| Literature DB >> 28492507 |
Rui Hu1,2,3, Minxue Zheng4, Jinchang Wu5, Cheng Li6, Danqing Shen7, Dian Yang8,9, Li Li10, Mingfeng Ge11, Zhimin Chang12, Wenfei Dong13.
Abstract
The combination of radiotherapy (RT) and photothermal therapy (PTT) has been considered an attractive strategy in cervical cancer treatment. However, it remains a challenge to simultaneously enhance the radio-sensitivity of tumor tissue, develop tumor tissue-focused radiation therapies and combine dual therapeutic modalities. In this study, core-shell type magnetic gold (Fe₃O₄@Au) nanoparticles are exploited to achieve the synergistic efficacy of radio-photothermal therapy in cervical cancer. Fe₃O₄@Au nanoparticles (NPs) with uniform morphology exhibited superior surface plasmon resonance properties, excellent superparamagnetic properties, good biocompatibility and high photothermal conversion efficiency. For the in vitro tests, a low concentration of Fe₃O₄@Au NPs after a short period of near-infrared irradiation lead to the time-dependent death of cervical cancer cells. Further, the combination of RT and PTT induced synergistic anti-cancer effects in vitro. More importantly, an external magnetic field could significantly enhance the synergistic efficacy of Fe₃O₄@Au NPs by improving their internalization. Hence, the reported Fe₃O₄@Au NPs have the potential to be good nanoagents with excellent magnetic targeting ability for cervical cancer radio-photothermal treatment.Entities:
Keywords: cervical cancer; magnetic field; magnetic gold nanoparticles; radio-photothermal therapy; synergetic
Year: 2017 PMID: 28492507 PMCID: PMC5449992 DOI: 10.3390/nano7050111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Characterization of Fe3O4@Au nanoparticles (NPs). (a) TEM images (scale bar: 100 nm); (b) Dynamic light scattering analysis of Fe3O4@Au NPs; (c) Energy dispersive X-ray spectrum of Fe3O4 NPs; (d) Zeta potential of Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4@Au NPs; (e) Magnetization curve of Fe3O4@Au NPs at 300 K; (f) UV-visible-near infrared (NIR) extinction spectrum of Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4@Au NPs.
Figure 2Cell uptake and cytotoxicity of Fe3O4@Au NPs. (a) Intracellular localization of endo/lysosomes (red) and Fe3O4@Au NPs (green) using confocal laser scanning microscopy images, (scale bar: 10 μm); (b) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity of Fe3O4@Au NPs for 3 h with or without magnetic field; (c) Endocytic inhibition effect after treatment with various inhibitors. * p < 0.05 versus NP group.
Figure 3Cytotoxicity of Fe3O4@Au NPs to HeLa cells after 24 h (a) and 48 h (b). *, #, & p < 0.05 versus control group, & p < 0.05 versus non-magnetic treated-group.
Figure 4Photothermal conversion capacity of Fe3O4@Au NPs. (a) Temperature increase at different concentrations of Fe3O4@Au NPs after different irradiation times; (b) HeLa cell viability after incubation with Fe3O4@Au NPs for 0, 1, 3, and 5 min NIR irradiation. *, # p < 0.05 versus control group, & p < 0.05 versus non-magnetic group.
Figure 5Cell viability of HeLa cells after different treatments. *, # p < 0.05 versus control group, & p < 0.05 versus non-magnetic group.
Figure 6Live/Dead assay of HeLa cells after various treatment (scale bar: 50 mm).