| Literature DB >> 28494764 |
Ayumi Nakamura1, Chieko Itaki2, Ayako Saito3, Toko Yonezawa3, Koichi Aizawa4, Ayumi Hirai4, Hiroyuki Suganuma4, Tomisato Miura5, Yasushi Mariya6, Siamak Haghdoost7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate much of the DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation. Among carotenoids, lycopene and β-carotene, present in tomato juice, are known to be strong radical scavengers. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of tomato juice intake on the levels of DNA damage and oxidative stress in human whole blood induced by in vitro exposure to X-rays.Entities:
Keywords: Human lymphocytes; Lycopene; Radioprotective effect; Reactive oxygen species; Tomato juice; β-carotene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28494764 PMCID: PMC5427617 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-017-0248-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
The nutrition facts and carotenoid content in the tomato juice
| (A) | (B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrition factsa | Carotenoid contentb | ||
| Energy (kcal) | 38.0 | Lutein (mg) | 0.127 ± 0.0006 |
| Protein (g) | 1.6 | β-Cryptoxanthin (mg) | 0.042 ± 0.0035 |
| Fat (g) | 0.0 | α-Carotene (mg) | 0.074 ± 0.0003 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 7.2 | β-carotene (mg) | 0.255 ± 0.0009 |
| Dietary fiber (g) | 1.3 | Lycopene (mg) | 16.9 ± 0.2 |
| Sodium (mg) | 210.0 | ||
| Sodium chloride equivalent (g) | 0.5 | ||
| Calcium (mg) | 13.0 | ||
| Potassium (mg) | 530.0 | ||
| Sucrose (g) | 0.0 | ||
(A) The nutrition facts (B) Carotenoid content in the tomato juice used in this experiment (190 g)
aNutrition facts are according to the product label
bCarotenoid content is measured using HPLC (see Method section). Values are given as mean ± SE of three samples
The concentration of carotenoids in the human plasma
| Carotenoids (μg/mL) | Baseline | Intake | Washout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | |
| Lutein | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 |
| Zeaxanthin | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| β-Cryptoxanthin | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| α-Carotene | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| β-Carotene | 0.35 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.08 a, b | 0.32 ± 0.05 |
| Lycopene | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.03 a, b | 0.34 ± 0.03 |
Values are given as mean ± SE of 10 donors. a: different from baseline (P < 0.05), b: different from washout (P < 0.05) by paired t test
Fig. 1Radiation effects on the level of main carotenoids in human blood. a Concentration of lycopene according to radiation dose at each time point. Values are given as mean ± SE of 10 donors. b Structure ratio of lycopene (cis/trans) according to radiation dose. The ratio was constant between the different radiation doses. c Concentration of β-carotene according to radiation dose at each time point. Values are given as mean ± SE of 10 donors. a: different from baseline P < 0.05, b: different from washout P < 0.05 by Bonferroni/Dunn test. Concentrations of carotenoids after each period did not differ significantly by radiation (1a, 1c)
Fig. 2The level of oxidative stress-related markers in human blood. a Level of 8-oxo-dG in serum. b Level of d-ROMs in plasma. Values are given as mean ± SE of 10 donors. *P < 0.05, #: different between base line and intake period P = 0.059, $: different between base line and washout period P = 0.092 by (a) Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and (b) paired t test
Fig. 3Relationship between concentration of lycopene plus β-carotene and level of 8-oxo-dG in serum in the non-irradiated samples. The P value was determined by linear regression analysis
The level of 8-oxo-dG in human serum and cytogenetic damage in human lymphocytes in accordance with lycopene plus β-carotene concentration
| Dose (Gy) | Baseline | Intake | Washout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | |||
| 8-oxo-dG | (A) | 0 | 0.46 ± 0.23 | 0.32 ± 0.10 | 0.28 ± 0.10 |
| (ng/mL) | 0.1 | 0.66 ± 0.30 | 0.52 ± 0.21 | 0.74 ± 0.35 | |
| 0.5 | 0.58 ± 0.30 | 0.42 ± 0.20 | 0.48 ± 0.09 | ||
| 2 | 0.41 ± 0.19 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.49 ± 0.17 | ||
| (B) | 0 | 0.73 ± 0.22 | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.97 ± 0.46 | |
| 0.1 | 0.71 ± 0.21 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.29 | ||
| 0.5 | 0.45 ± 0.11 | 0.53 ± 0.12 b | 1.04 ± 0.21 | ||
| 2 | 0.63 ± 0.20 | 0.77 ± 0.30 | 0.69 ± 0.20 | ||
| MN | (A) | 0 | 22.10 ± 2.96 | 17.93 ± 4.45 | 24.07 ± 4.34 |
| (/1000 BNC) | 0.1 | 22.86 ± 1.93 | 20.54 ± 1.78 | 28.91 ± 3.59 | |
| 0.5 | 68.98 ± 8.04 | 54.88 ± 4.87 | 57.05 ± 8.38 | ||
| 2 | 281.6 ± 15.6 | 330.7 ± 26.7 | 337.9 ± 19.9 | ||
| (B) | 0 | 20.17 ± 2.97 | 14.30 ± 3.07 | 24.94 ± 5.63 | |
| 0.1 | 22.43 ± 6.45 | 20.84 ± 4.32 | 24.27 ± 3.79 | ||
| 0.5 | 57.84 ± 7.61 | 50.06 ± 4.06 | 53.01 ± 4.19 | ||
| 2 | 286.6 ± 12.2 | 300.2 ± 26.7 | 282.6 ± 17.8 | ||
| DIC | (A) | 0 | 0 | 0.18 ± 0.18 | 0 |
| (/500 metaphase) | 0.1 | 0.92 ± 0.49 | 0.38 ± 0.23 | 0.78 ± 0.20 | |
| 0.5 | 21.31 ± 1.33 | 19.93 ± 0.87 | 21.1 ± 1.71 | ||
| 2 | 98.72 ± 6.24 | 93.47 ± 4.32 | 105.4 ± 7.1 | ||
| (B) | 0 | 0.19 ± 0.19 | 0 | 0.19 ± 0.19 | |
| 0.1 | 0.32 ± 0.32 | 0.58 ± 0.39 | 0.40 ± 0.24 | ||
| 0.5 | 18.65 ± 1.86 | 14.99 ± 1.31 a,# | 20.86 ± 1.96 | ||
| 2 | 89.45 ± 6.13 | 85.64 ± 3.26 $ | 99.73 ± 5.60 | ||
(A) Group of individuals where the lycopene plus β-carotene concentration was higher than the median value at baseline (>0.635 μg/mL). N = 5 (1 male, 4 females) (B) Group of individuals where the lycopene plus β-carotene concentration was less than the median value at baseline (<0.635 μg/mL). N = 5 (4 males, 1 female) Values are given as mean ± SE of five donors. a: different from the baseline (P < 0.05), b: different from the washout period (P < 0.05), #: different from the washout (P = 0.056), $: different from the washout (P = 0.056) by Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (8-oxo-dG) and paired t test (MN and DIC)
Fig. 4Changes in the level of MN in human lymphocytes. Values are given as mean ± SE of 10 donors. *P < 0.05 by paired t test. a 0 Gy. b 0.1 Gy. c 0.5 Gy. d 2 Gy
Fig. 5Changes in the level of DIC in human lymphocytes. Values are given as mean ± SE of 10 donors. *P < 0.05 by paired t test. a 0 Gy. b 0.1 Gy. c 0.5 Gy. d 2 Gy