Madeline Smith1, Megan McCool-Myers2, Melissa J Kottke3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA. 2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jane Fonda Center for Adolescent Reproductive Health, Emory University School of Medicine, 46 Armstrong Street SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. megan.myers@emory.edu. 3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jane Fonda Center for Adolescent Reproductive Health, Emory University School of Medicine, 46 Armstrong Street SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The postpartum period is a time of high unmet contraception need. Providing long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), particularly in the immediate postpartum period, is one strategy to meet contraceptive needs. This practice may also prevent unintended and short interpregnancy interval pregnancies. In recent years, state Medicaid programs have implemented reimbursement policies for LARC use in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess the uptake of inpatient postpartum LARCs at a large urban hospital with a sizable Medicaid population, before and after policy implementation. METHODS: Using billing records from January 2015 and December 2017, we extracted data on patient demographics and LARC uptake before Medicaid policy change (2015) and after policy change (2016 and 2017). Implant and intrauterine device insertions were classified as inpatient postpartum (0-7 days after birth), outpatient postpartum (1-8 weeks after) or interval (9+ weeks after). RESULTS: In the 3-year study period, 2091 LARC insertions occurred, of which 700 (33.5%) were inpatient postpartum, 429 (20.5%) outpatient postpartum, and 962 (46.0%) interval. After policy implementation, inpatient postpartum LARC insertions increased from 2.6 per 100 deliveries to 16.8 per 100 deliveries. Significant differences in uptake were seen in Black and Hispanic populations. The number of outpatient postpartum LARCs remained stable and tubal sterilizations decreased. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Implementation of reimbursement policies contributed to a sharp uptake of inpatient postpartum LARCs. Improved access to effective, reversible contraception could reduce the number of unplanned and short interpregnancy interval pregnancies, ultimately lowering rates of maternal morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVES: The postpartum period is a time of high unmet contraception need. Providing long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), particularly in the immediate postpartum period, is one strategy to meet contraceptive needs. This practice may also prevent unintended and short interpregnancy interval pregnancies. In recent years, state Medicaid programs have implemented reimbursement policies for LARC use in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess the uptake of inpatient postpartum LARCs at a large urban hospital with a sizable Medicaid population, before and after policy implementation. METHODS: Using billing records from January 2015 and December 2017, we extracted data on patient demographics and LARC uptake before Medicaid policy change (2015) and after policy change (2016 and 2017). Implant and intrauterine device insertions were classified as inpatient postpartum (0-7 days after birth), outpatient postpartum (1-8 weeks after) or interval (9+ weeks after). RESULTS: In the 3-year study period, 2091 LARC insertions occurred, of which 700 (33.5%) were inpatient postpartum, 429 (20.5%) outpatient postpartum, and 962 (46.0%) interval. After policy implementation, inpatient postpartum LARC insertions increased from 2.6 per 100 deliveries to 16.8 per 100 deliveries. Significant differences in uptake were seen in Black and Hispanic populations. The number of outpatient postpartum LARCs remained stable and tubal sterilizations decreased. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Implementation of reimbursement policies contributed to a sharp uptake of inpatient postpartum LARCs. Improved access to effective, reversible contraception could reduce the number of unplanned and short interpregnancy interval pregnancies, ultimately lowering rates of maternal morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Jeffrey T Jensen; Philip D Darney; Sarah E Little; Aaron B Caughey Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.661