| Literature DB >> 28481316 |
Mohamed A Farag1, Sara E Ali2, Rashad H Hodaya3, Hesham R El-Seedi4,5, Haider N Sultani6, Annegret Laub7, Tarek F Eissa8, Fouad O F Abou-Zaid9, Ludger A Wessjohann10.
Abstract
Plants of the Allium genus produce sulphur compounds that give them a characteristic (alliaceous) flavour and mediate for their medicinal use. In this study, the chemical composition and antimicrobial properties of Allium cepa red cv. and A. sativum in the context of three different drying processes were assessed using metabolomics. Bulbs were dried using either microwave, air drying, or freeze drying and further subjected to chemical analysis of their composition of volatile and non-volatile metabolites. Volatiles were collected using solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with 42 identified volatiles including 30 sulphur compounds, four nitriles, three aromatics, and three esters. Profiling of the polar non-volatile metabolites via ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution MS (UPLC/MS) annotated 51 metabolites including dipeptides, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and fatty acids. Major peaks in GC/MS or UPLC/MS contributing to the discrimination between A. sativum and A. cepa red cv. were assigned to sulphur compounds and flavonoids. Whereas sulphur conjugates amounted to the major forms in A. sativum, flavonoids predominated in the chemical composition of A. cepa red cv. With regard to drying impact on Allium metabolites, notable and clear separations among specimens were revealed using principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA scores plot of the UPLC/MS dataset showed closer metabolite composition of microwave dried specimens to freeze dried ones, and distant from air dried bulbs, observed in both A. cepa and A. sativum. Compared to GC/MS, the UPLC/MS derived PCA model was more consistent and better in assessing the impact of drying on Allium metabolism. A phthalate derivative was found exclusively in a commercial garlic preparation via GC/MS, of yet unknown origin. The freeze dried samples of both Allium species exhibited stronger antimicrobial activities compared to dried specimens with A. sativum being in general more active than A. cepa red cv.Entities:
Keywords: anti-microbial; drying; flavonoids; garlic; metabolomics; onion; organosulphur
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28481316 PMCID: PMC6154556 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22050761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Volatiles identified via solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GC/MS) analysis of A. sativum and A. cepa red cv. and with amounts expressed as relative percentile (%), n = 3. Retention index (RI) is calculated relative to an alkane series C6–C20 analysed under the same conditions.
| Peak No. | r.t. (min) | RI | Volatiles | Relative Abundance (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | Sun-Dried | Microwave-Dried | Tomex | Fresh | Sun-Dried | Microwave-Dried | ||||
| 5.867 | 847 | Diallyl sulphide | tr. | 0.05 | 0.53 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 7.442 | 924 | 1-propenyl methyl disulphide | - | - | - | - | 5.27 | 5.32 | 4.41 | |
| 7.986 | 958 | Dimethyl trisulphide | - | - | - | - | 6.09 | 6.46 | 4.35 | |
| 8.003 | 969 | Dimethyl trisulphide isomer | tr. | tr. | 0.03 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 9.792 | 1068 | 2-Acetylpyrrole | - | - | - | - | 0.45 | 12.21 | 1.94 | |
| 9.85 | 1074 | Diallyl disulphide | 45.99 | 99.11 | 46.98 | 0.08 | - | - | - | |
| 10.167 | 1092 | Tetramethylpyrazine | 0.10 | tr. | 3.35 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 10.243 | 1097 | 2-Propenylthioacetonitrile | 1.27 | tr. | 0.5 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 10.307 | 1101 | Isopropyl-α-mercaptopropionate | - | - | - | - | 9.5 | 1.52 | 3.51 | |
| 10.717 | 1131 | Allyl methyl trisulphide | 0.43 | tr. | 1.43 | 0.04 | - | - | - | |
| 10.892 | 1143 | Diethanol disulphide | - | - | - | - | 8.93 | 5.22 | 4.29 | |
| 10.99 | 1149 | Methyl pentyl disulphide | - | - | - | - | 0.48 | 18.67 | 7.32 | |
| 11.046 | 1153 | 0.43 | tr. | 0.02 | 0.007 | - | - | - | ||
| 11.107 | 1157 | Allyl methyl trisulphide | - | - | - | - | 13.98 | 18.84 | 19.43 | |
| 11.118 | 1159 | Unknown sulphur | tr. | 0.004 | 0.24 | 0.0002 | - | - | - | |
| 11.157 | 1162 | Geranyl nitrile | tr. | 0.003 | 0.07 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 11.357 | 1175 | Methyl 2-methylheptanoate | tr. | tr. | 0.02 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 11.5 | 1186 | 3-Ethenyl-1,2-dithi-4-ene | 0.02 | 0.008 | 0.28 | 0.0005 | - | - | - | |
| 11.517 | 1189 | Diallyl disulphide isomer | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.47 | 0.001 | - | - | - | |
| 11.751 | 1203 | Unknown sulphur | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.906 | 0.001 | - | - | - | |
| 11.86 | 1212 | 3-Vinyl-1,2-dithiacyclohex-5-ene | 31.8 | 0.19 | 4.306 | 0.007 | - | - | - | |
| 11.873 | 1212 | 3-Ethenyl-1,2-dithi-5-ene isomer | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.85 | 0.001 | - | - | - | |
| 11.875 | 1212 | Dimethyl tetrasulphide | - | - | - | - | 3.51 | 2.73 | 1.98 | |
| 12.158 | 1234 | Unknown | - | - | - | - | 0.43 | 2.11 | 1.64 | |
| 12.161 | 1234 | tr. | 0.002 | 0.03 | tr. | - | - | - | ||
| 12.182 | 1236 | 3-Isopropyl benzaldehyde | tr. | 0.002 | 0.106 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 12.317 | 1246 | 4,7-Dimethylundecane | - | - | - | - | 0.59 | 1.14 | 1.91 | |
| 12.917 | 1293 | Diallyl trisulphide | 19.87 | 0.32 | 28.86 | 0.06 | - | - | - | |
| 12.919 | 1292 | (Allylsulfanyl)acetonitrile | - | - | - | - | 3.24 | 0.34 | 4.52 | |
| 13.23 | 1316 | Dipropyl trisulphide | - | - | - | - | 3.75 | 3.51 | 5.108 | |
| 13.37 | 1328 | unknown sulphur | - | - | - | - | 17.06 | 9.18 | 21.01 | |
| 13.42 | 1332 | Diallyl trisulphide isomer | - | - | - | - | 3.85 | 2.69 | 11.45 | |
| 14.00 | 1381 | 4-(Methylsulfinyl)butanenitrile | 0.002 | 0.02 | 2.27 | 0.003 | - | - | - | |
| 14.033 | 1382 | Unknown sulphur | 0.002 | 0.012 | 1.17 | 0.002 | - | - | - | |
| 15.408 | 1495 | unknown hydrocarbon | - | - | - | - | 1.56 | 2.19 | 2.37 | |
| 15.98 | 1535 | Diallyl tetrasulphide | 0.03 | 0.11 | 7.32 | 0.014 | - | - | - | |
| 16.18 | 1549 | 2,4-Dimethyl-5,6-dithia-2,7-nonadienal | tr. | 0.002 | 0.03 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 16.183 | 1549 | Unknown | tr. | 0.009 | 0.06 | tr. | - | - | - | |
| 16.291 | 1577 | Ethyl dodecanoate | tr. | tr. | 0.027 | 0.003 | - | - | - | |
| 16.717 | 1597 | Diethyl phthalate | tr. | tr. | 0.03 | 99.75 | - | - | - | |
| 17.00 | 1605 | 2,4-Dimethyl-5,6-dithia-2,7-nonadienal | - | - | - | - | 21.24 | 7.8 | 4.68 | |
| 18.058 | 1661 | Unknown sulphur | tr. | 0.031 | 0.04 | tr. | - | - | - | |
Figure 1Solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography mass spectrometry) (SPME-GC/MS) based principal component analysis (PCA) of fresh and dried A. sativum and A. cepa red cv. specimens. (A) Score plot of PC1 and PC2 scores; (B) Loading plot for PC1 components contributing peaks and their assignments, with each metabolite denoted by its mass/r.t. (min) value: M6; diallyl disulphide, M21; 3-Vinyl-1,2-dithiacyclohex-5-ene, M28; diallyl trisulphide and M40; diethyl phthalate. Peak numbering follows that listed in (Table 1) for volatiles identification using SPME-GC/MS.
Figure 2GC/MS based PCA score plot derived from modelling drying effect on A. sativum (A); A. cepa red cv. (C) one at a time separately to assess the effect of drying on metabolite composition (n = 3). The loading plot from A. sativum (B) and A. cepa red cv; (D) shows the most variant masses detected using GC/MS and contributing to the samples segregation. Volatiles are denoted with m/z/retention time (sec) pair and identifications are discussed in text. M6—diallyl-disulphide, M21—3-Vinyl-1,2-dithiacyclohex-5-ene, M28—diallyl trisulphide, and M40—diethyl phthalate. Peak numbering follows those listed in (Table 1) for volatiles identification using SPME-GC/MS.
Metabolites identified via UPLC/PDA/orbitrap-MS in methanol extracts of A. sativum and A. cepa red cv. extracts using negative and positive ionization mode.
| Peak | Rt Sec | MS | UV nm | Formula | Error ppm | MS/MS | Metabolite | Class | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 176.0954 | 265 | C6H10NO3S | −0.3 | - | Unknown | Peptide | + | - | |
| 38 | 191.0196 | 267 | C6H7O7 | 0.1 | - | Citric acid/Isocitric acid | Organic acid | + | - | |
| 70 | 337.1711 | - | C18H27O3NS | 1.4 | 319, 257, 175 | Unknown | - | + | - | |
| 86 | 554.1658 | 295 | C28H28NO11 | −2.7 | 392 | Simmondsin-di- | Nitrile | - | + | |
| 100 | 451.1401 | - | C17H27O10N2S | 0.7 | 433, 361, 289 | - | ||||
| 109 | 289.0873 | - | C11H17N2O5S | −3.1 | 271, 215, 128 | Peptide | + | - | ||
| 129 | 259.1298 | 281 | C11H19N2O5 | 0.6 | 203 | Peptide | - | + | ||
| 135 | 321.0612 | - | C11H17N2O5S2 | 1.1 | 303, 249, 128 | γ-Glutamyl- | Peptide | + | ||
| 149 | 421.182 | 281 | C17H29N2O10 | 1.1 | 403, 331, 259 | Peptide | - | + | ||
| 153 | 289.0873 | - | C11H17N2O5S | −3.1 | 271, 215, 128 | Peptide | + | - | ||
| 171 | 293.1135 | 218 | C14H17N2O5 | 2.7 | 165 | Peptide | + | + | ||
| 171 | 455.1666 | 290 | C20H27N2O10 | 1.2 | 437, 365, 293 | Peptide | + | + | ||
| 184 | 353.0285 | 225, 279 | C15H21N4O2S2 | 3.9 | 165, 121 | Allithiamine | Thiamine deriv. | + | - | |
| 184 | 165.019 | - | C8H5O4 | −0.6 | - | Phthalic acid | Phenolic acid | + | - | |
| 207 | 321.0587 | - | C11H17N2O5S2 | 0.0 | 249, 171 | γ-Glutamyl- | Peptide | + | - | |
| 231 | 625.1405 | 266, 343 | C27H29O17 | 0.2 | 361, 241 | Quercetin- | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 235 | 361.1081 | 266, 344 | C22H17O5 | 0.1 | 241 | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 235 | 625.1405 | 266, 343 | C27H29O17 | 0.2 | 361, 241 | Quercetin- | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 256 | 161 | 360 | C9H6O3 | −0.1 | - | Umbelliferone (IS) | Coumarin | - | - | |
| 273 | 179.0346 | 279 | C9H7O4 | 2.1 | - | Caffeic acid | Phenolic acid | + | - | |
| 302 | 463.0883 | 266, 365 | C21H19O12 | −0.2 | 301 | Quercetin- | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 309 | 447.0933 | 267, 362 | C21H19O11 | −1.0 | 285 | Kaempferol- | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 311 | 447.0933 | 267, 362 | C21H19O11 | −1.0 | 301 | Quercetin- | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 318 | 477.1029 | 365 | C22H21O12 | 2.1 | 315 | Isorhamnetin- | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 324 | 228.1241 | - | C11H18NO4 | 0.3 | - | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 330 | 409.091 | 276 | C26H17O3S | −1.5 | - | Unknown | - | + | - | |
| 330 | 193.0509 | 276 | C10H9O4 | −1.3 | - | Ferulic acid | Phenolic acid | + | - | |
| 335 | 262.1089 | - | C14H16NO4 | −1.6 | - | Acylated amino acid | - | + | ||
| 346 | 238.109 | 296 | C12H16NO4 | 0.6 | 164 | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 351 | 262.1088 | - | C14H16NO4 | −1.1 | - | Acylated amino acid | - | + | ||
| 352 | 273.08752 | - | C14H13O4N2 | 0.6 | 229 | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 354 | 419.0927 | - | C27H15O5 | −0.4 | - | Unknown | - | + | - | |
| 365 | 301.0357 | 370 | C15H9O7 | −0.8 | 161, 179 | Quercetin | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 372 | 305.0709 | - | C12H17O7S | −2.9 | 287, 225 | Jasmonic acid-hydroxy- | Oxylipid | + | - | |
| 378 | 423.1193 | - | C22H19N2O7 | 1.1 | - | Unknown | - | + | - | |
| 382 | 207.0658 | - | C11H11O4 | 2.1 | 177 | Caffeic acid dimethyl ether | Phenolic acid | + | - | |
| 413 | 285.0403 | - | C15H9O6 | 0.6 | 161, 175 | Kaempferol | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 423 | 315.051 | - | C16H11O7 | 0.1 | 300, 161, 176 | Isorhamnetin | Flavonol | - | + | |
| 439 | 329.2337 | - | C18H33O5 | −0.4 | 311, 293, 257, 229, 211, 175 | 9,12,13-trihydroxy octadeca-7-enoic acid | Fatty acid | + | + | |
| 530 | 223.0962 | - | C12H15O4 | 0.3 | 249 | Diethylphthalate | Aromatic | + | - | |
| 610 | 388.3057 | - | C21H42NO5 | 3.3 | 249, 317 | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 615 | 265.1477 | - | C12H25O4S | 0.9 | 175 | Trimethylnonanol sulphate | Oxylipid | + | + | |
| 641 | 297.15283 | - | C12H25O8 | −1.5 | 183 | Unknown | - | + | - | |
| 652 | 297.10323 | - | C19H21O3 | 4.3 | 183 | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 662 | 311.1686 | - | C20H23O3 | −5.9 | - | Unknown | - | - | + | |
| 670 | 311.1137 | - | C13H27O8 | −2.0 | - | Unknown | - | + | + | |
| 680 | 295.2276 | - | C18H31O3 | 1.1 | 249 | Oxo-octadecenoic acid | Fatty acid | + | - | |
| 867 | 279.2324 | - | C18H31O2 | 2.9 | 181 | Linoleic acid | Fatty acid | + | + | |
| 912 | 255.2329 | - | C16H31O2 | 0.2 | - | Palmitic acid | Fatty acid | + | - | |
| 927 | 281.2485 | - | C18H33O2 | 1.5 | - | Oleic acid | Fatty acid | + | + | |
| 983 | 283.2638 | - | C18H35O2 | 1.5 | - | Stearic acid | Fatty acid | + | + |
Figure 3Examples of natural product classes reported and detected in genus Allium via UPLC/MS with selected compound(s) discussed in the manuscript. (A) Peptides and amino acids; (B) flavonols and (C) fatty acids/oxylipids.
Figure 4Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS) supervised data analysis of modelling A. sativum versus A. cepa red cv. specimens analysed via UPLC-MS for their secondary metabolites. PCA score (A) and loading plot (B) (n = 3); OPLS-DA score plot (C) and loading S-plot (D). Segregation in both score plots shows enrichment of sulphur compounds in A. sativum versus flavonoids in A. cepa red cv. Peak numbering follow that listed in (Table 2) for metabolite identification via UPLC-MS.
Figure 5UPLC/MS based PCA score plot derived from modelling A. sativum specimens (A) and A. cepa red cv. specimens (C) one at a time separately to assess the effect of drying on metabolites composition (n = 3); The loading plot from A. sativum model (B) and A. cepa red cv. specimens (D) shows the most variant masses detected using UPLC/MS and contributing to the samples segregation. Metabolites are denoted with m/z/retention time (sec) pair and identifications are discussed in the text.