Literature DB >> 28499016

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages: Radiological and Clinical Results from a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Won-Suh Choi1, Jin-Sung Kim1, Jung-Woo Hur1, Ji-Hoon Seong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), cage type and position play important roles in fusion achievement and sagittal alignment correction. However, no prospective randomized comparison of the results using different types of cage has been reported to date.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of unilateral MIS-TLIF using 2 types of cage.
METHODS: All candidates for single-level MIS-TLIF were randomized into banana-shaped cage and straight-cage groups. Plain radiographs and computed tomography scans were used for assessment of cage positions, fusion status, disc height, segmental lordotic angle, cage subsidence, and pelvic parameters. Clinical outcome was assessed using visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores.
RESULTS: Forty-four and 40 consecutive patients were operated on using banana-shaped and straight cages, respectively. Cage position was more anterior and lateral in the straight-cage group and more medial and posterior in the banana-shaped cage group. Solid fusion was achieved in 95.2% and 96.6% of the 2 groups, respectively, at 12 mo. The change in disc height and segmental lordotic angle postoperatively was significantly greater in the banana-shaped cage group. The incidence of subsidence during follow-up was significantly higher in the banana-shaped cage group (P < .04). Clinically, the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores decreased significantly after surgery in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary outcomes suggest that the subsidence rate may be higher using banana-shaped cages in MIS-TLIF, possibly due to their more medial final position.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28499016     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

1.  Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Lisa Ferrara; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Michael C Prabhu; Kevin C Jacob; Madhav R Patel; Hanna Pawlowski; Nisheka N Vanjani; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

3.  What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Soo-Heon Kim; Bang Sang Hahn; Jeong-Yoon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.052

4.  Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Boomerang-Shaped Cage with Traditional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yohei Ishihara; Masutaro Morishita; Jiro Miyaki; Koji Kanzaki; Tomoaki Toyone
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-07-25

5.  [Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between two approaches in treatment of single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Rui Zhong; Runsheng Wang; Jianheng Liu; Zhenchuan Han; Wei Jiang; Qingzu Liu; Keya Mao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

Review 6.  Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Y Chang; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.

Authors:  Sara Lener; Christoph Wipplinger; R Nick Hernandez; Ibrahim Hussain; Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Eliana Kim; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

8.  Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Versus Bilateral Interbody Cages.

Authors:  Conor P Lynch; Elliot D K Cha; Augustus J Rush Iii; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

9.  A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Ivo Abraham; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Albert E Telfeian; Morgan P Lorio; Stefan Hellinger; Martin Knight; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho; Max Rogério Freitas Ramos; Álvaro Dowling; Manuel Rodriguez Garcia; Fauziyya Muhammad; Namath Hussain; Vicky Yamamoto; Babak Kateb; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29

10.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants.

Authors:  Tjark Tassemeier; Marcel Haversath; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.