Literature DB >> 27726109

Understandability of Patient Information Booklets for Patients with Cancer.

Christian Keinki1, Richard Zowalla2, Martin Wiesner2, Marie Jolin Koester3, Jutta Huebner3.   

Abstract

The improvement of health literacy in general and the information of individual patient is a major concern of the German national cancer plan and similar initiatives in other western countries. The aim of our study was to assess the readability and understandability of information booklets for cancer patients available at German Web sites. A support vector machine (SVM) was used to discriminate between laymen- and expert-centric patient information booklets about nine most common tumor types. All booklets had to be available for free at the Internet. A total of 52 different patient booklets were downloaded and assessed. Overall, the assessment of all booklets showed that an understandability level L of 4.6 and therefore increased medical background knowledge is required to understand a random text selected from the sample. The assessed information booklets on cancer show very limited suitability for laymen. We were able to demonstrate that a medical background is necessary to understand the examined booklets. The current study highlights the need to create information material adjusted to the needs of laymen. Assessing understandability before publication, especially for laymen with low health literacy, could ensure the suitability and thus quality of the information material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based health information; Health literacy; Oncology; Patient information booklets; Readability; Understandability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27726109     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1121-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  33 in total

Review 1.  Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Al Mulley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

2.  Tailored information for cancer patients on the Internet: effects of visual cues and language complexity on information recall and satisfaction.

Authors:  Julia C M van Weert; Guda van Noort; Nadine Bol; Liset van Dijk; Kiek Tates; Jesse Jansen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-05-08

3.  [Opinion of medical students and medical faculty of the University of Ulm weekend seminar "Appraisal of the value of health services", 13 -15 May, 2011 on the "Good practice health information" article].

Authors:  David Klemperer
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2011-07-22

Review 4.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Information Needs of Cancer Patients and Perception of Impact of the Disease, of Self-Efficacy, and Locus of Control.

Authors:  C Keinki; E Seilacher; M Ebel; D Ruetters; I Kessler; J Stellamanns; I Rudolph; J Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Patient decision aids for cancer treatment: are there any alternatives?

Authors:  Gillian Spiegle; Eisar Al-Sukhni; Selina Schmocker; Anna R Gagliardi; J Charles Victor; Nancy N Baxter; Erin D Kennedy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].

Authors:  G Seidel; I Münch; M Dreier; B Borutta; U Walter; M-L Dierks
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A treatment decision aid may increase patient trust in the diabetes specialist. The Statin Choice randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael R Nannenga; Victor M Montori; Audrey J Weymiller; Steven A Smith; Teresa J H Christianson; Sandra C Bryant; Amiram Gafni; Cathy Charles; Rebecca J Mullan; Lesley A Jones; Enrique R Bolona; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  6 in total

1.  Computer-Based Readability Testing of Information Booklets for German Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Christian Keinki; Richard Zowalla; Monika Pobiruchin; Jutta Huebner; Martin Wiesner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The Quality of Patient Information Booklets for Cancer Patients-an Evaluation of Free Accessible Material in German Language.

Authors:  Christian Keinki; Ivonne Rudolph; Dana Ruetters; Ulrike Kuenzel; Jessica Lobitz; Maike Schaefer; Hani Hanaya; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Jelizaveta Gordejeva; Richard Zowalla; Monika Pobiruchin; Martin Wiesner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.076

4.  Supporting shared decision-making and people's understanding of medicines: An exploration of the acceptability and comprehensibility of patient information.

Authors:  Katie Gibson Smith; Jill L Booth; Derek Stewart; Sharon Pfleger; Laura Mciver; Kathrine Maclure
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  RTAnswers Online Patient Education Materials Deviate From Recommended Reading Levels.

Authors:  Stephen A Rosenberg; Ryan A Denu; David Francis; Craig R Hullett; Michael Fisher; Jessica M Schuster; Michael F Bassetti; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  Appl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-19

6.  Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) - evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nico Schneider; Anna Bäcker; Katja Brenk-Franz; Christian Keinki; Jutta Hübner; Florian Brandt; Geraldine von der Winkel; Lutz Hager; Bernhard Strauss; Uwe Altmann
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.