| Literature DB >> 28498315 |
Loida M García Cruz1,2, Gloria González Azpeitia3, Desiderio Reyes Súarez4, Alfredo Santana Rodríguez5, Juan Francisco Loro Ferrer6, Lluis Serra-Majem7,8.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify the major socio-demographic, health, and environmental determinants of stunting among children aged 0-59 months from the Tete province (Mozambique) and offering useful information for future healthcare strategies and interventions. A case-control study was conducted among 282 (162 boys; 120 girls) children under five years of age from the central region of Mozambique between 1 May and 3 June 2014. Children with stunting (HAZ < -2 SD according to the WHO Child Growth Standards in 2006) were considered as cases and those who had a Z-score < -2 SD were considered as controls. We collected data related to mothers and children and their environment, and they were assessed in two groups to find a possible association. The software used for data analysis was the SPSS®(version, 21.0) using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, chi-square analyses, bivariate comparisons, and stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. The results showed that birth weight, mother's educational status, maternal occupation, living in a rural area, family size, number of children under five years of age in the household, cooking with charcoal, inhabiting wooden or straw housing or housing without proper floors, overall duration of breastfeeding as well as duration of exclusive breastfeeding, and time of initiation of complementary feeding were significantly related to stunting. Thus, appropriate nutritional intervention programmes considering these determinants and the dissemination of knowledge at the population level related to undernutrition are necessary to ameliorate the children´s nutritional status.Entities:
Keywords: growth retardation; mozambique; nutritional assessment; stunting; undernutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28498315 PMCID: PMC5452221 DOI: 10.3390/nu9050491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Distribution of stunting status by characteristics of mothers and children and their environment (N = 282). Data is expressed in frequencies (%) or average ± SD (standar deviation).
| Chronically Malnourished | Normally Nourished | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 79 (77.5) | 83 (46.1) | 162 (57.4) | |
| Female | 23 (22.5) | 97 (53.9) | 120 (42.6) | |
| 43.3 ± 18.5 | 40.9 ± 18.2 | - | 0.31 | |
| Urban | 20 (19.6) | 175 (97.2) | 195 (69.1) | |
| Periurban | 20 (19.6) | 3 (1.7) | 23 (8.2) | |
| Rural | 62 (60.8) | 2 (1.1) | 64 (22.7) | |
| Respiratory infection | 17 (16.7) | 10 (5.6) | 27 (9.6) | |
| Gastrointestinal infection | 43 (42.2) | 90 (50.0) | 133 (47.2) | |
| Fever | 33 (32.4) | 78 (43.3) | 111 (39.4) | |
| Weight control and vaccination | 9 (8.8) | 2 (1.1) | 11 (3.9) | |
| 16 (15.7) | 157 (82.7) | 173 (61.3) | ||
| 56 (54.9) | 179 (99.4) | 235 (83.3) | ||
| <6 months | 75 (73.5) | 54 (30) | 129 (45.7) | |
| ≥6 months | 27 (26.5) | 126 (70) | 153 (54.3) | |
| Cereals d | 5.51 ± 2.42 | 7.76 ± 2 | - | |
| Fruit | 7.01 ± 3.02 | 7.92 ± 2.04 | - | |
| Vegetables | 7.5 ± 3.31 | 8.28 ± 2.1 | - | |
| Cow’s milk | 0.93 ± 4.22 | 1.04 ± 4.56 | - | 0.85 |
| Cow’s meat (beef) | 13.3 ± 6.74 | 11.48 ± 9.33 | - | 0.06 |
| Fish | 11.85 ± 5.04 | 13.93 ± 5.51 | - | |
| Chicken | 13.4 ± 5.75 | 15.32 ± 5.34 | - | |
| Eggs | 9.97 ± 5.37 | 10.39 ± 4.43 | - | 0.48 |
| Yoghurt | 0.9 ± 3.24 | 1.06 ± 2.76 | - | 0.66 |
| Legumes | 7.77 ± 4.06 | 8.18 ± 2.37 | - | 0.35 |
| Juices | 3.83 ± 5.51 | 6.99 ± 3.43 | - | |
| 78 (76.5) | 13 (7.2) | 91 (32.3) | ||
| Straw and wood | 45 (44.1) | 35 (19.4) | 80 (28.4) | |
| Clay bricks | 53 (52) | 79 (43.9) | 132 (46.8) | |
| Others | 4 (3.9) | 66 (36.7) | 70 (30.6) | |
| Soil | 98 (96.1) | 63 (35) | 161 (57.1) | |
| Concrete | 4 (3.9) | 117 (65) | 121 (42.9) | |
| - | 52 (28.9) | 52 (18.4) | ||
| Coal | 19 (18.6) | 128 (71.1) | 147 (52.1) | |
| Wood | 83 (81.4) | 30 (16.7) | 113 (40.1) | |
| Gas | - | 22 (12.2) | 22 (7.8) |
* p < 0.05 (Chi-square), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; a Those who have visited the healthcare centre at least once in the last year have been considered; b Completed vaccination schedule for the child’s age according to the Ministry of Health in Mozambique; c Children aged six months or over were considered; d Cereals consumed in form of ‘xhima’ or ‘papinha’.
Binary logistic regression (BLR) analysis and associations of sociodemographic variables with stunting.
| Binary Logistic Regression Analysis Univariate Model † | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Crude OR | 95% IC | ||
| Male | 79 (77.5) | 83 (46.1) | 4.01 | (2.32; 6.95) | |
| Female (ref.) | 23 (22.5) | 97 (53.9) | - | ||
| Urban | 40 (39.2) | 178 (98.9) | 137.95 | (32.38; 587.65) | |
| Rural (ref.) | 62 (60.8) | 2 (1.1) | - | - | |
| ≤2.50 kg | 36 (35.3) | 4 (2.2) | 23.86 | (8.18; 69.65) | |
| >2.50 kg (ref.) | 66 (64.7) | 175 (97.8) | - | - | |
| No education/primary | 102 (100) | 123 (68.3) | - | - | |
| ≥Secondary (ref.) | - | 57 (31.7) | - | - | |
| Housewife (ref.) | 76 (74.5) | 167 (92.8) | - | - | |
| Others | 26 (25.5) | 13 (7.2) | 0.23 | (0.11; 0.47) | 0.304 |
| Yes | 67 (65.7) | 17 (9.4) | 18.36 | (9.63; 35) | |
| No (ref.) | 35 (34.3) | 163 (90.6) | - | ||
| Yes | 78 (76.5) | 13 (7.2) | 41.75 | (20.19; 86.33) | |
| No (ref.) | 24 (23.5) | 167 (92.8) | - | - | |
| Straw and wood | 45 (44.1) | 35 (19.4) | 3.27 | (1.91; 5.60) | |
| 57 (55.9) | 145 (80.6) | ||||
| Soil | 98 (96.1) | 63 (35.0) | 45.5 | (15.99; 129.46) | |
| Concrete (ref.) | 4 (3.9) | 117 (65.0) | - | - | |
| Yes (ref.) | - | 52 (28.9) | 0.56 | (0.50; 0.625) | - |
| No | 102 (100) | 128 (71.1) | - | ||
| Coal (ref.) | 19 (18.6) | 150 (83.3) | - | - | |
| Wood | 83 (81.4) | 30 (16.7) | 0.05 | (0.024; 0.086) | |
*** p < 0.001; ref.: reference category; OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval; †—binary logistic regression analysis considering effect of one explanatory/predictor variable.
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for stunted children aged 0–59 months.
| Cases | Controls | Crude Odds Ratio OR | Adjusted Odds Ratio a aOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% CI | 95% CI | ||||
| Male | 79 (77.5) | 83 (46.1) | 4.01 (2.32; 6.95) | 4.57 (2.06; 10.12) | |
| Female (ref.) | 23 (22.5) | 97 (53.9) | - | - | |
| Urban | 40 (39.2) | 178 (98.9) | 137.95(32.38; 587.65) | 138 (32.38; 587.80) | |
| Rural (ref.) | 62 (60.8) | 2 (1.1) | - | - | |
| ≤2.50 kg | 36 (35.3) | 4 (2.2) | 23.86 (8.18; 69.65) | 19.99 (5.80; 68.85) | |
| >2.50 kg (ref.) | 66 (64.7) | 175 (97.8) | - | - | |
| No education/1 a | 102 (100) | 123 (68.3) | - | - | - |
| ≥Secondary (ref.) | - | 57 (31.7) | - | - | |
| Housewife (ref.) | 76 (74.5) | 167 (92.8) | - | - | |
| Others | 26 (25.5) | 13 (7.2) | 0.23 (0.11; 0.47) | 2.37 (0.46; 12.21) | 0.304 |
| Yes | 67 (65.7) | 17 (9.4) | 18.36 (9.63; 35) | 17.27 (7.62; 39.12) | |
| No (ref.) | 35 (34.3) | 163 (90.6) | - | ||
| Yes | 78 (76.5) | 13 (7.2) | 41.75 (20.19; 86.33) | 28.42 (11.93; 67.70) | |
| No (ref.) | 24 (23.5) | 167 (92.8) | - | - | |
| Straw and wood | 45 (44.1) | 35 (19.4) | 3.27 (1.91; 5.60) | 3.10 (1.53; 6.26) | |
| 57 (55.9) | 145 (80.6) | ||||
| Soil | 98 (96.1) | 63 (35.0) | 45.5 (15.99; 129.46) | 17.26 (5.87; 50.75) | |
| Concrete (ref.) | 4 (3.9) | 117 (65.0) | - | - | |
| Yes (ref.) | - | 52 (28.9) | 0.56 (0.50; 0.625) | - | |
| No | 102 (100) | 128 (71.1) | - | ||
| Coal (ref.) | 19 (18.6) | 150 (83.3) | - | - | |
| Wood | 83 (81.4) | 30 (16.7) | 0.05 (0.024; 0.086) | 0.055 (0.024; 0.124) |
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; CI—confidence interval; significance considered when p < 0.05 and if the OR and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) estimate did not cross the null for 95% CI. a OR adjusted for child‘s sex and area of origin.