crude reaction mixture was loaded on a 0.2 mL HisPurNi-NTA spin
column (Thermo Scientific). All steps were performed according to
the manufacturer’s instructions, with the exception of the
elution step. To elute the NLP/channel conjugates the spin column
was washed three times with two resin-bed volumes of 250 mM imidazole.
Planar Lipid Bilayer Experiments
All planar lipid bilayer
experiments were performed at room temperature (20–25 °C)
with a conventional bilayer setup (IonoVation, Osnabrück Germany).
The preparation of the recording chambers was done as described earlier.[32] Both chambers were connected with Ag/AgCl electrodes
to the head-stage of a patch-clamp amplifier (L/M-EPC-7, List-Medical,
Darmstadt). Membrane potentials were referred to the cis compartment. Current traces were filtered at 1 kHz with a 4-pole
Bessel filter and digitized with a sampling frequency of 5 kHz by
an A/D-converter (LIH 1600, HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany).
1,2-Diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC,
Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA) bilayers were formed by the
Pseudo painting/air bubble technique[33] in
symmetrical 100 mM KCl solution (pH 7, buffered with 10 mM HEPES).
For reconstitution of channel proteins a small amount (1–3
μL) of the purified NLP/channel-conjugates diluted in 250 mM
imidazole solution was added directly below the bilayer in the trans compartment with a bent Hamilton syringe. After successful
incorporation of a single channel in the DPhPC bilayer, constant voltages
were applied for 1 to 5 min. Voltage was changed in steps of 20 mV
between +160 mV and −160 mV.
Data Analysis
Single-channel current traces were recorded
with Patchmaster (HEKA) and analyzed with the custom-made program
Kielpatch (http://www.zbm.uni-kiel.de/aghansen/software.html). Single
channel amplitudes were measured visually. For determination of open
probabilities an automated Hinkley jump detector[34] was used. Dwell time histograms were fitted with sums of
1 to 3 exponential functions. The number of missed closed times, which
were not resolved because of a limited temporal resolution of the
recording setup, were estimated from the obtained fitting parameters.
The calculated numbers of missed closed-events were used to correct
the mean lifetimes of the open state. For this we assumed (i) that
the missed closed events are randomly distributed over the open events,
and (ii) that the missed closed events have a negligible effect on
the total time of the channel in the open state.For calculating
the probabilities of occupancy, we assumed a simple Markov model in
which all closed states were directly coupled to the open state with
no unobservable closed–closed transitions. If additional information
on the state transitions become available in the future, which require
a modification of this model topology, algorithms are available to
transform equivalent models into each other.[35]
Homology Modeling
The closed KirBac1.1 structure (PDB
code: 1P7B(16)) was chosen as a template for initial homology
modeling of the KcvS and KcvNTS geometries,
following closely the methodology for developing KcvPBCV-1[4] and KcvATCV-1[31] models. The template tetramer was constructed
from the KirBac1.1 monomer by applying the provided symmetry operations
using VMD 1.9.1.[36] Deletion of the cytosolic
domain resulted in a truncated KirBac1.1 tertiary structure sharing
the same total number of 82 residues. Sequence alignments using CLUSTAL
(version 2.1)[37] revealed large gaps, which
would lead to helix breaks. These were circumvented by restraining
residues 10–15 and 75–82 to an α-helical structure
during model preparation using Papwoth (version 9.10)[38,39] with default settings for optimization cycles.The energetically
most favored model out of ten was identified by its DOPE score and
further processed. Hydrogen atoms were added by CHARMM’s HBUILD
tool,[40] keeping all titratable residues
in their standard protonation state at neutral pH; C-terminal residues
remained deprotonated and the N-termini residues were protonated;
His residues were protonated at their δ-nitrogen. The resulting
models were minimized in the presence of two ions (selectivity filter
binding sites S2 and S4) and two water molecules (sites S1 and S3)
introduced at the filter positions by adapting the available information
from the KirBac1.1 structure. PROCHECK was utilized in its online
version (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/)[41] to assess the model quality, ignoring
hydrogen atoms.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Again
following the
methodology for simulating the KcvATCV-1 wild type
system[32] the KirBac1.1-based homology models
of KcvS and KcvNTS were inserted into a pre-equilibrated
DMPC bilayer membrane utilizing the CHARMM-GUI tools[42] by deletion of lipid molecules colliding with any protein
residues within a sharp radius of 0.5 Å of the protein, resulting
in a membrane comprising 192 lipid species in total with 90 molecules
in the upper and 102 in the lower layer induced by the conic protein
shape. 16726 water molecules (TIP3P model)[43] were added, removing water molecules inside the membrane. By random
exchange with 60 water molecules 31 Cl– and 29 K+ ions were introduced into the bulk solution creating a concentration
of approximately 100 mM KCl. With the two K+ ions already
located inside the selectivity filter electroneutrality of the entire
system was achieved. The initial system dimensions were ca. 90 Å
× 90 Å × 115 Å along x, y and z dimensions, with the latter representing
the channel axis. Periodic boundary conditions were employed by treating
electrostatics with the particle mesh Ewald algorithm[44] using a spacing of 0.1 Å between grid points and a
real-space short-range cutoff of 12 Å. The temperature was set
to 300 K for production runs, controlled by a Langevin thermostat
with a damping coefficient of 1 ps–1,[45] and a pressure of 1 atm was applied by a Langevin-piston
Nose-Hoover barostat.[46] The CHARMM22* force
field for proteins and CHARMM27 for lipids were applied throughout
the simulations[47,48] with ion parameters as used earlier.[4,32] NAMD (version 2.9) was used for performing simulations.[49] After minimization and equilibration with gradually
removing restraints over 12.7 ns, production runs were performed over
110 ns for each variant, sampled at each ps for further evaluation.
A snapshot of the KcvS structure is shown in Figure A. The quality of the MD simulations
is demonstrated in Supplementary Figure S6, where the root-mean-square displacements (RMSD) indicate long-time
stability. Point mutations to create KcvNTS G77S and KcvSS77G were introduced by the VMD[35] “Mutator” plugin on the last frame of the original
MD runs of the respective wildtypes and further simulated over 80
ns.
Authors: Anling Kuo; Jacqueline M Gulbis; Jennifer F Antcliff; Tahmina Rahman; Edward D Lowe; Jochen Zimmer; Jonathan Cuthbertson; Frances M Ashcroft; Takayuki Ezaki; Declan A Doyle Journal: Science Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ming Kang; Anna Moroni; Sabrina Gazzarrini; Dario DiFrancesco; Gerhard Thiel; Maria Severino; James L Van Etten Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Sabrina Gazzarrini; Ming Kang; James L Van Etten; Sascha Tayefeh; Stefan M Kast; Dario DiFrancesco; Gerhard Thiel; Anna Moroni Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-04-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Carter R Murry; Irina V Agarkova; Jayadri S Ghosh; Fiona C Fitzgerald; Roger M Carlson; Brigitte Hertel; Kerri Kukovetz; Oliver Rauh; Gerhard Thiel; James L Van Etten Journal: Viruses Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Denise Eckert; Tobias Schulze; Julian Stahl; Oliver Rauh; James L Van Etten; Brigitte Hertel; Indra Schroeder; Anna Moroni; Gerhard Thiel Journal: Channels (Austin) Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Laura-Marie Winterstein; Kerri Kukovetz; Ulf-Peter Hansen; Indra Schroeder; James L Van Etten; Anna Moroni; Gerhard Thiel; Oliver Rauh Journal: J Gen Physiol Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Oliver Rauh; Ulf-Peter Hansen; Sebastian Mach; Andreas J W Hartel; Kenneth L Shepard; Gerhard Thiel; Indra Schroeder Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2017-11-19 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Kerri Kukovetz; Brigitte Hertel; Christopher R Schvarcz; Andrea Saponaro; Mirja Manthey; Ulrike Burk; Timo Greiner; Grieg F Steward; James L Van Etten; Anna Moroni; Gerhard Thiel; Oliver Rauh Journal: Viruses Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 5.048