| Literature DB >> 28496271 |
Janet Cooley1, Samuel F Stolpe2, Amber Montoya1, Angela Walsh3, Ana L Hincapie4, Vibhuti Arya5, Melissa L Nelson1, Terri Warholak1.
Abstract
Objective. Analyze quality improvement (QI) education across US pharmacy programs. Methods. This was a two stage cross-sectional study that inspected each accredited school website for published QI curriculum or related content, and e-mailed a questionnaire to each school asking about QI curriculum or content. T-test and chi square were used for analysis with an alpha a priori set at .05. Results. Sixty responses (47% response rate) revealed the least-covered QI topics: quality dashboards /sentinel systems (30%); six-sigma or other QI methodologies (45%); safety and quality measures (57%); Medicare Star measures and payment incentives (58%); and how to implement changes to improve quality (60%). More private institutions covered Adverse Drug Events than public institutions and required a dedicated QI class; however, required QI projects were more often reported by public institutions. Conclusion. Despite the need for pharmacists to understand QI, it is not covered well in school curricula.Keywords: medication error reduction; quality control; quality improvement; quality measurement; safety
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28496271 PMCID: PMC5423067 DOI: 10.5688/ajpe81351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Pharm Educ ISSN: 0002-9459 Impact factor: 2.047