| Literature DB >> 28475654 |
Yunfu Gu1, Joy D Van Nostrand2, Liyou Wu2, Zhili He2, Yujia Qin2, Fang-Jie Zhao3,4, Jizhong Zhou2,5,6.
Abstract
To understand how soil microbial communities andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28475654 PMCID: PMC5419559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Diversity indices based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences from the five geographically distributed soils contaminated with different levels of arsenic.
See Fig 1 caption for the soil codes.
| Soil ID | No. of sequences | Richness | Evenness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 28450±17842a | 2966±69a | 0.92±0.00a | 7.39±0.04a |
| B2 | 22440±7748a | 2888±102a | 0.92±0.00a | 7.36±0.05a |
| C1 | 31263±17284a | 2717±4a | 0.89±0.00b | 7.09±0.01b |
| C2 | 20162±10758a | 2345±92b | 0.88±0.00c | 6.81±0.05c |
| UK | 29692±16741a | 1757±127c | 0.86±0.01d | 6.44±0.09d |
Note: Means ± SD in columns followed the same letter(s) are not statistically significant at 5% significance level.
a Detected sequence number.
b Detected OTU number.
c Evenness index.
d Shannon-Wiener index: higher numbers represent higher levels of diversity.
Fig 1Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot (environmental variables as vectors) showing differences in bacterial community structure (a) and As functional gene structure (b) of the five As contaminated soils from different geographical locations.
Soil codes: B1, Faridpur, Bangladesh; B2, Sonargaon, Bangladesh; C1, Chenzhou, China; C2, Qiyang, China; UK, Rothamsted, UK.
Fig 2Composition of microbial communities in the five soils at the phylum level.
Circles from inside out correspond to the soils B1, B2, C1, C2 and UK, respectively. See Fig 1 caption for the soil codes.
Fig 3Relative abundance of the Proteobacteria community composition in the five soils.
A, The relative abundance of the Proteobacteria; B, Relative abundance of the Alphaproteobacteria. See Fig 1 caption for the soil codes.
Fig 4Heatmap of the 10 most abundant genera in each soil.
The 10 most abundant genera in each sample were selected (a total of 27 genera for all five soils), and their abundances were compared to those in other soils. The color intensity in each cell shows the percentage of a genus in a soil. See Fig 1 caption for the soil codes.
Fig 5Variation partitioning analyses of As functional genes (A) and microbial community (B) explained by the soil selected properties and geographic locations.
The diagram represents the biological variation partitioned into the relative effects of each factor or a combination of factors, in which arrow thickness was proportional to the respective percentages of explained variation. Letter ′a′represents the combined effect of soil properties and geographic location. Letter ′b′represents the effect that could not be explained by any of the variables tested. And letters ′c′ and ′d′ represent the effect of soil properties and geographic location, respectively.