Literature DB >> 11803241

Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components.

M Neukirch1, U Hegerl, R Kötitz, H Dorn, J Gallinat, W M Herrmann, U Gallinat.   

Abstract

This study compared the intensity dependence of the auditory evoked N1 and N1m components in 10 healthy subjects. The evoked responses were recorded simultaneously at 33 channels for the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and with a 37-channel magnetometer for the auditory evoked fields (AEF). They were satisfactorily modeled by a tangential and a radial dipole per hemisphere for the N1 component and a tangential dipole in the left hemisphere for the N1m component. The tangential dipoles showed different dipole characteristics. The amplitude of the AEP rose significantly with increasing stimulus intensity whereas the amplitudes of the AEF tended to plateau between the highest intensities. The magnetic dipole shifted to the surface of the skull with higher stimulus intensity whereas the electric tangential dipole moved to the center of the skull. The latencies decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11803241     DOI: 10.1159/000048672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychobiology        ISSN: 0302-282X            Impact factor:   2.328


  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Larry E Roberts; Lee M Miller; Kelly L McDonald; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Spatially congruent visual motion modulates activity of the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mikhail Zvyagintsev; Andrey R Nikolaev; Heike Thönnessen; Olga Sachs; Jürgen Dammers; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  GABA metabolism and its role in gamma-band oscillatory activity during auditory processing: An MRS and EEG study.

Authors:  Christine Wyss; Desmond H Y Tse; Michael Kometer; Jürgen Dammers; Rita Achermann; N Jon Shah; Wolfram Kawohl; Irene Neuner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.

Authors:  Hannu Tiitinen; Anna Mari Mäkelä; Ville Mäkinen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Magnetoencephalographic study on forward suppression by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural maskers.

Authors:  Tadashi Nishimura; Yuka Uratani; Tadao Okayasu; Seiji Nakagawa; Hiroshi Hosoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.