Literature DB >> 28488253

Increase in Total Joint Arthroplasty Projected from 2014 to 2046 in Australia: A Conservative Local Model With International Implications.

Maria C S Inacio1, Stephen E Graves2, Nicole L Pratt3, Elizabeth E Roughead3, Szilard Nemes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of joint arthroplasty is increasing worldwide. International estimates of future demand for joint arthroplasty have used models that propose either an exponential future increase, despite obvious system constraints, or static increases, which do not account for past trends. Country-specific projection estimates that address limitations of past projections are necessary. In Australia, a high-income country with the 7th highest incidence of TKA and 15th highest incidence of THA of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, the volume of TKAs and THAs increased 198% between 1994 and 2014. QUESTIONS/
PURPOSE: To determine the projected incidence and volume of primary TKAs and THAs from 2014 to 2046 in the Australian population older than 40 years.
METHODS: Australian State and Territory Health Department data were used to identify TKAs and THAs performed between 1994 and 1995 and 2013 and 2014. The Australian Bureau of Statistics was the source of the population estimates for the same periods and population-projected estimates until 2046. The incidence rate (IR), 95% CI, and prediction interval (PI) of TKAs and THAs per 100,000 Australian citizens older than 40 years were calculated. Future IRs were estimated using a logistic model, and volume was calculated from projected IR and population. The logistic growth model assumes the existence of an upper limit of the TKA and THA incidences and a growth rate directly related to this incidence. At the beginning, when the observed incidence is much lower than the asymptote, the increase is exponential, but it decreases as it approaches the upper limit.
RESULTS: A 66% increase in the IR of primary THAs between 2013 and 2046 is projected for Australia (2013: IR = 307 per 100,000, [95% CI, 262-329 per 100,000] compared with 2046: IR= 510 per 100,000, [95% PI, 98-567 per 100,000]), which translates to a 219% increase in the volume during this period. For TKAs the IR is expected to increase by 26% by 2046 (IR = 575 per 100,000; 95% PI, 402-717 per 100,000) compared with 2013 (IR = 437 per 100,000; 95% CI, 397-479 per 100,000) and the volume to increase by 142%.
CONCLUSION: A large increase in the volume of arthroplasties is expected using a conservative projection model that accounts for past surgical trends and future population changes in Australia. These findings have international implications, as they show that using country- specific, conservative projection approaches, a substantial increase in the number of these procedures is expected. This increase in joint arthroplasty volume will require appropriate workforce planning, resource allocation, and budget planning so that demand can be met. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic and decision analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28488253      PMCID: PMC5498389          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5377-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Changing incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  V M Wells; T C Hearn; K A McCaul; S M Anderton; A E R Wigg; S E Graves
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17,080 replacements from 1995 through 2004.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Maria Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Stefano A Bini; Robert S Namba; Raoul J Burchette; Donald C Fithian
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Marcel Widmer; Milka Maravic; Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Maria de Fátima de Pina; Valerio Manno; Marina Torre; William L Walter; Richard de Steiger; Rudolph G T Geesink; Mikko Peltola; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Slowing demand for total joint arthroplasty in a population of 3.2 million.

Authors:  Stefano A Bini; Stephen Sidney; Michael Sorel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Projected progression of the prevalence of obesity in Australia.

Authors:  Helen L Walls; Dianna J Magliano; Christopher E Stevenson; Kathryn Backholer; Haider R Mannan; Jonathan E Shaw; Anna Peeters
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Utilization rates of knee-arthroplasty in OECD countries.

Authors:  C Pabinger; H Lothaller; A Geissler
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  The incidence of knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis grows rapidly among baby boomers: a population-based study in Finland.

Authors:  Jarkko Leskinen; Antti Eskelinen; Heini Huhtala; Pekka Paavolainen; Ville Remes
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-02

9.  Current trends and projections in the utilisation rates of hip and knee replacement in New Zealand from 2001 to 2026.

Authors:  Gary Hooper; Alex J-J Lee; Alastair Rothwell; Chris Frampton
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2014-08-29

10.  Historical view and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden.

Authors:  Szilárd Nemes; Ola Rolfson; Annette W-Dahl; Göran Garellick; Martin Sundberg; Johan Kärrholm; Otto Robertsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  33 in total

1.  Total knee arthroplasty in Italy: reflections from the last fifteen years and projections for the next thirty.

Authors:  Emilio Romanini; Francesco Decarolis; Ilaria Luzi; Gustavo Zanoli; Michele Venosa; Paola Laricchiuta; Eugenio Carrani; Marina Torre
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The gut microbiota may be a novel pathogenic mechanism in loosening of orthopedic implants in rats.

Authors:  Meghan M Moran; Brittany M Wilson; Jun Li; Phillip A Engen; Ankur Naqib; Stefan J Green; Amarjit S Virdi; Anna Plaas; Christopher B Forsyth; Ali Keshavarzian; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The learning curve following adoption of a novel short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implications on short-term patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jorge A Padilla; Afshin A Anoushiravani; James E Feng; Ran Schwarzkopf; James Slover; Scott Marwin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06

5.  Mobile rehabilitation support versus usual care in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Qingling Wang; Sharyn Hunter; Regina Lai-Tong Lee; Xiaofeng Wang; Sally Wai-Chi Chan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years.

Authors:  Manuel Weißenberger; Alexander Klug; Yves Gramlich; Maximilian Rudert; Philipp Drees; Reinhard Hoffmann; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  What Are Risk Factors for Infection after Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Hiba K Anis; Rushabh M Vakharia; Alexander J Acuña; Peter A Gold; Luke J Garbarino; Bilal M Mahmood; Nicholas R Arnold; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Eric L Grossman; Michael A Mont; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Migliorini; A Trivellas; J Eschweiler; A Driessen; F Lessi; M Tingart; P Aretini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 10.  Pelvic discontinuity: a challenge to overcome.

Authors:  George C Babis; Vasileios S Nikolaou
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.