Literature DB >> 26590803

Prevalence and determinants of stunting in under-five children in central Tanzania: remaining threats to achieving Millennium Development Goal 4.

Innocent Antony Semali1, Anna Tengia-Kessy2, Elia John Mmbaga3, Germana Leyna4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Millennium Development Goal No 4 (MDG 4) requires countries to scale up interventions addressing malnutrition and other immediate determinants of burden of disease among children to reduce child mortality by two thirds by 2015, which is this year. Whereas globally some achievements have been registered, under-nourishment remains a significant problem in some developing countries such as Tanzania. This study set out to estimate the extent of stunting and its associated determinants to assess the progress made thus far towards achieving MDG 4 in Tanzania.
METHODS: A random sample of 678 households with under-five children was selected from two randomly selected wards of Kongwa district in Dodoma region, Tanzania. The WHO anthropometric calculator, which computes Z-scores using a reference population, was used to process the anthropometric measurement data taken from all the participants. Children with height for age Z-score of less than 2 were categorised as stunted and coded as 1 and the rest were coded as 0. Proportions of stunting were compared using the chi-square test to determine the association between stunting and the independent variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) of the independent determinants of stunting. The cut-off for significant association was set at p = 0.05. All these analyses used the STATA 12 software.
RESULTS: About half (49.7 %) of the children were stunted. This stunting was associated with belonging to households where the head of family was young (<35 years) (AOR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.031), young age of the mothers (AOR = 1.54, 95 % CI 1.06-2.24, p = 0.023), and economic variables such as owning a cellular phone (AOR = 0.66, 96 % CI 0.46-0.94, p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Stunting was highly prevalent in Kongwa district despite general improvements in child nutritional status at the national level. Household characteristics and economic status were found to play a major role in child health. In this regard, disaggregated analyses are therefore important in identifying resilient areas in need of concerted efforts for the MDG 4 to be achieved nationwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590803      PMCID: PMC4654796          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2507-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


Background

Protein energy malnutrition (PEM) accounts for 1.4 % of the remaining global burden of disease estimated at 2.45 billion DALYs [1]. PEM measured anthropometrically is expressed as wasted, stunted or both. Stunting is a linear growth retardation resulting from long-term chronic under-nutrition manifesting as faltering growth [2]. Globally, it is estimated that stunting declined from 37.9 in 1990 to 26 % in 2010 and recently to 25 % [3]. Despite the aforementioned global gains, stunting in sub-Saharan Africa has plateaued at 40 % with some countries reporting even higher prevalence [4, 5]. Tanzania is ranked third among countries leading in stunting in Sub-Saharan Africa with a prevalence of 42 % [6]. Chronic malnutrition and the resultant stunting are associated with increased child morbidity and mortality, reduced physical capacity, reduced economic productivity and poor school performance [7, 8]. The ecology of stunting differs between and within countries, depending on underlying factors such as weather, policy, pricing of food, access to social services, farming practices and income level [9, 10]. Intermediate factors include household and social demographic characteristics such as household size and economic status. Immediate causes include the child’s age, gender, feeding practices, food preparation and overall health status [11, 12]. Understanding the role of these factors in causing stunting in children and hence heightened child morbidity is, therefore, important to alleviating this problem. The global response to the alleviation of poverty and its associated high burden of disease and under-nutrition culminated in the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) [13]. Among health-related MDGs, MDG 4 focuses on reducing child mortality by two thirds between 1990 and 2015. One of its indicators aims to cut in half cases of underweight among under-five children. In this regard, Tanzania was projected to reduce underweight cases by half (from 28.8 % to 14.4 %) and stunting by half (from 46.6 % to 23.3 %) among under-five children by 2015 [14]. In 2013, two years from the final timeline (2015) a United Nations report revealed that the proportion of undernourished children in developing regions had declined by 35.8 % from 1990 to 2012 [6]. On the other hand, developing countries such as Tanzania had only recorded a reduction of two percent in the same period [6]. As the target deadline approaches, determining reasons for this slow progress is essential in strategising and developing remedial measures. Such data will inform post-MDG 4 efforts towards addressing child malnutrition using stunting as a proxy indicator. The aim of this study, therefore, was to provide information on factors that influence stunting which are crucial to understand in the process of planning for achievement in the post-MDG era.

Methods

The study was approved by the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) Institutional Review Board (IRB). A cross-sectional study was then conducted in Kongwa district, one of the six districts in Dodoma region (province), located in central Tanzania. The district is divided into 22 administrative wards, each of which is further sub-divided into 3-5 villages. The population of the district is estimated at 300,000 people. The district is served by one public hospital, three health centres and eight dispensaries. Sample size calculation considered the national stunting prevalence rate of estimated at 42 % [15], power 90 % and 0.05 precision yielding 688 as the a sample size. We randomly selected two wards out of the 22 wards in the district. The first one, Mlali, had a population of 19,623 and the second, Ugogoni, had 17,048 people. A sampling frame consisted of households with an under-five child. Once compiled, the sampling frame was subjected to random selection of the required number of households from each village (with the sample size corrected for the sampling design). Equal numbers of households were selected from each ward. Within a household, both the mother and the head of the household were interviewed and anthropometric measurements for under-five children were taken.

Data collection tools

Field data were collected using a pretested structured interview guide that was administered by trained research assistants. The interview guide collected information on the socio-demographic characteristics, ownership of selected assets, distance to the health facility and time to the nearest water source. Permission was obtained from the mother prior to weighing the child using Salter scales. All the children were weighed wearing minimal clothing and without shoes. The weight was recorded to the nearest 100 grams and the height to the nearest 1 mm [16]. Each day and before any weighing, the scale was adjusted to zero for accuracy and consistency by using a 2 kg weight. A pair of trained research assistants assisted by the mother or guardian used a length measurement board with a sliding headpiece to measure the height of each child. For children under the age of two years as well as children who were unable to stand upright, their recumbent height was determined using a length board placed on a flat and firm surface. Such children were then placed lying supine along the middle of the board. Appropriate records were entered accordingly into the child’s checklist, which was checked for completeness and consistency at the end of the day.

Data management and analysis

The data were checked for completeness and consistency before being entered into the computer using EPI-INFO 3.2.3 database. Data cleaning was done and then followed by the generation of frequencies and descriptive statistics using STATA version 12 [17]. Independent variables included individual and community level variables. Individual variables included the age and education of the mother and the head of household, the number of children in the household and the marital status of the mother. Community (place) variables included distance to the nearest health facility and time to the nearest water source. The WHO Emergency Assessment Tool was used to calculate Z-scores using the anthropometric data of each child. Those with less than minus two (-2) Z-scores were classified as stunted and were coded as 1 and the rest were coded as 0. From the outset, comparison of percentages of stunted children by categories of the independent variables was done using the chi-square test to determine the significance of the difference observed. A multivariate logistic model that entered all 12 independent variables in one single step was adopted. The multivariate logistic regression determined the Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) for the association of the dependent and independent variables controlling for the rest of the variables. Significance level was set at p-value 0.05 or less. Prior to their participation, the aim and benefits of the study were explained clearly to the parents in addition to their right to voluntary participation. Respondents were also given an opportunity to ask questions for clarification purposes and when it was clear they had understood the nature of the study and their rights, each participant was requested to provide a written consent; only those who consented were recruited for participation in the study.

Results

The analysis involved 678 under-five children. More than half (55.6 %) of these children were from households headed by persons under 35 years; and close to a third of the households (32.2 %) were female-headed (Table 1). About a fifth (21.5 %) of the mothers were not married, and close to a third (31.1 %) of the heads of the household had not completed primary school education. The data further show that more than half (57.4 %) of the households surveyed had five or more persons. A large proportion (81.6 %) of the respondents were from households that had to walk five or more kilometres to the nearest health facility and three-quarters (75.1 %) of them walked for 15 minutes or more to a water source.
Table 1

Social demographic and economic characteristics of the study population

CharacteristicVariableN%
Age of the head of household (years)
<3537755.6
35+30144.4
Sex of the head of Household
Female21832.2
Male46067.8
Respondent marital status
Married52678.5
Un-married14421.5
Education of the head of Household (years)
7 years or more46768.9
Less than 7 years21131.1
Mothers education
7 years of more38957.4
Less than 7 years and more28942.6
Mothers age group
<2521732.0
25+46168.0
Number of children
<554279.9
5+13620.1
Number of people in household
<528943.6
5+38957.4
Distance to health facility
<512518.4
5+55381.6
Time to water sources (minutes)
<3016924.9
30+50975.1
Size of farm owned (acres)
<554981.0
5+12919.0
Own livestock
Yes33950.0
No33950.0
Social demographic and economic characteristics of the study population About half (49.7 %) of the children were stunted with variations dependent on their household characteristics. Stunting was higher (56.1 %) among children from households whose mothers had little formal education compared to those (44.9 %) whose mothers had completed class seven or higher (see Table 2). This difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 8.126, p = 0.004). Additionally, stunting was significantly less among children residing in households located less than five kilometres from a health facility (39.2 %) compared to their counterparts (52.1 %) residing further away (χ2 = 6.675, p = 0.009).
Table 2

Bivariate analysis of social demographic characteristics and stunting

CharacteristicAttributeNStunted (%)Chi-square p-value
Age of the head of the Household (years)
<3537746.7
35+30153.53.0990.078
Sex of the head of the household (years)
Female21846.8
Male46051.11.0920.296
Respondent married
Married52650
Un-married14449.30.02180.883
Education of the head of the Household
7 years or more46748.60.722
Less than 7 years21152.10.395
Mothers education
7 years of more38944.9
Less than 7 years and more28956.18.1260.004
Mothers age group
<2521754.4
25+46147.52.7880.095
Number of children
<554248.5
5+13654.41.5080.220
Number of people in household
<528948.8
5+38950.40.1690.681
Distance to health facility
<512539.2
5+55352.16.6750.009
Time to water sources
<3016943.2
30+50951.93.8160.051
Size of farm owned
<554951.0
5+12944.21.9410.164
Livestock
Yes33948.7
No33950.70.2890.591
Bivariate analysis of social demographic characteristics and stunting Multivariate logistic analysis as presented in Table 3 shows that independent factors were significantly associated with reduced odds of stunting. These factors included young age (less than 35 but older than 25) of the head of household (OR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47–0.96, p-value = 0.031), high mother’s education (OR = 0.71, 95 % CI 0.51-1, p-value = 0.05), and ownership of a mobile phone (OR = 0.66, 95 % CI 0.45–0.94, p-value = 0.023). However, a young age of less than 25 years of the mother increased the likelihood of stunting (OR = 1.54, 95 % CI 1.06–2.24, p-value = 0.023).
Table 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of stunting against selected characteristics

CharacteristicOdds Ratio95 % Conf. Int. p-value
Age of the head of the Household (years)<351
35+0.670.47–0.960.031
Sex of the head of the householdMale1
Female1.280.86–1.920.224
Mothers age25+1
<251.541.06–2.240.023
Mother is MarriedYes1
No0.930.59–1.460.743
Mothers education (years)<71
7+0.710.51–1.000.050
Education of the head of the Household (years)<71
7 +1.080.75–1.550.692
Number of children<51
5+0.810.52–1.240.334
Number of people in households<51
5+1.010.71–1.430.964
Owned a bikeNo1
Yes0.760.55–1.070.117
Owned a hand phoneNo1
Yes0.660.46–0.940.023
Owned livestockYes1
No1.010.71–1.430.964
Owned farmsYes1
No1.170.77–1.780.461
Distance to health facility5 +1
<50.770.49–1.180.232
Time to water source30+1
<300.690.48–1.010.058
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of stunting against selected characteristics

Discussion

About half (49.7 %) of the under-five children who took part in the study conducted in Kongwa district, central Tanzania, were stunted, thus presenting a significant public health problem. Factors significantly associated with reduced odds of stunting included if mothers education was more than seven years, age of the head of household being less than 35 years and ownership of a mobile phone. The prevalence of stunting observed was slightly higher than the estimated national average of 42 % [6]. This finding supports the observation that Tanzania is one of the leading countries in terms of stunting, ranked third after Ethiopia and the Republic of Congo [9]. Although some of the regions with very high proportions of stunting are paradoxically the same areas leading in food production in Tanzania, Kongwa district’s case was different. Kongwa district is one of the areas in central Tanzania that often receives low rainfall and consequently, poor harvests. In this study, children of young mothers (aged less than 25) were more likely to be stunted than those of older mothers. This is contrary to the findings in Ghana where stunting was associated with advanced maternal age (30–44 years) [2]. A possible explanation for such an association could be that younger mothers are more likely to have several young children and, therefore, have to stretch their food supply even farther. In addition, young mothers might have limited access to socio-economic resources to meet the nutritional needs of their children. The study also found that children whose mothers had modestly higher education levels were significantly less likely to be stunted than those of mothers with less or no formal education. In fact, an educated mother is more likely to have a better income base through better employment opportunity and efficient management of income generation activities than an uneducated or less educated one and thus is better able to meet the nutritional needs of her family. Likewise, an educated mother would have better skills and better information for planning purposes as well as for implementing strategies that can meet adequately the nutritional needs of her children and the whole family [9]. Related studies elsewhere similarly reported a strong relationship between maternal education levels and reduced likelihood of stunting [10, 11, 18]. Also mothers with better education will start giving birth at a relatively older age as they stay in school longer than less educated women. Consequently, they are likely to have acquired better childcare skills over time that is essential to meeting the nutritional needs of their children. Moreover, children from households where a member owned a cell phone were less likely to be stunted. Owning or operating a mobile phone is a proxy measure of economic status, implying a better ability to meet the needs of the family. Studies elsewhere also support the relationship between economic wellbeing and stunting [10, 11, 19]. In this regard, owning a mobile phone facilitates communication, and sustains social networks that could be contacted to provide support in case of food shortages. Such electronic gadgets also facilitate accessing information that can enhance the household’s capacity to mitigate food insecurity, thus prevent stunting. As this was a cross-sectional study, it was limited in its ability to determine a causal relationship between the observed factors and stunting. However, most of the factors observed have already been proven by other study designs with strong plausibility and consistency. On the other hand, reporting bias, which could have affected the findings in this study has been reduced by the use of well-trained primary school teachers in data collection. Since stunting is a physical measurement, it was not vulnerable to subjectivity, implying that the prevalence of stunting observed has good internal validity.

Conclusions

Therefore, we conclude that despite the national level improvement in child nutrition status, stunting was highly prevalent in Kongwa district and that household characteristics as well as the economic status of individual households do play a major role in child health promotion and stunting prevention. Disaggregated analyses are, therefore, important in identifying vulnerable areas in need of concerted efforts to engender the achievement of MDG 4 nationwide.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Stunting and future risk of obesity: principal physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Ana Lydia Sawaya; Susan Roberts
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 1.632

2.  Prevalence and trends of stunting among pre-school children, 1990-2020.

Authors:  Mercedes de Onis; Monika Blössner; Elaine Borghi
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Improvised measuring board, suitable for the field.

Authors:  E W Brink; D C Miller; J M Lane
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 0.731

4.  Child's gender and household food insecurity are associated with stunting among young Pakistani children residing in urban squatter settlements.

Authors:  Naila Baig-Ansari; Mohammad Hossain Rahbar; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta; Salma Halai Badruddin
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.069

Review 5.  Impact of micronutrient deficiencies on growth: the stunting syndrome.

Authors:  F Branca; M Ferrari
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.374

6.  Factors associated with the decline in stunting among children and adolescents in Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Vanessa Sá Leal; Pedro Israel Cabral de Lira; Risia Cristina Egito de Menezes; Juliana Souza Oliveira; Leopoldina Augusta de Souza Sequeira; Sônia Lúcia Lucena Sousa de Andrade; Malaquias Batista Filho
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Studies on the nutritional status of children aged 0-5 years in a drought-affected desert area of western Rajasthan, India.

Authors:  Madhu B Singh; Ranjana Fotedar; J Lakshminarayana; P K Anand
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Effect of mother's education on child's nutritional status in the slums of Nairobi.

Authors:  Benta A Abuya; James Ciera; Elizabeth Kimani-Murage
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Inequities in maternal and child health outcomes and interventions in Ghana.

Authors:  Eyob Zere; Joses M Kirigia; Sambe Duale; James Akazili
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos; Rafael Lozano; Mohsen Naghavi; Abraham D Flaxman; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Daphna Levinson; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Charles Mock; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Natasha Wiebe; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  20 in total

1.  Social determinants of inequalities in child undernutrition in Bangladesh: A decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Tanvir M Huda; Alison Hayes; Shams El Arifeen; Michael J Dibley
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The impact of training on self-reported performance in reproductive, maternal, and newborn health service delivery among healthcare workers in Tanzania: a baseline- and endline-survey.

Authors:  Tumbwene Mwansisya; Columba Mbekenga; Kahabi Isangula; Loveluck Mwasha; Stewart Mbelwa; Mary Lyimo; Lucy Kisaka; Victor Mathias; Eunice Pallangyo; Grace Edwards; Michaela Mantel; Sisawo Konteh; Thomas Rutachunzibwa; Secilia Mrema; Hussein Kidanto; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.355

3.  Risk Factors Of Stunting Among Children Under 5 Years Of Age In The Eastern And Western Provinces Of Rwanda: Analysis Of Rwanda Demographic And Health Survey 2014/2015.

Authors:  Samuel Habimana; Emmanuel Biracyaza
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2019-10-25

4.  Determinants of stunting among children aged 6-59 months at Kindo Didaye woreda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case control study.

Authors:  Bancha Batiro; Tsegaye Demissie; Yoseph Halala; Antehun Alemayehu Anjulo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Stunting, Wasting and Underweight in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Blessing J Akombi; Kingsley E Agho; John J Hall; Nidhi Wali; Andre M N Renzaho; Dafna Merom
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Factors Associated with Stunting among Children Aged 0 to 59 Months from the Central Region of Mozambique.

Authors:  Loida M García Cruz; Gloria González Azpeitia; Desiderio Reyes Súarez; Alfredo Santana Rodríguez; Juan Francisco Loro Ferrer; Lluis Serra-Majem
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Maternal stature, maternal education and child growth in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nazli Javid; Christy Pu
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2020-06-15

8.  Maternal characteristics and nutritional status among 6-59 months of children in Ethiopia: further analysis of demographic and health survey.

Authors:  Zufan Bitew Dessie; Melkitu Fentie; Zegeye Abebe; Tadesse Awoke Ayele; Kindie Fentahun Muchie
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  "A child may be tall but stunted." Meanings attached to childhood height in Tanzania.

Authors:  Zaina Mchome; Ajay Bailey; Shrinivas Darak; Hinke Haisma
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Stunting among Public Primary School Pupils in Kasulu District, Western Tanzania.

Authors:  Jairos N Hiliza; Leyna Germana; Amalberga Kasangala; Flora Joram
Journal:  East Afr Health Res J       Date:  2020-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.