Literature DB >> 28489252

Social effects for locomotion vary between environments in Drosophila melanogaster females.

Sarah A Signor1, Mohammad Abbasi2, Paul Marjoram1,3, Sergey V Nuzhdin1.   

Abstract

Despite strong purifying or directional selection, variation is ubiquitous in populations. One mechanism for the maintenance of variation is indirect genetic effects (IGEs), as the fitness of a given genotype will depend somewhat on the genes of its social partners. IGEs describe the effect of genes in social partners on the expression of the phenotype of a focal individual. Here, we ask what effect IGEs, and variation in IGEs between abiotic environments, has on locomotion in Drosophila. This trait is known to be subject to intralocus sexually antagonistic selection. We estimate the coefficient of interaction, Ψ, using six inbred lines of Drosophila. We found that Ψ varied between abiotic environments, and that it may vary across among male genotypes in an abiotic environment specific manner. We also found evidence that social effects of males alter the value of a sexually dimorphic trait in females, highlighting an interesting avenue for future research into sexual antagonism. We conclude that IGEs are an important component of social and sexual interactions and that they vary between individuals and abiotic environments in complex ways, with the potential to promote the maintenance of phenotypic variation.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; indirect genetic effects; locomotion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28489252     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Indirect Genetic Effects: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Amelie Baud; Sarah McPeek; Nancy Chen; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.679

2.  Dynamic changes in gene expression and alternative splicing mediate the response to acute alcohol exposure in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sarah Signor; Sergey Nuzhdin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour in D. simulans.

Authors:  Allison Jaffe; Madeline P Burns; Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Conservation of social effects (Ψ) between two species of Drosophila despite reversal of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Sarah A Signor; Mohammad Abbasi; Paul Marjoram; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The Indirect Genetic Effect Interaction Coefficient ψ: Theoretically Essential and Empirically Neglected.

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Camille Desjonquères
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Analysis of direct and indirect genetic effects in fighting sea anemones.

Authors:  Sarah M Lane; Alastair J Wilson; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  An evolutionary switch from sibling rivalry to sibling cooperation, caused by a sustained loss of parental care.

Authors:  Darren Rebar; Nathan W Bailey; Benjamin J M Jarrett; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.