Literature DB >> 36203277

History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Michael C Prabhu1, Kevin C Jacob1, Madhav R Patel1, Hanna Pawlowski1, Nisheka N Vanjani1, Kern Singh1.   

Abstract

The minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a popular surgical technique for lumbar arthrodesis, widely considered to hold great efficacy while conferring an impressive safety profile through the minimization of soft tissue damage. This elegant approach to lumbar stabilization is the byproduct of several innovations throughout the past century. In 1934, Mixter and Barr's paper in the New England Journal of Medicine elucidated the role of disc herniation in spinal instability and radiculopathy, prompting surgeons to explore new approaches and instruments to access the disc space. In 1944, Briggs and Milligan published their novel technique, the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), involving continuous removal of vertebral bone chips and replacement of the disc with a round bone peg. The following decades witnessed several PLIF modifications, including the addition of long pedicle screws. In 1982, Harms and Rolinger sought to redefine the posterior corridor by approaching the disc space through the intervertebral foramen, establishing the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). In the 1990s, lumbar spine surgery experienced a paradigm shift, with surgeons placing increased emphasis on tissuesparing minimally invasive techniques. Spurred by this revolution, Foley and Lefkowitz published the novel MIS-TLIF technique in 2002. The MIS-TLIF has demonstrated comparable surgical outcomes to the TLIF, with an improved safety profile. Here, we present a view into the history of the posterior-approach treatment of the discogenic radiculopathy, culminating in the MIS-TLIF. Additionally, we evaluate the hallmark characteristics, technical variability, and reported outcomes of the modern MIS-TLIF and take a brief look at technologies that may define the future MIS-TLIF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar fusion; MIS-TLIF; Minimally invasive; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Year:  2022        PMID: 36203277      PMCID: PMC9537838          DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244122.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurospine        ISSN: 2586-6591


  84 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Langston T Holly; James D Schwender
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Laparoscopic lumbar discectomy: case report.

Authors:  T G Obenchain
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-06

3.  William Jason Mixter (1880-1958). Ushering in the "dynasty of the disc".

Authors:  R C Parisien; P A Ball
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  [Interbody fusion procedures. Development from a historical perspective].

Authors:  Marcus Rickert; Michael Rauschmann; C Fleege; E Behrbalk; J Harms
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Complications Following Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Including Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Hannah Weiss; Roxanna M Garcia; Ben Hopkins; Nathan Shlobin; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-07-13

Review 6.  Trailblazing: The historical development of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Authors:  Hugh A Fenton-White
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.

Authors:  Ian Teng; Julian Han; Kevin Phan; Ralph Mobbs
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Steven J Fineberg; Mathew Oglesby; Miguel A Pelton; Gunnar B Andersson; Darya Isayeva; Briana J Jegier; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Ali Alvi; Shyam J Kurian; Waseem Wahood; Anshit Goyal; Benjamin D Elder; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Anterior longitudinal ligament release from a posterior approach: an alternative to three-column osteotomy.

Authors:  Nathan Han; Nathan Pratt; M Farooq Usmani; Erik Hayman; Salazar Jones; Parker Johnsen; Alexandra E Thomson; Ivan Ye; Timothy Chryssikos; Ashish Sharma; Joshua Olexa; Daniel L Cavanaugh; Eugene Y Koh; Kendall Buraimoh; Steven Ludwig; Charles Sansur
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.