Literature DB >> 28487201

On defining resurgence.

Kennon A Lattal1, Carlos R X Cançado2, James E Cook2, Stephanie L Kincaid2, Tyler D Nighbor2, Anthony C Oliver2.   

Abstract

A review of different investigators' definitions of resurgence revealed several common features: First, characteristics of the resurgent, or target, response, such as its transience; magnitude; time course within and across sessions; and relativity to a baseline response rate are not mentioned. Second, the target response is described as being established through its reinforcement in the first, or Training, phase of a resurgence procedure. Third, the target response must be eliminated as an alternative response is reinforced in the second, Alternative Reinforcement, phase of a resurgence procedure. Fourth, the alternative response must be extinguished during the Resurgence Test phase. Fifth, none of the definitions allude to any contribution of stimulus variables to resurgence. When reconsidered in light of contemporary research germane to these features, none of the reviewed definitions sufficiently reflect important variables in the generation and assessment of resurgence. The review concludes with a proposed working definition that takes into account contemporary research involving all of the aforementioned factors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Condition worsening; Definition; Extinction; Operant behavior; Recurrent behavior; Reinforcement history; Resurgence; Stimulus variables

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28487201     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  14 in total

1.  A preliminary evaluation of treatment duration on the resurgence of destructive behavior.

Authors:  Brian D Greer; Wayne W Fisher; Billie J Retzlaff; Ashley M Fuhrman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Resurgence as Choice: Implications for promoting durable behavior change.

Authors:  Brian D Greer; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2019-05-03

3.  A laboratory model for evaluating relapse of undesirable caregiver behavior.

Authors:  Daniel R Mitteer; Brian D Greer; Wayne W Fisher; Adam M Briggs; David P Wacker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resurgence and repeated within-session progressive-interval thinning of alternative reinforcement.

Authors:  Anthony N Nist; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Phase duration and resurgence.

Authors:  Sean W Smith; Brian D Greer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Changes in the elimination and resurgence of alcohol-maintained behavior in rats and the effects of naltrexone.

Authors:  Jemma E Cook; Cassie Chandler; Daniela Rüedi-Bettschen; Ian Taylor; Sean Patterson; Donna M Platt
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-11-21

7.  Evaluation of an Omnibus Mand in the Treatment of Multiply Controlled Destructive Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel R Mitteer; Wayne W Fisher; Adam M Briggs; Brian D Greer; Alexandra M Hardee
Journal:  Behav Dev Bull       Date:  2019-10

8.  Relapse after incentivized choice treatment in humans: A laboratory model for studying behavior change.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; José A Alcalá
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Shawn P Gilroy; Toshikazu Kuroda; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Evaluating Extinction, Renewal, and Resurgence of Operant Behavior in Humans with Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Toshikazu Kuroda; Jillian M Rung; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.