OBJECTIVE: To assess equity in health outcomes and interventions for maternal and child health (MCH) services in Thailand. METHODS: Women of reproductive age in 40 000 nationally representative households responded to the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey in 2005-2006. We used a concentration index (CI) to assess distribution of nine MCH indicator groups across the household wealth index. For each indicator we also compared the richest and poorest quintiles or deciles, urban and rural domiciles, and mothers or caregivers with or without secondary school education. FINDINGS: CHILD UNDERWEIGHT (CI: -0.2192; P < 0.01) and stunting (CI: -0.1767; P < 0.01) were least equitably distributed, being disproportionately concentrated among the poor; these were followed by teenage pregnancy (CI: -0.1073; P < 0.01), and child pneumonia (CI: -0.0896; P < 0.05) and diarrhoea (CI: -0.0531; P < 0.1). Distribution of the MCH interventions was fairly equitable, but richer women were more likely to receive prenatal care and delivery by a skilled health worker or in a health facility. The most equitably distributed interventions were child immunization and family planning. All undesirable health outcomes were more prevalent among rural residents, although the urban-rural gap in MCH services was small. Where mothers or caregivers had no formal education, all outcome indicators were worse than in the group with the highest level of education. CONCLUSION: Equity of coverage in key MCH services is high throughout Thailand. Inequitable health outcomes are largely due to socioeconomic factors, especially differences in the educational level of mothers or caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: To assess equity in health outcomes and interventions for maternal and child health (MCH) services in Thailand. METHODS:Women of reproductive age in 40 000 nationally representative households responded to the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey in 2005-2006. We used a concentration index (CI) to assess distribution of nine MCH indicator groups across the household wealth index. For each indicator we also compared the richest and poorest quintiles or deciles, urban and rural domiciles, and mothers or caregivers with or without secondary school education. FINDINGS:CHILD UNDERWEIGHT (CI: -0.2192; P < 0.01) and stunting (CI: -0.1767; P < 0.01) were least equitably distributed, being disproportionately concentrated among the poor; these were followed by teenage pregnancy (CI: -0.1073; P < 0.01), and childpneumonia (CI: -0.0896; P < 0.05) and diarrhoea (CI: -0.0531; P < 0.1). Distribution of the MCH interventions was fairly equitable, but richer women were more likely to receive prenatal care and delivery by a skilled health worker or in a health facility. The most equitably distributed interventions were child immunization and family planning. All undesirable health outcomes were more prevalent among rural residents, although the urban-rural gap in MCH services was small. Where mothers or caregivers had no formal education, all outcome indicators were worse than in the group with the highest level of education. CONCLUSION: Equity of coverage in key MCH services is high throughout Thailand. Inequitable health outcomes are largely due to socioeconomic factors, especially differences in the educational level of mothers or caregivers.
Authors: Kenneth Hill; Patama Vapattanawong; Pramote Prasartkul; Yawarat Porapakkham; Stephen S Lim; Alan D Lopez Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jon Rohde; Simon Cousens; Mickey Chopra; Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Robert Black; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Joy E Lawn Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-09-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mats Målqvist; Ornella Lincetto; Nguyen Huy Du; Craig Burgess; Dinh Thi Phuong Hoa Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Bernadette P Marriott; Alan White; Louise Hadden; Jayne C Davies; John C Wallingford Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Henrik Axelson; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Björn Ekman; Thi Phuong Hoa Dinh; Tobias Alfvén Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 2.655