| Literature DB >> 28486995 |
Kamelia Osman1, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez2, Lorena Ruiz3, Jihan Badr4, Fatma ElHofy5, Khalid S Al-Maary6, Ihab M I Moussa6, Ashgan M Hessain7, Ahmed Orabi1, Alaa Saad4, Mohamed Elhadidy8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to characterize the diversity and magnitude of antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus species recovered from imported beef meat sold in the Egyptian market and the potential mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial resistance phenotypes including harboring of resistance genes (mecA, cfr, gyrA, gyrB, and grlA) and biofilm formation.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance genes; Coagulase-negative staphylococci; Coagulase-positive staphylococci; Imported beef meat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28486995 PMCID: PMC5424316 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0210-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Antimicrobial resistance patterns among Staphylococcus spp. strains isolated from imported beef meat
| Antibiotics | Number of antibiotics | Total number of isolates | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| VA | 1 | 1/23 | 4 |
| P, SXT | 2 | 6/23 | 26 |
| P, TE, VA, SXT | 4 | 1/23 | 4 |
| P, CN, E, DA, SXT | 5 | 2/23 | 9 |
| P, OX, CN, DA, SXT | |||
| P, OX, SAM, CN, DA, SXT | 6 | 3/23 | 13 |
| P, OX, MET, CN, DA, SXT | |||
| P, OX, E, DA, C, SXT, CIP | 7 | 5/23 | 22 |
| P, CN, DA, TE, VA, SXT, CIP | |||
| P, OX, CN, DA, TE, SXT, CIP | |||
| P, OX, MET, CN, DA, VA, SXT | |||
| P, OX, MET, CN, DA, VA, SXT, CIP | 8 | 2/23 | 9 |
| P, OX, MET, CN, E, DA, TE, VA, SXT | 9 | 3/23 | 13 |
| P, OX, MET, CN, E, DA, VA, SXT, CIP | |||
| P, OX, MET, SAM, E, DA, TE, VA, SXT |
C chloramphenicol, CIP ciprofloxacin, CN gentamycin, DA clindamycin, E erythromycin, MET methicillin, OX oxacillin, P penicilin, SAM ampicillin-sulbactam, SXT sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, TE tetracycline, VA vancomycin
Phenotypic (antibiotic resistance, haemolytic activity and biofilm formation ability) and genotypic (antibiotic resistance genes) profile of all Staphylococcus spp. strains isolated from imported meat
| Isolate | Species | Antibiotic resistance genes | Antibiotic resistance profile | Biofilm formation | Haemolysis | Virulence | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ampicillin-sulbactam | Chloramphenicol | Ciprofloxacin | Clindamycin | Erythromycin | Gentamycin | Methicillin | Oxacillin | Penicillin | Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim | Tetracycline | Vancomycin | Congo Red Agar | Tube method | α | β | δ | Vero cell | ||
| 1 |
| − | + | − | − | − | R | S | R | R | R | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 2 |
| − | + | − | − | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | − | + | + |
| 3 |
| − | − | − | + | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | − | + | + |
| 4 |
| + | − | + | − | − | S | S | S | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | S | R | + | + | − | + | − | + |
| 5 |
| − | + | − | − | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 6 |
| − | − | + | − | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 7 |
| + | + | + | + | − | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | + | + | + | − | − | + |
| 8 |
| + | − | − | − | − | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | S | R | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| 9 |
| − | + | + | − | − | S | S | S | R | S | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| 10 |
| − | + | − | − | − | S | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| 11 |
| − | + | + | + | − | S | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | R | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| 12 |
| + | − | + | + | − | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| 13 |
| − | + | + | − | − | S | R | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 14 |
| − | − | − | − | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | + | + | − | + | − | + |
| 15 |
| − | − | − | − | − | R | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| 16 |
| + | − | − | − | − | S | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | + | − | − | + | − | + |
| 17 |
| − | − | − | − | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | + | + | − | + | − | + |
| 18 |
| − | + | + | + | − | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | R | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 19 |
| − | + | + | − | − | S | S | R | R | S | R | S | R | R | R | R | S | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 20 |
| − | + | + | + | − | R | S | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | + | + | − | + | − | + |
| 21 |
| − | + | − | − | − | R | S | S | R | S | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | − | − | + |
| 22 |
| − | − | − | − | − | R | S | S | R | S | R | S | R | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | − | − | + |
| 23 |
| − | − | − | − | − | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | − | + | − | − | − | + |
Prevalence of the mecA gene in imported beef samples
|
| n = of MRS | Presence of | n = of MSS | Precence of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n= | % | n= | % | |||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 100 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 1 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 50 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 4 | 50 | 15 | 1 | 6.7 |
MRS methicillin resistant Staphylococcus, MSS methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus
Fig. 1a Correlation matrix of phenotypic (antibiotic resistance, haemolytic activity and biofilm formation ability) and genotypic (antibiotic resistance genes) features. b Correlation matrix showing only significant (p < 0.05) associations, as assessed by the Chi square test