Dynamic covalent chemistry is exploited to drive morphological order-order transitions to achieve the controlled release of a model payload (e.g., silica nanoparticles) encapsulated within block copolymer vesicles. More specifically, poly(glycerol monomethacrylate)-poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) (PGMA-PHPMA) diblock copolymer vesicles were prepared via aqueous polymerization-induced self-assembly in either the presence or absence of silica nanoparticles. Addition of 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APBA) to such vesicles results in specific binding of this reagent to some of the pendent cis-diol groups on the hydrophilic PGMA chains to form phenylboronate ester bonds in mildly alkaline aqueous solution (pH ∼ 10). This leads to a subtle increase in the effective volume fraction of this stabilizer block, which in turn causes a reduction in the packing parameter and hence induces a vesicle-to-worm (or vesicle-to-sphere) morphological transition. The evolution in copolymer morphology (and the associated sol-gel transitions) was monitored using dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, oscillatory rheology, and small-angle X-ray scattering. In contrast to the literature, in situ release of encapsulated silica nanoparticles is achieved via vesicle dissociation at room temperature; moreover, the rate of release can be fine-tuned by varying the solution pH and/or the APBA concentration. Furthermore, this strategy also works (i) for relatively thick-walled vesicles that do not normally exhibit stimulus-responsive behavior and (ii) in the presence of added salt. This novel molecular recognition strategy to trigger morphological transitions via dynamic covalent chemistry offers considerable scope for the design of new stimulus-responsive copolymer vesicles (and hydrogels) for targeted delivery and controlled release of cargoes. In particular, the conditions used in this new approach are relevant to liquid laundry formulations, whereby enzymes require protection to prevent their deactivation by bleach.
Dynamic covalent chemistry is exploited to drive morphological order-order transitions to achieve the controlled release of a model payload (e.g., silica nanoparticles) encapsulated within block copolymer vesicles. More specifically, poly(glycerol monomethacrylate)-poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) (PGMA-PHPMA) diblock copolymer vesicles were prepared via aqueous polymerization-induced self-assembly in either the presence or absence of silica nanoparticles. Addition of 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APBA) to such vesicles results in specific binding of this reagent to some of the pendent cis-diol groups on the hydrophilic PGMA chains to form phenylboronate ester bonds in mildly alkaline aqueous solution (pH ∼ 10). This leads to a subtle increase in the effective volume fraction of this stabilizer block, which in turn causes a reduction in the packing parameter and hence induces a vesicle-to-worm (or vesicle-to-sphere) morphological transition. The evolution in copolymer morphology (and the associated sol-gel transitions) was monitored using dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, oscillatory rheology, and small-angle X-ray scattering. In contrast to the literature, in situ release of encapsulated silica nanoparticles is achieved via vesicle dissociation at room temperature; moreover, the rate of release can be fine-tuned by varying the solution pH and/or the APBA concentration. Furthermore, this strategy also works (i) for relatively thick-walled vesicles that do not normally exhibit stimulus-responsive behavior and (ii) in the presence of added salt. This novel molecular recognition strategy to trigger morphological transitions via dynamic covalent chemistry offers considerable scope for the design of new stimulus-responsive copolymer vesicles (and hydrogels) for targeted delivery and controlled release of cargoes. In particular, the conditions used in this new approach are relevant to liquid laundry formulations, whereby enzymes require protection to prevent their deactivation by bleach.
Stimulus-responsive
vesicles consisting of polymers, lipids, etc.
are excellent candidates for use as smart carriers and nanoreactors.[1−18] It is well-known that amphiphilic diblock copolymers with an appropriate
hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance can self-assemble into vesicles
(a.k.a. polymersomes) in aqueous solution.[19−24] Various types of functional diblock copolymers can be synthesized
with defined composition and controllable molecular weight using living
radical polymerization, which enables preparation of stimulus-responsive
copolymer vesicles for the encapsulation and controlled release of
active payloads.[25−40] In principle, disruption of vesicle membranes should be much more
efficient than membrane swelling for the release of larger cargoes
such as macromolecules or nanoparticles. In this context, there are
various literature examples of vesicle dissociation to afford molecularly
dissolved copolymer chains (a so-called order–disorder transition), whereby the membrane-forming hydrophobic block is rendered
hydrophilic in situ.[41−47] In contrast, vesicle-to-worm or vesicle-to-sphere order–order transitions have been recently reported, which can also be used
to trigger the on-demand release of encapsulated nanoparticle cargoes.[48−51] These latter transitions are typically the result of a subtle reduction
in the geometric packing parameter[52] arising
from the responsive behavior of either the stabilizer block or the
membrane-forming block toward an external stimulus such as temperature,[53−57] pH,[58−61] CO2,[62] cross-linker,[63] enzyme,[64] or redox.[65] In principle, vesicles that undergo morphological
transitions after selectively binding to specific analytes (either
by covalent bond formation or by host–guest supermolecular
interactions) present in the external solution offer new strategies
for targeted delivery and release applications.[49,50,66,67] In this context,
dynamic covalent chemistry, which can be both highly selective and
reversible, has been exploited by various research groups for the
design of stimulus-responsive polymers utilizing acylhydrazone bonds,[68] imine bonds,[69] Diels–Alder
chemistry,[70] Se–N bonds,[71] etc.[72−78] In particular, the reversible binding of phenylboronic acids with
cis-diols has recently become the subject of considerable attention,[79−83] not least because of various potential biomedical applications involving
detection of glucose, local pH, and adenosine triphosphate.[43,81,84−90] However, as far as we are aware, the use of such dynamic covalent
chemistry to induce order–order morphological transitions in
aqueous copolymer vesicles using water-soluble phenylboronic acid
derivatives has not yet been reported in the literature.In
the present study, we introduce a new concept: dynamic covalent
chemistry is utilized to drive order–order morphological transitions
in aqueous dispersions of diblock copolymer vesicles in order to release
nanoparticle payloads (and also to induce sol–gel transitions).
More specifically, we use polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA)[91−93] to prepare poly(glycerol monomethacrylate)–poly(2-hydroxypropyl
methacrylate) (PGMA–PHPMA) diblock copolymer vesicles in concentrated
aqueous solution.[94−97] This particular diblock copolymer was selected because (i) the PGMA
block contains pendent cis-diol groups that can bind selectively to
water-soluble phenylboronic acid derivatives[98] and (ii) the PHPMA block is only weakly hydrophobic, which facilitates
the desired order–order morphological transition. Moreover,
if such PGMA–PHPMA vesicles are prepared in the presence of
an ultrafine aqueous silica sol or a globular protein, then a significant
fraction of these nanoparticles can be encapsulated and thus serve
as a model cargo.[48] Mable and co-workers
recently reported that silica nanoparticle release can be achieved
by cooling such PGMA–PHPMA vesicles from 20 °C to around
0 °C because this induces a vesicle-to-sphere transition.[48] However, a thermal trigger operating at subambient
temperature is unlikely to be desirable for many commercial applications.
Furthermore, PGMA–PHPMA vesicles comprising relatively long
PHPMA blocks (i.e., thicker-walled vesicles) simply do not undergo
thermally induced morphological transitions.[59,60] Herein, we demonstrate that dynamic covalent chemistry can drive
morphological transitions for PGMA–PHPMA vesicles in the presence
of 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APBA) at ambient temperature and in
the presence of salt, even for vesicle-forming copolymer compositions
that do not normally exhibit thermoresponsive behavior. This
versatile molecular recognition approach enables excellent control
to be achieved over the rate of release of encapsulated nanoparticles
simply by varying the pH and/or APBA concentration.
Results and Discussion
A PGMA45 macromolecular chain transfer agent (macro-CTA;
the subscript refers to its mean degree of polymerization, DP) was
synthesized by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer
(RAFT) solution polymerization of glycerol monomethacrylate (GMA)
in ethanol using a 2-cyano-2-propyl dithiobenzoate (CPDB) chain transfer
agent (CTA) and 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) initiator
(see Figure a). This
water-soluble macro-CTA was then chain-extended via RAFT aqueous dispersion
polymerization of 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA) initiated by
4,4′-azobis(4-cyanopentanoic acid) (ACVA) to produce well-defined
PGMA45–PHPMA diblock
copolymer vesicles at 15% w/w solids. A mean DP of either 170 or 240
was targeted for the membrane-forming PHPMA block. The lower DP corresponds
to thermosensitive vesicles, whereas the higher DP
corresponds to thermostable vesicles.[59,60] Gel permeation chromatography (GPC; DMF eluent) analyses indicated
relatively narrow molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn ≤ 1.16) for the
PGMA45 macro-CTA precursor and both PGMA45–PHPMA diblock copolymers, as well as high blocking
efficiencies (see Figure b). Well-defined pure vesicular morphologies were confirmed
by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies (see Figure c).
Figure 1
(a) Synthesis
of PGMA45 macro-CTA via RAFT solution
polymerization of GMA and preparation of PGMA45–PHPMA diblock copolymer vesicles via RAFT aqueous
dispersion polymerization of HPMA. (b) DMF GPC curves recorded for
the PGMA45 macro-CTA (black curve) and the corresponding
PGMA45–PHPMA170 (red curve) and PGMA45–PHPMA240 (blue curve) diblock copolymers.
(c) Representative TEM images obtained for the PGMA45–PHPMA170 and PGMA45–PHPMA240 vesicles,
respectively.
(a) Synthesis
of PGMA45 macro-CTA via RAFT solution
polymerization of GMA and preparation of PGMA45–PHPMA diblock copolymer vesicles via RAFT aqueous
dispersion polymerization of HPMA. (b) DMF GPC curves recorded for
the PGMA45 macro-CTA (black curve) and the corresponding
PGMA45–PHPMA170 (red curve) and PGMA45–PHPMA240 (blue curve) diblock copolymers.
(c) Representative TEM images obtained for the PGMA45–PHPMA170 and PGMA45–PHPMA240 vesicles,
respectively.APBA was added to a 0.20%
w/w aqueous dispersion of PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles (molar concentration of GMA
[G] repeat units = 2.9 mM) at an initial pH of 10.5 (a slight reduction
in pH was observed after phenylboronate ester formation[99]). In the presence of 5.8 mM APBA, which corresponds
to a APBA/GMA (or [B]/[G]) molar ratio of 2.0, all of the original
vesicles were transformed into either worms or spheres after aging
for 15 h according to TEM studies (see Figure a). In contrast, the same vesicles undergo
no change in morphology when aged for the same time at pH 10.5 in
the absence of APBA (see Figure S2a in
the Supporting Information). The aqueous
vesicle dispersion was originally prepared at pH 5.8, so this control
experiment confirms that alkalinity alone is not sufficient to induce
an order-order transition. The observed changes in copolymer morphology
occur because the APBA selectively binds to the PGMA chains via formation
of phenylboronate ester bonds (see schematic cartoon in Figure a). This complexation increases
the effective volume fraction of this stabilizer block by both increasing
its effective mass and also introducing anionic charge,[100] which in turn reduces the geometric packing
parameter for the copolymer chains.[52]
Figure 2
(a) TEM
images obtained for an aqueous dispersion of 0.20% w/w
PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles before and after
APBA addition at pH 10.5 and the corresponding schematic cartoon depicting
the vesicle-to-worm (or vesicle-to-sphere) transition that occurs
after selective binding of APBA to the PGMA stabilizer chains. (b)
Evolution in the apparent sphere-equivalent DLS diameter for a 0.20%
w/w aqueous dispersion of PGMA45–PHPMA170 nano-objects recorded over time in the presence of 5.8 mM APBA at
an initial pH of 10.5 (red curve) and (c) corresponding TEM images
indicating the various changes in copolymer morphology observed during
this kinetic experiment. The blue curve shown in (b) is the control
experiment conducted in the absence of APBA at the same pH.
(a) TEM
images obtained for an aqueous dispersion of 0.20% w/w
PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles before and after
APBA addition at pH 10.5 and the corresponding schematic cartoon depicting
the vesicle-to-worm (or vesicle-to-sphere) transition that occurs
after selective binding of APBA to the PGMA stabilizer chains. (b)
Evolution in the apparent sphere-equivalent DLS diameter for a 0.20%
w/w aqueous dispersion of PGMA45–PHPMA170 nano-objects recorded over time in the presence of 5.8 mM APBA at
an initial pH of 10.5 (red curve) and (c) corresponding TEM images
indicating the various changes in copolymer morphology observed during
this kinetic experiment. The blue curve shown in (b) is the control
experiment conducted in the absence of APBA at the same pH.The gradual morphological evolution
that occurs in the presence
of APBA was monitored over 8 h using dynamic light scattering (DLS);
see Figure b. Initially,
the sphere-equivalent hydrodynamic particle diameter increased relative to the original vesicle diameter. This indicates the formation
of either jellyfish or branched worms, as observed by TEM (see Figure c). The subsequent
reduction in apparent particle diameter indicates the formation of
worms and/or spheres, which is also confirmed by TEM studies (see Figure c). The change in
copolymer morphology can be tuned by varying the APBA concentration
because this affects its extent of binding with the PGMA chains. For
example, using 2.9 mM APBA produced only branched worms after aging
for 15 h, whereas using 14.5 mM APBA yielded a mixture of mainly spheres
plus a few short worms from an initial 0.20% aqueous dispersion of
PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles under otherwise
identical conditions, as judged by TEM and DLS studies (see Figure S2).When a 10% w/w aqueous dispersion
of PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles ([G] = 145
mM) was examined, the addition of 7.25
mM APBA at pH 10.5 ([B]/[G] = 0.05) induced macroscopic gelation (see
insets shown in Figure S3a), which implies
a vesicle-to-worm transition.[101] Rheological
studies indicated an increase in the storage modulus (G′) up to a plateau value of approximately 76 Pa occurred within
70 min (see Figure S3a). In contrast, addition
of 14.5 mM APBA ([B]/[G] = 0.10) to the same vesicle dispersion led
to initial formation of a free-standing gel, but
subsequent degelation produced a free-flowing dispersion of relatively
low turbidity (see Figure S3b). These observations
suggest that an initial vesicle-to-worm transition is followed by
a worm-to-sphere transition. This interpretation is consistent with
the local maximum in G′ obtained in rheological
studies of the same vesicle dispersion after APBA addition (see Figure S3b).Small-angle X-ray scattering
(SAXS) was utilized for in situ studies
of the vesicle-to-worm-to-sphere transition (and concomitant sol–gel–sol
transition[102]) exhibited by a 10% w/w aqueous
dispersion of PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles
after addition of 14.5 mM APBA at pH 10.5 (see Figure ). The initial SAXS pattern exhibits an approximate
−2 gradient at low q, which confirms that
the original copolymer morphology corresponds to vesicles.[103] Morphological assignments were made at various
time intervals after APBA addition by monitoring the gradient of the
SAXS pattern in the low q regime (0.06 nm–1 < q < 0.10 nm–1). Soon
after APBA addition, this gradient became shallower, indicating the
onset of a change in morphology. Informed by the above TEM studies,
the original vesicles are most likely initially transformed into a
mixed phase comprising vesicles, jellyfish, and worms. Since anisotropic
worms exhibit a low q gradient of approximately −1,[103] the highest proportion of worms is obtained
after ∼10 min (see Figure inset, blue squares). This interpretation is consistent
with complementary time-dependent rheological studies performed on
the same 10% w/w aqueous vesicle dispersion (see Figure S3b), whereby the maximum G′
value (corresponding to a free-standing gel) was obtained 10 min after
APBA addition. The low q gradient continued to become
shallower after this time point until a limiting value of around −0.35
was observed after ∼25 min, which is indicative of weakly aggregated
spherical nano-objects. Monitoring the X-ray scattering intensity
at q = 0.019 nm–1 provides a crude
indication of the nano-object dimensions at any given time (see Figure inset, red circles).
This intensity is rapidly reduced from an initial value of ∼220
mm–1 to a limiting value of ∼5 mm–1 within ∼35 min, which suggests that the original vesicles
are converted into much smaller nano-objects. Such observations are
in good agreement with oscillatory rheology data, which confirm that
the intermediate gel is converted into a free-flowing fluid after
∼35 min. This macroscopic degelation suggests that the dispersion
consists mainly of spheres at this time point.
Figure 3
SAXS patterns recorded
for a 10% w/w aqueous dispersion of PGMA45–PHPMA170 nano-objects at pH 10.5 after
APBA addition. Representative lines with gradients of −2 and
zero are shown as a guide to the eye. Inset: Evolution in (i) the
gradient of the SAXS patterns in the low q regime
[0.06 nm–1 < q < 0.10 nm–1] (blue squares) and (ii) the X-ray scattering intensity
at q = 0.019 nm–1 [as indicated
by the vertical red arrow] (red circles) over time after APBA addition.
SAXS patterns recorded
for a 10% w/w aqueous dispersion of PGMA45–PHPMA170 nano-objects at pH 10.5 after
APBA addition. Representative lines with gradients of −2 and
zero are shown as a guide to the eye. Inset: Evolution in (i) the
gradient of the SAXS patterns in the low q regime
[0.06 nm–1 < q < 0.10 nm–1] (blue squares) and (ii) the X-ray scattering intensity
at q = 0.019 nm–1 [as indicated
by the vertical red arrow] (red circles) over time after APBA addition.APBA binding to the PGMA chains
was investigated using 11B NMR spectroscopy.[104] It is well-known
that (i) a pH-dependent equilibrium exists between phenylboronic acid
(and its derivatives, as in this study) and phenylboronate ion[105] and (ii) the latter species can bind with cis-diol
groups to form a phenylboronate ester (see Figure a). 11B NMR spectra (see Figure b) confirmed a high
degree of APBAionization when increasing the solution pH from 5.8
to 11.1. The original 11B NMR signal recorded at approximately
29 ppm for APBA at pH 5.8 (black spectrum) shifts to 3.3 ppm after
ionization at pH 11.1 (green spectrum). A new 11B signal
appears at 6.8 ppm in the presence of 7.25 mM PGMA45 ([B]/[G]
= 0.05), which indicates phenylboronate ester formation at pH 11.1
(red spectrum). On the basis of these 11B NMR studies,
we estimate that ∼38% of the APBA binds to the GMA residues,
which corresponds to approximately 0.8 APBA binding events per PGMA45 chain, as calculated using eq .where n is the number
of
APBA molecules bound per PGMA45 chain, f is the fraction of bound APBA (e.g., 38%), and DPG is
the mean DP of the PGMA chains (45). Increasing APBA to 14.5 mM leads
to a lower bound fraction f of 0.24 (blue spectrum),
which is attributed to the higher [B]/[G] molar ratio of 0.1. In this
case, there are around 1.1 phenylboronate ester bonds per PGMA45 chain. Approximately one phenylboronate ester (and hence
one anionic charge) per stabilizer block is clearly sufficient to
induce a vesicle-to-worm or vesicle-to-sphere transition (see Figures S3 and 3). It
is noteworthy that this is comparable to the end-group ionization/protonation
effect previously reported by Armes and co-workers.[59,60] More specifically, it was found that the ionization of a single
carboxylic acid group located at the end of the PGMA stabilizer chain
can confer pH-responsive character on PGMA43–PHPMA175 vesicles.[59] However, no morphological
transition could be induced in the presence of 100 mM KCl for such
vesicles. This is a significant disadvantage for potential commercial
applications because many industrial formulations (e.g., liquid laundry
products) contain salt. Thus, in the present study, we examined whether
PGMA45–PHPMA170 vesicles could exhibit
a morphological transition in the presence of both APBA and 100 mM
NaCl. A 0.20% w/w aqueous dispersion of vesicles was converted into
highly branched worms but only when using a [B]/[G] molar ratio of
2.0 (see Figure S4a). This suggests that
the added salt either suppresses APBA binding to the PGMA stabilizer
chains or partially screens the resulting anionic charge. Nevertheless,
increasing the APBA concentration ([B] = 14.5 mM) to target a [B]/[G]
molar ratio of 5.0 enabled both vesicle-to-worm and vesicle-to-sphere
transformations to be achieved, even in the presence of 100 mM salt
(see Figure S4b). In addition, such morphological
transitions can occur in the presence of buffer, as shown in Figure S4c.
Figure 4
(a) Reaction scheme for APBA binding to
PGMA in mildly alkaline
solution. (b) Corresponding 11B NMR spectra recorded for
aqueous solutions containing 30 mM APBA at either pH 5.8 (black spectrum)
or pH 11.1 (green spectrum) and binary mixtures of PGMA45 ([G] = 145 mM) and APBA at pH 11.1 (red and blue spectra).
(a) Reaction scheme for APBA binding to
PGMA in mildly alkaline
solution. (b) Corresponding 11B NMR spectra recorded for
aqueous solutions containing 30 mM APBA at either pH 5.8 (black spectrum)
or pH 11.1 (green spectrum) and binary mixtures of PGMA45 ([G] = 145 mM) and APBA at pH 11.1 (red and blue spectra).The effect of adding APBA to thicker-walled
vesicles prepared using
relatively long membrane-forming PHPMA blocks was also investigated.
In control experiments, no morphological transition was observed for
PGMA45–PHPMA240 vesicles after cooling
to 2 °C for 20 h at either pH 5.8 or 10.5 (see Figure S5a,b). In striking contrast, a vesicle-to-worm transition
could be induced for such PGMA45–PHPMA240 vesicles using our dynamic covalent chemistry strategy when selecting
a [B]/[G] molar ratio of 5.0 ([B] = 11.1 mM) at pH 10.5 (see Figure S5d), whereas no transition occurred when
[B] = 2.2 mM (see Figure S5c). Increasing
the [B]/[G] molar ratio enhances the extent of APBA binding to each
PGMA block. When the PHPMA DP (or x value) was increased
up to 300, no morphological transition was observed even at a [B]/[G]
molar ratio of 10 (see Figure S6). Greater
APBA binding to the PGMA stabilizer chains is required for the dissociation
of thicker-walled PGMA45–PHPMA vesicles because they lie further from the vesicle/worm boundary.
For [B]/[G] = 50 ([B] = 97.5 mM), branched worms were observed after
aging for 20 h, which then slowly transformed into a mixture of worms
and spheres after 96 h (see Figure S6).Unlike our earlier report utilizing a thermally triggered transition
for PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles at 0–5
°C,[48] APBA-induced vesicle dissociation
enables encapsulated silica nanoparticles to be released at ambient temperature. Moreover, the rate of nanoparticle
release can be fine-tuned by systematically varying the solution conditions.
In this series of experiments, the solution pH was adjusted using
ammonia rather than NaOH to avoid possible dissolution of the silica
nanoparticles. We also chose to use precisely the same PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles as those reported in ref (48) to facilitate a direct
comparison. First, these vesicles were prepared via PISA in the absence of silica nanoparticles and studied by TEM and DLS
to establish the conditions required for the vesicle-to-worm (or vesicle-to-sphere)
transition (see Figure S7). The morphological
transformation exhibited by PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles in the presence of APBA is subtly different from that observed
for PGMA45–PHPMA240 vesicles under the
same conditions. The longer PGMA stabilizer block means that the former
vesicles lie closer to the vesicle/worm boundary. Thus, unlike the
PGMA45–PHPMA240 vesicles, the PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles are thermoresponsive
and undergo dissociation on cooling to 0–5 °C,[48] even though they possess thicker vesicle membranes.
Furthermore, more APBA molecules can be bound to each (longer) PGMA
chain.For silica-loaded PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles,
the encapsulated silica nanoparticles were fully released after 12
h at 20 °C in the presence of 12.6 mM APBA ([B]/[G] = 5.0) at
an initial pH of 10.5 because these conditions led to the transformation
of the vesicles into either worms or spheres (see Figure a). DLS studies confirmed a
secondary population at around 20 nm (see Figure b). This feature is assigned to the released
silica nanoparticles because no such population was observed in the
control experiment conducted in the absence of any silica (see Figure S7b). It is only a minor population because
the copolymer nano-objects (apparent sphere-equivalent diameter =
75 nm) scatter light much more strongly than the relatively small
silica nanoparticles.
Figure 5
(a) Representative TEM images and (b) DLS particle size
distribution
curves demonstrating that dissociation of 0.20% w/w PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles loaded with 8.0% silica nanoparticles
at an initial pH of 10.5 in the presence of 12.6 mM APBA leads to
release of the encapsulated silica nanoparticles.
(a) Representative TEM images and (b) DLS particle size
distribution
curves demonstrating that dissociation of 0.20% w/w PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles loaded with 8.0% silica nanoparticles
at an initial pH of 10.5 in the presence of 12.6 mM APBA leads to
release of the encapsulated silica nanoparticles.The rate of vesicle dissociation, and hence the rate of release
of the silica nanoparticles, can be conveniently monitored by examining
the dispersion turbidity over time. The original vesicles form a highly
turbid dispersion, which becomes much less opaque as a result of the
vesicle-to-worm (or vesicle-to-sphere) transition; see the inset digital
photographs in Figure b. Thus, the absorbance of a 0.20% w/w aqueous dispersion of silica-loaded
PGMA58–PHPMA250 vesicles in the presence
of 12.6 mM APBA at pH 10.5 was monitored at a fixed wavelength of
450 nm over a 15 h period at ambient temperature (∼20 °C),
see Figure (black
curve). An approximately linear reduction in absorbance was observed
within the first 7 h, with a relatively constant final value of around
0.12 being observed after 12 h. According to the reaction equilibria
shown in Figure a,
phenylboronate anions are formed at higher pH and this species binds
strongly to the PGMA chains. In practice, this means that the release
rate of the silica nanoparticles can be readily controlled by varying
either the APBA concentration or the solution pH. Thus, doubling the
APBA concentration to 25.2 mM leads to a much more rapid reduction
in turbidity, which is almost complete within 2 h (see blue curve).
In contrast, essentially no change in turbidity was observed in the
absence of any APBA (see green curve). Lowering the solution pH by
one unit (from pH 10.5 to 9.5) significantly retards the rate of nanoparticle
release (compare the pink and black curves). Finally, increasing the
DP of the membrane-forming PHPMA block from 250 to 300 also leads
to a much slower morphological transition under otherwise identical
conditions (compare the red and black curves). Thus the vesicle membrane
thickness is also an important parameter in determining the rate of
silica nanoparticle release in the presence of APBA. Although the
vesicles reported herein are somewhat polydisperse in terms of their
overall diameter, they have relatively well-defined vesicle membranes.
Hence the rate of nanoparticle release is essentially independent
of vesicle size, although larger vesicles will, on average, contain
more silica nanoparticles than smaller vesicles.
Figure 6
Absorbance vs time curves
recorded at a fixed wavelength of 450
nm for a 0.20% w/w aqueous dispersion of silica-loaded PGMA58–PHPMA vesicles when subjected
to various release conditions (see labeled curves for details; x refers to the mean degree of polymerization of the weakly
hydrophobic membrane-forming PHPMA block).
Absorbance vs time curves
recorded at a fixed wavelength of 450
nm for a 0.20% w/w aqueous dispersion of silica-loaded PGMA58–PHPMA vesicles when subjected
to various release conditions (see labeled curves for details; x refers to the mean degree of polymerization of the weakly
hydrophobic membrane-forming PHPMA block).The encapsulation and release of silica nanoparticles from
vesicles
under the mildly alkaline conditions described herein is a useful
model system for understanding the encapsulation of enzymes in concentrated
liquid laundry products. In this case, it is essential to ensure that
bleaching agents (e.g., H2O2) do not cause premature
denaturation of enzymes such as protease, cellulose, lipase, or amylase
during long-term storage. In principle, enzyme encapsulation within
vesicles at 40 °C can prevent this bleach deactivation problem,[48] with subsequent APBA binding during the laundry
wash at pH 9–10 leading to in situ release of the enzymes.
If alternative applications are desired, the alkaline pH required
for APBA binding to the PGMA stabilizer chains can be lowered by selecting
phenylboronic acid derivatives with appropriate substituents. For
example, electron-withdrawing nitro groups can lower the effective
pKa to 7.1.[106] Similarly, intramolecular coordination between the electron-deficient
boron and an electron-rich ortho group, e.g., o-hydroxymethyl
phenylboronic acid (pKa ∼ 7.2),[107] enables binding to occur at physiological pH
rather than pH 9–10.
Conclusions
In summary, specific
binding of APBA to the pendent cis-diol groups
on PGMA stabilizer chains in mildly alkaline media can be used to
drive morphological transitions for PGMA–PHPMA diblock copolymer
vesicles. This dynamic covalent chemistry strategy can provide remarkably
good control over the rate of release of encapsulated silica nanoparticles.
Moreover, unlike earlier vesicle dissociation mechanisms based on
the thermoresponsive nature of the membrane-forming PHPMA block or
the ionization (or protonation) of functional groups located on the
stabilizer terminus, this approach works well at ambient temperature,
in the presence of relatively high levels of added salt, and even
for thick-walled vesicles that do not normally exhibit thermosensitivity.
In principle, this dynamic covalent chemistry strategy can be extended
to include other block copolymers and perhaps also other types of
vesicles such as liposomes. In summary, the combination of molecular
recognition with appropriately designed block copolymer vesicles appears
to offer considerable scope for targeted delivery and controlled release
applications.
Authors: Frank Versluis; Itsuro Tomatsu; Seda Kehr; Carlo Fregonese; Armand W J W Tepper; Marc C A Stuart; Bart Jan Ravoo; Roman I Koning; Alexander Kros Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jeehong Kim; Kangkyun Baek; Dinesh Shetty; Narayanan Selvapalam; Gyeongwon Yun; Nam Hoon Kim; Young Ho Ko; Kyeng Min Park; Ilha Hwang; Kimoon Kim Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Chin Ken Wong; Alistair J Laos; Alexander H Soeriyadi; Jörg Wiedenmann; Paul M G Curmi; J Justin Gooding; Christopher P Marquis; Martina H Stenzel; Pall Thordarson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Kaushik Chakraborty; Kandaswamy Vijayan; Andre E X Brown; Dennis E Discher; Sharon M Loverde Journal: Soft Matter Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.679
Authors: Renhua Deng; Yin Ning; Elizabeth R Jones; Victoria J Cunningham; Nicholas J W Penfold; Steven P Armes Journal: Polym Chem Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 5.582
Authors: Nicholas J Warren; Matthew J Derry; Oleksandr O Mykhaylyk; Joseph R Lovett; Liam P D Ratcliffe; Vincent Ladmiral; Adam Blanazs; Lee A Fielding; Steven P Armes Journal: Macromolecules Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 5.985
Authors: Yin Ning; Daniel J Whitaker; Charlotte J Mable; Matthew J Derry; Nicholas J W Penfold; Alexander N Kulak; David C Green; Fiona C Meldrum; Steven P Armes Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 9.825