Literature DB >> 28480987

GABA metabolism and its role in gamma-band oscillatory activity during auditory processing: An MRS and EEG study.

Christine Wyss1, Desmond H Y Tse2, Michael Kometer1, Jürgen Dammers2, Rita Achermann3, N Jon Shah2,4,5,6, Wolfram Kawohl1, Irene Neuner2,4,5.   

Abstract

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate are believed to have inhibitory and exhibitory neuromodulatory effects that regulate the brain's response to sensory perception. Furthermore, frequency-specific synchronization of neuronal excitability within the gamma band (30-80 Hz) is attributable to a homeostatic balance between excitation and inhibition. However, our understanding of the physiological mechanism underlying gamma rhythms is based on animal models. Investigations of the relationship between GABA concentrations, glutamate concentrations, and gamma band activity in humans were mostly restricted to the visual cortex and are conflicting. Here, we performed a multimodal imaging study combining magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) with electroencephalography (EEG) in the auditory cortex. In 14 healthy subjects, we investigated the impact of individual differences in GABA and glutamate concentration on gamma band response (GBR) following auditory stimulus presentation. We explored the effects of bulk GABA on the GBR across frequency (30-200 Hz) and time (-200 to 600 ms) and found no significant relationship. Furthermore, no correlations were found between gamma peak frequency or power measures and metabolite concentrations (GABA, glutamate, and GABA/glutamate ratio). These findings suggest that, according to MRS measurements, and given the auditory stimuli used in this study, GABA and glutamate concentrations are unlikely to play a significant role in the inhibitory and excitatory drive in the generation of gamma band activity in the auditory cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3975-3987, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; auditory system; gamma oscillations; gamma-aminobutyric acid; gamma-band response; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28480987      PMCID: PMC6867079          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  79 in total

1.  Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components.

Authors:  M Neukirch; U Hegerl; R Kötitz; H Dorn; J Gallinat; W M Herrmann; U Gallinat
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.328

2.  Architectonics of the human cerebral cortex and transmitter receptor fingerprints: reconciling functional neuroanatomy and neurochemistry.

Authors:  K Zilles; N Palomero-Gallagher; C Grefkes; F Scheperjans; C Boy; K Amunts; A Schleicher
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.600

3.  What are we measuring with GABA magnetic resonance spectroscopy?

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Velicia Bachtiar; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 4.  Mechanisms of gamma oscillations.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Control of cortical GABA circuitry development by Nrg1 and ErbB4 signalling.

Authors:  Pietro Fazzari; Ana V Paternain; Manuel Valiente; Ramón Pla; Rafael Luján; Kent Lloyd; Juan Lerma; Oscar Marín; Beatriz Rico
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and healthy controls.

Authors:  Young-Min Park; Seung-Hwan Lee; Sangrae Kim; Sung-Man Bae
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.067

7.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Cortical plasticity, excitatory-inhibitory balance, and sensory perception.

Authors:  Ioana Carcea; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Resting GABA and glutamate concentrations do not predict visual gamma frequency or amplitude.

Authors:  Helena Cousijn; Saskia Haegens; George Wallis; Jamie Near; Mark G Stokes; Paul J Harrison; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Relationship between physiological measures of excitability and levels of glutamate and GABA in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  C J Stagg; S Bestmann; A O Constantinescu; L Moreno Moreno; C Allman; R Mekle; M Woolrich; J Near; H Johansen-Berg; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Applicability of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Nervous System: Focus on Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in the Neonate.

Authors:  Yang Zheng; Xiaoming Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  GABA-ergic Dynamics in Human Frontotemporal Networks Confirmed by Pharmaco-Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Natalie E Adams; Laura E Hughes; Holly N Phillips; Alexander D Shaw; Alexander G Murley; David Nesbitt; Thomas E Cope; W Richard Bevan-Jones; Luca Passamonti; James B Rowe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Relating the cortical visual contrast gain response to spectroscopy-measured excitatory and inhibitory metabolites in people who experience migraine.

Authors:  Yu Man Chan; Rebecca Glarin; Bradford A Moffat; Stefan Bode; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Altered temporal sensitivity in obesity is linked to pro-inflammatory state.

Authors:  Federica Scarpina; Paolo Marzullo; Stefania Mai; Alessandro Mauro; Massimo Scacchi; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.