Literature DB >> 17291243

Efficacy of different types of treatment in FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer in Korea: results of a multicenter retrospective Korean study (KGOG-1005).

H-S Ryu1, S B Kang, K-T Kim, K-H Chang, J W Kim, J-H Kim.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancers in Korea for the past 10 years, and evaluate the most frequently employed and appropriate management strategy, and also assess the survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This is a retrospective chart review of 727 FIGO stage IB2 patients from 1995 to 2005. Six hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled, and all dates on which the patients died were double checked through the "National Registry of Death Statistics" of the Korea National Statistical Office. Management strategies were divided into five groups according to the primary treatment modality. The most frequently employed primary treatment modality for stage IB2 cervical cancer in Korea during the past 10 years was radical hysterectomy (RH). The next was NAC, followed by radiotherapy (RT) and/or extrafascial hysterectomy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and/or extrafascial hysterectomy, in descending order. The surgery group showed the best results, with an 89% 5-year disease-free survival rate. However, there was no statistical difference between the surgery, NAC, and CCRT groups. For FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer during the past 10 years in Korea, RH and adjuvant RT or CCRT was the most frequently employed treatment strategy. As a primary modality, RH, NAC, and CCRT showed similar survival rates. However, RH demonstrated the best survival rate among the above treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291243     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00803.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  21 in total

1.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler; A Rauer; A Schneider; V Budach; A Tsunoda; M Mangler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Treatment patterns of FIGO Stage IB2 cervical cancer: a single-institution experience of radical hysterectomy with individualized postoperative therapy and definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Oliver Zivanovic; Kaled M Alektiar; Yukio Sonoda; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; William P Tew; John P Diaz; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with bulky squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Eriko Takatori; Tadahiro Shoji; Hideo Omi; Masahiro Kagabu; Fumiharu Miura; Satoshi Takeuchi; Seisuke Kumagai; Akira Yoshizaki; Akira Sato; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Georgios Angelopoulos; Jeremy Twigg; John B Murdoch; Jo Bailey; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

7.  Could the extent of lymphadenectomy be modified by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer? A large-scale retrospective study.

Authors:  Ting Hu; Xiong Li; Qinghua Zhang; Kecheng Huang; Yao Jia; Ru Yang; Fangxu Tang; Qiang Tian; Ding Ma; Shuang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An Alternative Triage Strategy Based on Preoperative MRI for Avoiding Trimodality Therapy in Stage IB Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jung-Yun Lee; Jina Youm; Jae Weon Kim; Kidong Kim; Hak Jae Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Min A Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  Comparison of outcomes between radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy versus primary chemoradiation therapy in IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Young-Seok Kim; Ha Jeong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Seung Jae Huh; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Impact of the care provided by gynecologic oncologists on outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Miao-Fang Wu; Jing Li; Huai-Wu Lu; Li-Juan Wang; Bing-Zhong Zhang; Zhong-Qiu Lin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.