Samannaaz S Khoja1, Charity G Moore2, Bret H Goodpaster3, Anthony Delitto1, Sara R Piva1. 1. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas Health Care System, Charlotte, North Carolina. 3. Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes, Orlando, Florida.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize skeletal muscle fat (SMF), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and assess the associations between these fat depots and physical function and physical activity. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis from an RA cohort, SMF, IMAT, and SAT were measured using computed tomography imaging of the midthigh cross-sectional region. Physical function was measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and a battery of performance-based tests that included quadriceps muscle strength, gait speed, repeated chair-stands, stair ascent, and single-leg stance. Physical activity was assessed using an activity monitor. Associations between SMF, IMAT, and SAT and physical function and activity were assessed by multiple linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), muscle area, and muscle strength. RESULTS: Sixty subjects with RA (82% female, mean ± SD age 59 ± 10 years, mean ± SD BMI 31.79 ± 7.16 kg/m2 ) were included. In the adjusted models, lower SMF was associated with greater gait speed, single-leg stance, quadriceps strength, and physical activity, and less disability (R2 Δ range 0.06-0.25; P < 0.05), whereas IMAT was not associated with physical function or physical activity and SAT was negatively associated with disability (HAQ) (R2 Δ = 0.13; P < 0.05) and weakly but positively associated with muscle strength (R2 Δ = 0.023; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Fat infiltration within the muscle seems to independently contribute to low physical function and physical activity, contrary to IMAT or SAT accumulation. Longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm the impact of SMF on disability and health promotion in persons with RA.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize skeletal muscle fat (SMF), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and assess the associations between these fat depots and physical function and physical activity. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis from an RA cohort, SMF, IMAT, and SAT were measured using computed tomography imaging of the midthigh cross-sectional region. Physical function was measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and a battery of performance-based tests that included quadriceps muscle strength, gait speed, repeated chair-stands, stair ascent, and single-leg stance. Physical activity was assessed using an activity monitor. Associations between SMF, IMAT, and SAT and physical function and activity were assessed by multiple linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), muscle area, and muscle strength. RESULTS: Sixty subjects with RA (82% female, mean ± SD age 59 ± 10 years, mean ± SD BMI 31.79 ± 7.16 kg/m2 ) were included. In the adjusted models, lower SMF was associated with greater gait speed, single-leg stance, quadriceps strength, and physical activity, and less disability (R2 Δ range 0.06-0.25; P < 0.05), whereas IMAT was not associated with physical function or physical activity and SAT was negatively associated with disability (HAQ) (R2 Δ = 0.13; P < 0.05) and weakly but positively associated with muscle strength (R2 Δ = 0.023; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Fat infiltration within the muscle seems to independently contribute to low physical function and physical activity, contrary to IMAT or SAT accumulation. Longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm the impact of SMF on disability and health promotion in persons with RA.
Authors: Celina Franco; Johannes D Veldhuis; Ali Iranmanesh; John Brandberg; Lars Lönn; Björn Andersson; Bengt-Ake Bengtsson; Johan Svensson; Gudmundur Johannsson Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: J David Curb; Clementina D Ceria-Ulep; Beatriz L Rodriguez; John Grove; Jack Guralnik; Brad J Willcox; Tim A Donlon; Kamal H Masaki; Randi Chen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Hiba AbouAssi; K Noelle Tune; Brian Gilmore; Lori A Bateman; Gary McDaniel; Michael Muehlbauer; Janet L Huebner; Helen M Hoenig; Virginia B Kraus; E William St Clair; William E Kraus; Kim M Huffman Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Rachel A Murphy; Ilse Reinders; Thomas C Register; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Anne B Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Bret H Goodpaster; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Tamara B Harris Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sara R Piva; Samannaaz S Khoja; Frederico G S Toledo; Mary Chester-Wasko; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Bret H Goodpaster; Clair N Smith; Anthony Delitto Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Joshua F Baker; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Jin Long; Babette Zemel; Said Ibrahim; Elena Taratuta; Mary B Leonard Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Beatriz Y Hanaoka; Matthew P Ithurburn; Cody A Rigsbee; S Louis Bridges; Douglas R Moellering; Barbara Gower; Marcas Bamman Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Joshua F Baker; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Jin Long; Elena Taratuta; Mary B Leonard; Babette Zemel Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Douglas E Long; Bailey D Peck; Steven C Tuggle; Alejandro G Villasante Tezanos; Samuel T Windham; Marcas M Bamman; Philip A Kern; Charlotte A Peterson; Rosicka G Walton Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Marc Villedon de Naide; Bruno Pereira; Daniel Courteix; Frederic Dutheil; Lucie Cassagnes; Yves Boirie; Martin Soubrier; Anne Tournadre Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Nicole K Biltz; Kelsey H Collins; Karen C Shen; Kendall Schwartz; Charles A Harris; Gretchen A Meyer Journal: J Physiol Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 5.182