| Literature DB >> 31922045 |
Anirban Chakraborty1, Chanchal K DasGupta1, Punyasloke Bhadury2.
Abstract
High arsenic concentration in groundwater is a severe environmental problem affecting human health, particularly in countries of South and South-East Asia. The Bengal Delta Plain (BDP) distributed within India and Bangladesh is a major arsenic-affected region where groundwater is the primary source of drinking water. Previous studies have indicated that members of the bacterial class Betaproteobacteria constitute a major fraction of the microbial community in many of the aquifers within this region. Bacteria belonging to this class are known to be involved in redox cycling of arsenic as well as other metals such iron and manganese, thereby impacting arsenic mobilization and immobilization. While microbial diversity in arsenic-contaminated environments is generally assessed using universal 16S rRNA gene primers, targeted evaluation of Betaproteobacteria diversity remains poorly constrained. In this study, bacterial diversity was investigated in the groundwater from two shallow aquifers (West Bengal, India) based on 16S rRNA gene clone libraries and sequencing using a custom-designed pair of primers specific to Betaproteobacteria. Specificity of the primers was confirmed in silico as well as by the absence of PCR amplification of other bacterial classes. Four major families (Burkholderiaceae, Comamonadaceae, Gallionellaceae and Rhodocyclaceae) were detected among which members of Burkholderiaceae represented 59% and 71% of the total community in each aquifer. The four OTUs (operational taxonomic units; 97% sequence identity) within Burkholderiaceae were close phylogenetic relatives of bacteria within the genus Burkholderia known to solubilize phosphate minerals. Additionally, the OTUs belonging to Gallionellaceae were closely related to the members of the genera Gallionella and Sideroxydans, known to oxidize iron under microaerophilic conditions. These results suggest that members of Betaproteobacteria can potentially influence iron and phosphorus cycling which can influence biogeochemistry in arsenic-contaminated aquifers of the BDP.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Aquifer; Arsenic; Bacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Environmental geochemistry; Environmental science; Groundwater; Hydrology; Microbiology; Microorganism; Primers
Year: 2020 PMID: 31922045 PMCID: PMC6948241 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Map of mainland India highlighting the districts where groundwater is As-affected along with a blowup of Nadia district, showing the locations of the sampling wells in the Karimpur II block.
The names, NCBI Accession Numbers and taxonomy of the 36 bacterial species (27 belonging to Betaproteobacteria) which were chosen for designing the pair of primers used in this study.
| Accession Number# | Domain | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organism (Betaproteobacteria) | |||||||
| HM625980 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | ||
| CP001392 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | ||
| NR_024884 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Rhodocyclales | Rhodocyclaceae | ||
| NC_007298 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Rhodocyclales | Rhodocyclaceae | ||
| AF170348 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Rhodocyclales | Rhodocyclaceae | ||
| NR_074731 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Nitrosomonadales | Gallionellaceae | ||
| DQ386859 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Nitrosomonadales | Gallionellaceae | ||
| NR_025916 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | ||
| DQ386263 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Ferritrophicales | Ferritrophicaceae | ||
| AY609199 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Neisseriales | Chromobacteriaceae | ||
| HE681736 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | ||
| NC_005085 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Neisseriales | Chromobacteriaceae | ||
| DQ997838 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Burkholderiaceae | ||
| NR_025840 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | ||
| NR_040895 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Neisseriales | Chromobacteriaceae | ||
| KC156906 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Alcaligenaceae | ||
| AB506456 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Sulfuricellales | Sulfuricellaceae | ||
| NR_025358 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Hydrogenophilales | Hydrogenophilaceae | ||
| EU194892 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Methylophilales | Methylophilaceae | ||
| AL954747 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Nitrosomonadales | Nitrosomonadaceae | ||
| CU207211 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Oxalobacteraceae | ||
| AY123800 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Nitrosomonadales | Nitrosomonadaceae | ||
| JQ695937 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Burkholderiaceae | ||
| Y17591 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Rhodocyclales | Rhodocyclaceae | ||
| NR_114858 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | ||
| GU585669 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Sutterellaceae | ||
| NR_115328 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Nitrosomonadales | Spirillaceae | ||
| Organism (Non-Betaproteobacteria) | |||||||
| GQ262802 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Rhodospirillales | Rhodospirillaceae | ||
| EF493243 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Zetaproteobacteria | Mariprofundales | Mariprofundaceae | ||
| L07834 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | Desulfuromonadales | Geobacteraceae | ||
| GQ365620 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Rhodospirillales | Rhodospirillaceae | ||
| NR_074798 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Alteromonadales | Shewanellaceae | ||
| AY954687 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Rhodobacterales | Rhodobacteraceae | ||
| AJ519989 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Xanthomonadales | Xanthomonadaceae | ||
| AE014075 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | ||
| KC156905 | Bacteria | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | Moraxellaceae | ||
Summary of three year's geochemical data comprised of groundwater pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), total dissolved solids (TDS), total arsenic (As), total iron (Fe), nitrate and phosphate in the two BDP wells.
| Well 28 | Well 204 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y2013* | Y2011‡ | Y2010‡ | Y2013* | Y2011‡ | Y2010‡ | |
| pH | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 6.8 |
| Temperature (°C) | 24.3 | 22.3 | 24.7 | 25.6 | 23.4 | 24.4 |
| DO (mg/l) | 2.8 | n.m. | n.m. | 3.1 | n.m. | n.m. |
| TDS (mg/l) | 351 | 358 | 336 | 382 | 379 | 373 |
| Total As (μg/l) | 81 | 55 | 35 | 125 | 117 | 37 |
| Total Fe (mg/l) | 1.3 | 1.65 | 1 | 2.4 | 3.45 | 0.39 |
| NO3- (mg/l) | 0.5 | n.m. | n.m. | 5.14 | n.m. | n.m. |
| PO43- (μg/l) | 50 | n.m. | n.m. | 260 | n.m. | n.m. |
*This study; ‡ previous two year's sampling data; n.m.: not measured.
Alpha diversity estimates of the Betaproteobacteria communities inhabiting the two BDP wells.
| Total | Well 28 | Well 204 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clone sequences | 89 | 44 | 45 |
| Number of OTUs | 16 | 10 | 9 |
| Chao1 richness estimate | 16.75 | 11 | 9 |
| ACE richness estimate | 17.66 | 12.33 | 9 |
| Shannon diversity index (Hʹ) | 2.34 | 1.87 | 2.07 |
| Evenness index | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.94 |
OTU clustering was performed based on 97% sequence identity.
Evennness was calculated by dividing Shannon index by Ln (OTUs).
Figure 216S rRNA gene phylogenetic tree of the 16 representative Betaproteobacteria OTUs along with their closest phylogenetic relatives. The tree is annotated with the OTU detection frequencies in the two wells shown by the overlain bubble plot. The size of the bubbles indicates percentage relative sequence abundance. Shaded background panels show four family-level clades.
Figure 3Rarefaction curves of observed Betaproteobacteria OTUs for the 16S rRNA gene clone libraries from the two BDP wells.
Figure 4Differences in Betaproteobacteria communities (at the OTU level) between Well 28 and Well 204.