Literature DB >> 28482055

Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data.

David W Bapst1, Holly A Schreiber1,2, Sandra J Carlson1.   

Abstract

Independent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses have often produced discordant results for certain groups which, for fossil-rich groups, raises the possibility that morphological data might mislead in those groups for which we depend upon morphology the most. Rhynchonellide brachiopods, with more than 500 extinct genera but only 19 extant genera represented today, provide an opportunity to explore the factors that produce contentious phylogenetic signal across datasets, as previous phylogenetic hypotheses generated from molecular sequence data bear little agreement with those constructed using morphological characters. Using a revised matrix of 66 morphological characters, and published ribosomal DNA sequences, we performed a series of combined phylogenetic analyses to identify conflicting phylogenetic signals. We completed a series of parsimony-based and Bayesian analyses, varying the data used, the taxa included, and the models used in the Bayesian analyses. We also performed simulation-based sensitivity analyses to assess whether the small size of the morphological data partition relative to the molecular data influenced the results of the combined analyses. In order to compare and contrast a large number of phylogenetic analyses and their resulting summary trees, we developed a measure for the incongruence between two topologies and simultaneously ignore any differences in phylogenetic resolution. Phylogenetic hypotheses generated using only morphological characters differed among each other, and with previous analyses, whereas molecular-only and combined Bayesian analyses produced extremely similar topologies. Characters historically associated with traditional classification in the Rhynchonellida have very low consistency indices on the topology preferred by the combined Bayesian analyses. Overall, this casts doubt on the use of morphological systematics to resolve relationships among the crown rhynchonellide brachiopods. However, expanding our dataset to a larger number of extinct taxa with intermediate morphologies is necessary to exclude the possibility that the morphology of extant taxa is not dominated by convergence along long branches.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachiopoda; combined analyses; morphology; paleontology; phylogenetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28482055      PMCID: PMC5790130          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syx049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  23 in total

1.  A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data.

Authors:  P O Lewis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology.

Authors:  Robert W Scotland; Richard G Olmstead; Jonathan R Bennett
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Combining phylogenomics and fossils in higher-level squamate reptile phylogeny: molecular data change the placement of fossil taxa.

Authors:  John J Wiens; Caitlin A Kuczynski; Ted Townsend; Tod W Reeder; Daniel G Mulcahy; Jack W Sites
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Modeling Character Change Heterogeneity in Phylogenetic Analyses of Morphology through the Use of Priors.

Authors:  April M Wright; Graeme T Lloyd; David M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Mosaics of convergences and noise in morphological phylogenies: what's in a viverrid-like carnivoran?

Authors:  Philippe Gaubert; W Chris Wozencraft; Pedro Cordeiro-Estrela; Géraldine Veron
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; Mark T Holder; John A Rhodes
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Limitations of metazoan 18S rRNA sequence data: implications for reconstructing a phylogeny of the animal kingdom and inferring the reality of the Cambrian explosion.

Authors:  E Abouheif; R Zardoya; A Meyer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology.

Authors:  D J Eernisse; A G Kluge
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Reilly; Mark N Puttick; Luke Parry; Alastair R Tanner; James E Tarver; James Fleming; Davide Pisani; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Assessment of available anatomical characters for linking living mammals to fossil taxa in phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Thomas Guillerme; Natalie Cooper
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  4 in total

1.  Paleozoic origins of cheilostome bryozoans and their parental care inferred by a new genome-skimmed phylogeny.

Authors:  Russell J S Orr; Emanuela Di Martino; Mali H Ramsfjell; Dennis P Gordon; Björn Berning; Ismael Chowdhury; Sean Craig; Robyn L Cumming; Blanca Figuerola; Wayne Florence; Jean-Georges Harmelin; Masato Hirose; Danwei Huang; Sudhanshi S Jain; Helen L Jenkins; Olga N Kotenko; Piotr Kuklinski; Hannah E Lee; Teresa Madurell; Linda McCann; Hannah L Mello; Matthias Obst; Andrew N Ostrovsky; Gustav Paulay; Joanne S Porter; Natalia N Shunatova; Abigail M Smith; Javier Souto-Derungs; Leandro M Vieira; Kjetil L Voje; Andrea Waeschenbach; Kamil Zágoršek; Rachel C M Warnock; Lee Hsiang Liow
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  New opabiniid diversifies the weirdest wonders of the euarthropod stem group.

Authors:  Stephen Pates; Joanna M Wolfe; Rudy Lerosey-Aubril; Allison C Daley; Javier Ortega-Hernández
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Estimating the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles (Cryptodira) from landmark data: an assessment of different methods.

Authors:  Eduardo Ascarrunz; Julien Claude; Walter G Joyce
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Phylogeny of Libellulidae (Odonata: Anisoptera): comparison of molecular and morphology-based phylogenies based on wing morphology and migration.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Huang; Hai-Rui Wang; Wan-Qin Yang; Ya-Chu Si; Yu-Tian Wang; Meng-Lian Sun; Xin Qi; Yi Bai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.