Literature DB >> 26715586

Modeling Character Change Heterogeneity in Phylogenetic Analyses of Morphology through the Use of Priors.

April M Wright1, Graeme T Lloyd2, David M Hillis3.   

Abstract

The Mk model was developed for estimating phylogenetic trees from discrete morphological data, whether for living or fossil taxa. Like any model, the Mk model makes a number of assumptions. One assumption is that transitions between character states are symmetric (i.e., the probability of changing from 0 to 1 is the same as 1 to 0). However, some characters in a data matrix may not satisfy this assumption. Here, we test methods for relaxing this assumption in a Bayesian context. Using empirical data sets, we perform model fitting to illustrate cases in which modeling asymmetric transition rates among characters is preferable to the standard Mk model. We use simulated data sets to demonstrate that choosing the best-fit model of transition-state symmetry can improve model fit and phylogenetic estimation.
© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; morphology; paleontology; phylogeny; priors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26715586     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syv122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  21 in total

1.  Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.

Authors:  Yimeng Li; Marcello Ruta; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  A Simulation-Based Evaluation of Tip-Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.

Authors:  Arong Luo; David A Duchêne; Chi Zhang; Chao-Dong Zhu; Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  An algorithm for Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis with Inapplicable Data.

Authors:  Martin D Brazeau; Thomas Guillerme; Martin R Smith
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 4.  A Systematist's Guide to Estimating Bayesian Phylogenies From Morphological Data.

Authors:  April M Wright
Journal:  Insect Syst Divers       Date:  2019-06-18

5.  Improvements in the fossil record may largely resolve current conflicts between morphological and molecular estimates of mammal phylogeny.

Authors:  Robin M D Beck; Charles Baillie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data.

Authors:  David W Bapst; Holly A Schreiber; Sandra J Carlson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Topology, divergence dates, and macroevolutionary inferences vary between different tip-dating approaches applied to fossil theropods (Dinosauria).

Authors:  D W Bapst; A M Wright; N J Matzke; G T Lloyd
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Bayesian and likelihood phylogenetic reconstructions of morphological traits are not discordant when taking uncertainty into consideration: a comment on Puttick et al.

Authors:  Joseph W Brown; Caroline Parins-Fukuchi; Gregory W Stull; Oscar M Vargas; Stephen A Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Extinction rates of non-avian dinosaur species are uncorrelated with the rate of evolution of phylogenetically informative characters.

Authors:  Nicholas M A Crouch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The systematics of the Cervidae: a total evidence approach.

Authors:  Nicola S Heckeberg
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.