Literature DB >> 28474220

The Quality of Patient Information Booklets for Cancer Patients-an Evaluation of Free Accessible Material in German Language.

Christian Keinki1, Ivonne Rudolph2, Dana Ruetters2, Ulrike Kuenzel3, Jessica Lobitz2, Maike Schaefer2, Hani Hanaya2, Jutta Huebner2.   

Abstract

According to the information-seeking behaviors of patients, booklets which can be downloaded from the Internet for free are an important source of information notably for patients with cancer. This study investigated whether information booklets for patients with cancer available at German websites are in accordance with the formal and content criteria of evidence-based information. We compared and compiled both content and formal criteria by matching different national and international standards for written patient information using a merged instrument. A catalog with a total of 16 items within 4 categories (quality of the publication, quality of information, quality of information representation, and transparency) was created. Patient information booklets for the most frequent tumor types were collected from the Internet. A total of 52 different patient booklets were downloaded and assessed. Overall, no booklet fulfilled all criteria. The quality of the publications was evaluated with an average value of 1.67 while the quality of the information had a mean value of 1.45, and the quality of information presentation had a similar rating (1.39). The transparency criteria were evaluated as lowest with an average of 1.07. In summary, German booklets for cancer patients have some shortcomings concerning formal and content criteria for evidence-based patient information. The applied requirement catalog is suitable for wide use and may help in quality assurance of health information. It may be used as part of an obligatory external evaluation, which could help improving the quality of health information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based health information; Health literacy; Oncology; Patient information booklets

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28474220     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1224-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  15 in total

1.  Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Jo Ellins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-07

2.  [Opinion of medical students and medical faculty of the University of Ulm weekend seminar "Appraisal of the value of health services", 13 -15 May, 2011 on the "Good practice health information" article].

Authors:  David Klemperer
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2011-07-22

Review 3.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Importance of health literacy in oncology.

Authors:  Kelvin Koay; Penelope Schofield; Michael Jefford
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.601

5.  What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information - analysis of information on German websites.

Authors:  Patrick Liebl; Eckart Seilacher; Marie-Jolin Koester; Jan Stellamanns; Joerg Zell; Jutta Hübner
Journal:  Oncol Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.825

6.  Understandability of Patient Information Booklets for Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Christian Keinki; Richard Zowalla; Martin Wiesner; Marie Jolin Koester; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Patient information leaflets for prostate cancer: which leaflets should healthcare professionals recommend?

Authors:  C E Rees; J E Ford; C E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-03

8.  Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design.

Authors:  Frida Smith; Eva Carlsson; Dimitrios Kokkinakis; Markus Forsberg; Karl Kodeda; Richard Sawatzky; Febe Friberg; Joakim Öhlén
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-11-05

9.  Evaluation of printed health education materials for use by low-education families.

Authors:  Lesa Ryan; M Cynthia Logsdon; Sarah McGill; Reetta Stikes; Barbara Senior; Bridget Helinger; Beth Small; Deborah Winders Davis
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.176

10.  Evidence-based health information from the users' perspective--a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Irene Hirschberg; Gabriele Seidel; Daniel Strech; Hilda Bastian; Marie-Luise Dierks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality, Readability, and Understandability of German Booklets Addressing Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Julia Brütting; Lydia Reinhardt; Maike Bergmann; Dirk Schadendorf; Christiane Weber; Wolfgang Tilgen; Carola Berking; Friedegund Meier
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Smart health via mHealth? Potentials of mobile health apps for improving prevention and adherence of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Stefanie Scholz; Laura Teetz
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-01-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.