| Literature DB >> 28499033 |
Yu Heng Lau1,2, Finn Stirling1,2, James Kuo1,2, Michiel A P Karrenbelt1,3, Yujia A Chan1,2, Adam Riesselman4, Connor A Horton1,2, Elena Schäfer1,2, David Lips1,2, Matthew T Weinstock5, Daniel G Gibson5,6, Jeffrey C Way1,2, Pamela A Silver1,2.
Abstract
The ability to rewrite large stretches of genomic DNA enables the creation of new organisms with customized functions. However, few methods currently exist for accumulating such widespread genomic changes in a single organism. In this study, we demonstrate a rapid approach for rewriting bacterial genomes with modified synthetic DNA. We recode 200 kb of the Salmonella typhimurium LT2 genome through a process we term SIRCAS (stepwise integration of rolling circle amplified segments), towards constructing an attenuated and genetically isolated bacterial chassis. The SIRCAS process involves direct iterative recombineering of 10-25 kb synthetic DNA constructs which are assembled in yeast and amplified by rolling circle amplification. Using SIRCAS, we create a Salmonella with 1557 synonymous leucine codon replacements across 176 genes, the largest number of cumulative recoding changes in a single bacterial strain to date. We demonstrate reproducibility over sixteen two-day cycles of integration and parallelization for hierarchical construction of a synthetic genome by conjugation. The resulting recoded strain grows at a similar rate to the wild-type strain and does not exhibit any major growth defects. This work is the first instance of synthetic bacterial recoding beyond the Escherichia coli genome, and reveals that Salmonella is remarkably amenable to genome-scale modification.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28499033 PMCID: PMC5499800 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Accumulated recoding covering 200 kb of the S. typhimurium genome. An in silico design of the recoded genome replaced all 33 229 instances of TTA/TTG leucine codons with synonymous CTA/CTG codons respectively. From this design, regions A and B (yellow and purple) were independently recoded using SIRCAS, then combined into one strain by conjugative assembly. The ‘integrated recombineering element’ (inserted at the native hsd restriction system of S. typhimurium, blue) is an arabinose-inducible lambda red cassette that facilitates recoding by enhancing the homologous replacement of wild-type genomic DNA with synthetic fragments.
Figure 2.(A) Large 10–25 kb recoded DNA segments were created by assembling short synthetic DNA fragments into a YAC, followed by rolling circle amplification and linearization. Each recoded segment contains a selection marker (M1 or M2, typically kanamycin or chloramphenicol resistance cassettes) and flanking homology regions for integration. (B) Accumulated genome recoding by SIRCAS involves iterative recombination of recoded DNA segments. After each step, one selection marker is gained while the other is lost, providing a readout for successful recoding.
Figure 3.Screening for stepwise replacement of genomic segments. (A) Three possibilities after recombineering and selection for marker M1 are full integration of the entire segment leading to marker swapping, partial integration leading to the presence of both markers, or internal crossovers leading to missing recoding. (B) Hundreds of transformants were typically obtained on M1 selection plates (recoding of segment A13 shown here). On average, one in six colonies (16%) had the correct phenotype +M1/–M2, as identified by screening for no growth on M1+M2 plates. In this instance, 9 out of 60 colonies were correct (each marked with a red dot). (C) The rate of correct marker phenotype varied between different rounds of SIRCAS.
Figure 4.(A) Doubling times of various recoded S. typhimurium strains growing at 37°C in LB. Each data point is the average of three technical replicates, and the error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates. No major fitness defect was observed throughout the recoding process. The strain nomenclature ‘A_’ refers to the strain containing all recoded segments from A1 up to A_. We note that doubling times for B2, B3 and A13-B3 were calculated from growth curves conducted in batch cultures grown in flasks due to sedimentation, while the remaining data was obtained on a plate reader. (B) Uneven sedimentation of cells is observed when strains B2, B3 and A13-B3 are grown in a plate reader (wells in right column). (C) Growth data for B2, B3 and A13-B3 was obtained by growth in culture flasks rather than in 96-well plates to avoid sedimentation artifacts. Wild-type LT2 was used as a control and had comparable doubling times in both plate and flask growth (see Supplementary File SI 1 Figure S7.1.4).